Larangan Pengunggahan Konten Terkait FPI: Tinjauan Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia

Muhammad Fauzi, Mellayanah Mellayanah, Muhammad Akmal Rizki Rivaldi, Fairuz Arta Abhipraya

Abstract


The release of decisions with Home Ministers, Ministers of Law and Human Rights, Ministers of Communications and Informatics, Attorney General, The Police Chief of the Republic of Indonesia (Kapolri) and the Head of the National Body of Counter-Terrorism has been the basis for the dissolution and banning of all activities of the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI). Following up on this, it issued a declaration of Maklumat Kapolri No. 1/Mak/I/2021 on compliance with the ban on activities, the use of symbols and attributes and the application of fpi activities. Articel 2d of the maklumat forbidding access, uploading, and disseminating content related to FPI via the Internet is considered to have limited human rights. The study aims to see if there are any infractions and irregularities within the human rights code of the FPI content in the declaration. As for the research method used was normative juridical with a legal and conceptual approach. The source of data used is legislation on human rights, books, articles, and other sources related to the study. It was found in the study that article 2d of the maklumat went beyond the human rights code based on the principles of siracusa and the testing of three sets (three part test). Not only that, article 2d of the maklumat also threatens the freedom of press from journalists and the media in charge of spreading information to the public. The advice of the author regarding this matter should be the chief of police to update the declaration according to the purpose and purpose of the declaration issued, or at least revoke article 2d of the maklumat that feels has restricted the special human rights of free expression. This is so that the entire legal action in this country is consistent with the principles of the state of law and human rights.

Keywords: human rights, freedom of expression, freedom of pers


References


Asshiddiqqie, Jimly. Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang. Cetakan Ketiga. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2006.

Bachtiar. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Tangerang Selatan: Unpam Press, 2018.

ELSAM. Buku Saku Kebebasan Berekspresi Di Internet. Seri Internet Dan Ham. Vol. 53. Jakarta: Lembaga Studi Dan Advokasi Masyarakat (Elsam), 2013.

ELSAM, ICJR, IMDLN, PBHI, and YLBHI. Pidana Penghinaan Adalah Pembatasan Kemerdekaan Berpendapat Yang Inkonstitusional: Amicus Curiae (Komentar Tertulis). Jakarta, 2010.

Farida Indrati Soeprapto, Maria. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan (1): (Jenis Fungsi, Dan Materi Muatan). Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar [Edisi Revisi]. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2010.

Nasution, Adnan Buyung. Arus Pemikiran Konstitusionalisme: Hak Asasi Manusia Dan Demokrasi. Vol. 2. Jakarta: Kata Hasta Pustaka, 2007.

Smith; Rhona K. M.; At.Al. Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Hak Asasi Manusia Universitas Islam Indonesia (Pusham UII), 2008.

Anugrahadi, Adi. “Polri: Maklumat Kapolri Soal Fpi Bukan Untuk Pers Dan Media Massa.” Liputan6, 2021. Https://Www.Liputan6.Com/News/Read/4448993/Polri-Maklumat-Kapolri-Soal-Fpi-Bukan-Untuk-Pers-Dan-Media-Massa#:~:Text=Polri%3a Maklumat Kapolri Soal Fpi Bukan Untuk Pers Dan Media Massa,-Ady Anugrahadi&Text=Liputan6.Com%2c Jakarta - Mabes,Pers Tetap Mendapat Jaminan Konstitusional. diakses pada 27 Februari 2021.

Condro Bawono, Adi. “Perbedaan Keputusan Dengan Peraturan.” Hukumonline.Com, 2012. diakses pada 6 Februari 2021.

Farisa, Fitria Chusna. “6 Alasan Pemerintah Bubarkan Dan Larang Kegiatan Fpi...” Kompas.Com, 2020. Https://Nasional.Kompas.Com/Read/2020/12/30/14545951/6-Alasan-Pemerintah-Bubarkan-Dan-Larang-Kegiatan-Fpi?Page=All. diakses pada 30 Januari 2021.

Hamdi, Imam. “Organisasi Pers Hingga Ormas Sipil Kritik Maklumat Kapolri Soal Fpi.” Tempo, 2021. Https://Nasional.Tempo.Co/Read/1419594/Organisasi-Pers-Hingga-Ormas-Sipil-Kritik-Maklumat-Kapolri-Soal-Fpi/Full&View=Ok. diakses pada 27 Februari 2021.

Wicaksoo, Adhi. “Skb Fpi Organisasi Terlarang Ditandatangani 6 Pejabat Tinggi.” CNN Indonesia, 2020. https://cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20201230154923-12-587958/skb-fpi-organisasi-terlarang-ditandatangani-6-pejabat-tinggi. diakses pada 30 Janurai 2021.

Marwandianto, Marwandianto, And Hilmi Ardani Nasution. “Hak Atas Kebebasan Berpendapat Dan Berekspresi Dalam Koridor Penerapan Pasal 310 Dan 311 Kuhp.” Jurnal HAM, 2020. https://Doi.Org/10.30641/Ham.2020.11.1-25.

Matompo, Osgar S. “Pembatasan Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Prespektif Keadaan Darurat.” Jurnal Media Hukum 21, No. 1 (2014): 57–72.

Perangin-Angin, Ita Iya Pulina, Rahayu, And Nuswantoro Dwiwarno. “Kewajiban Dan Tanggungjawab Negara Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan Korban Revenge Porn Di Indonesia.” Diponegoro Law Journal 8, No. 1 (2019): 457–83.

Rahmanto, Tony Yuri. “Kebebasan Berekspresi Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia : Perlindungan, Permasalahan Dan Implementasinya Di Provinsi Jawa Barat.” Jurnal Hak Asasi Manusia 7, No. 1 (2016): 45–53.

Setiyani, And Joko Setiyono. “Penerapan Prinsip Pertanggungjawaban Negara Terhadap Kasus Pelanggaran Ham Etnis Rohingya Di Myanmar.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 2, No. 2 (2020): 261–74.

Siswoko, Kurniawan Hari. “Kebijakan Pemerintah Menangkal Penyebaran Berita Palsu Atau ‘Hoax.’” Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, Dan Seni 1, No. 1 (2017): 13. Https://Doi.Org/10.24912/Jmishumsen.V1i1.330.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v21i2.9947

Copyright (c) 2021 Kosmik Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2655-9242