Case Study: Students’ Achievement In Chemistry, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (CTEM) at Urban School
Since Malaysia engaged to become a developed country and compete globally, Chemistry, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (CTEM) integrated into Malaysia education since the year 2017. This study determined students’ achievement in CTEM at urban schools. The Methodology for this study was quasi-experimetal with a sample of 30 students. The instrument used for data collection was test validated by two experts and reliability index of 0.79 was obtained. . The findings showed that the urban students learning CTEM for chemistry topics were still in improvement stage. It was concluded that learning achievement and performance such as critical thinking, creatitivity, problem-solving and innovative skills get improved as the CTEM are continuously integrated into the curriculum of urban schools.
Malaysia Education (2019). Academic Grading System in Education in Malaysia. Retrieved on 01 December, 2019 from https://www.malaysiaeducation.info/education-system/academic-grading- system.html
Ali, M., Surif, J., Zaid, N. M., Talib, C. A., Abdullah, A. H., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2018, December). The Effectiveness of a Mentor-Mentee Program on Malaysian
School Students' Interest in STEM. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 855-860). IEEE.
Aidoo, B., Boateng, S. K., Kissi, P. S., & Ofori, I. (2016). Effect of Problem-Based Learning on Students' Achievement in Chemistry. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(33), 103-108.
Anonymous. (2012). State Department of Education Report. Baltimore, MD. Center for Public Education. (2012). The United States of education: The changing
demographics of the United States and their schools. Retrieved from http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/ l
Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6(2), 4.
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11.
Blustein, D. L., Barnett, M., Mark, S., Depot, M., Lovering, M., Lee, Y., & DeBay, D. (2013). Examining urban students’ constructions of a STEM/career development intervention over time. Journal of Career Development, 40(1), 40-67.
Curriculum Development Division. (2016). Buku Penerangan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menegah (KSSM). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education.
Curriculum Development Centre. (2005). Integrated curriculum for secondary schools curriculum specifications, Chemistry form 4.
Capraro, M. M., Capraro, R. M., & Lewis, C. W. (2013). Improving urban schools: Equity and access in K-12 STEM education for all students. Information Age Publishing.
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., Scheurich, J. J., Jones, M., Morgan, J., Huggins, K. S., & Han, S. (2016). Impact of sustained professional development in STEM on outcome measures in a diverse urban district. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(2), 181-196.
Connelly, L. M. (2008). Pilot studies. Medsurg Nursing, 17(6), 411.
Duffin, L. C., Starling, M. P., Day, M. M., & Cribbs, J. D. (2016). The Effects of a Consumer Chemistry Intervention on Urban At Risk High School Students’ Performance, Utility Value, and Intentions to Pursue STEM. School Science and Mathematics, 116(7), 356-365.
Duran, M., & Sendag, S. (2012). A preliminary investigation into critical thinking skills of urban high school students: Role of an IT/STEM program. Creative Education, 3(02), 241.
Duran, M., Höft, M., Lawson, D. B., Medjahed, B., & Orady, E. A. (2014). Urban high school students’ IT/STEM learning: Findings from a collaborative inquiry-and design-based afterschool program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 116-137.
Herschbach, D. R. (2011). The STEM initiative: Constraints and challenges. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 48(1), 96-122.
Huffman, D., Lawrenz, F., Thomas, K., & Clarkson, L. (2006). Collaborative evaluation communities in urban schools: A model of evaluation capacity building for STEM education. New Directions for Evaluation, 2006(109), 73-85.
Johnson, E. E. Peters-Burton, & T. J. Moore (Eds.), STEM road map: A framework for integrated STEM education (pp. 13-22). NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Khairani, A. Z. (2017). Assessing urban and rural teachers’ competencies in STEM integrated education in Malaysia. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 87, p. 04004). EDP Sciences.
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258.
Kubiszyn T. & Borich G.D., (2003). Educational Testing and Measurement. Wiley publications. ISBN0471149772, 9780471149774 Retrieved December 1st 2019 from https://books.google.com.my/books?id=hwYmAQAAIAAJ&q=kubiszyn
Labov, J. B., Reid, A. H., & Yamamoto, K. R. (2010). Integrated biology and undergraduate science education: a new biology education for the twenty-first century?. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(1), 10-16.
Merriam, S.B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th edition). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
McCracken, J. D., & Barcinas, J. D. T. (1991). Differences between rural and urban schools, student characteristics, and student aspirations in Ohio. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 7(2), 29-40.
Ministry of Education (2006). Biology Syllabus. Curriculum Development Centre, Ministry of Education. Ministry of Education, Malaysian Education Blueprint 2013-2025. (Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Putrajaya, 2013).
Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Kumano, Y. (2018). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skill of middle school through stem education project-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 54-65.
Nunnally, J.C. (1981). Psychometric theory. (2nd Ed). New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill publishing Co Ltd.
Opara, F., & Waswa, P. (2013). Enhancing students’ achievement in Chemistry through the Piagetian Model: The learning Cycle. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 4(4), 1270-1278.
Parker, C., Abel, Y., & Denisova, E. (2015). Urban elementary STEM initiative. School Science and Mathematics, 115(6), 292-301.
Ramli, N. F., & Talib, O. (2017). Can education institution implement STEM? From Malaysian teachers’ view. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(3), 721-732.
Salvucci, S., Walter, E., Conley, V., Fink, S., & Saba, M. (1997). Measurement Error Studies at the National Center for Education Statistics.
Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Method for Business: A Skill Building Approach. (4th Ed.) New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Siew, N. M. (2016). Integrating STEM in an engineering design process: The learning experience of rural secondary school students in an outreach challenge program. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences, 6, 128-141.
Sukor, N. S., Osman, K., & Abdullah, M. (2010). Students’ achievement of Malaysian 21st century skills in chemistry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1256-1260.
Tan, S. (2009). Misuses of KR-20 and Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients. Egitim ve Bilim, 34(152), 101.
The Star Online Newspaper, 2019. Retrieved 01 December 2019 from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2019/12/03/malaysia-improves-in-pisa-performance
Yunus, F. W., & Ali, Z. M. (2013). Attitude towards learning chemistry among secondary school students in Malaysia. Journal of Asian Behavioural Attitude, 3(11), 1-12.
Copyright (c) 2020 Sim Sing Jye, Corrienna Abdul Talib, Faruku Aliyu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.