Muthia Mutmainnah Darmuh, Erwin Akib


This study aimed to find out the students’ perception as the spoken feedback receiver towards the implementation of peer feedback in Debate subject. The data collection was conducted from June to August 2016. The data was collected from 15 students of English Education Department year 2013 from 6 classes of Debate Subject. This study used qualitative research design in collecting data. The instrument which was used to collect the data was questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed to 15 students of English Education Department from year 2013. The items of the questionnaire were open ended questions as qualitative questionnaire. Based on the findings, it finds that students gave the positive perception towards the implementation of peer feedback in Debate subject class either as spoken feedback receiver. Moreover, the students claimed that they have got many advantages during the implementation of peer feedback. This study also found out that this strategy was needed to be improved by the lecturers in terms of giving instruction, observing the class and evaluating the feedback from the students. 



Perception, Spoken Feedback, Peer Feedback, Debate subject


Anderson, T. (2010). The Effects of Tiered Corrective Feedback on Second Language academic writing.The University of British Columbia.

Curriculum Corporation, Assesment for Learning Education Service of Australia Retrieved on February,29th,2016, from :

Duncan, N. (2007). Feed-forward‟: improving students‟ use of tutor comments, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Vol.32.

Eu, S. L. (2013). A Qualitative Study of Second Language Writers' Response to and Use of Teacher and Peer Feedback - a proposal.

Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving Assessment Through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education. Routhledge, New York. Cornell University: Center for Teaching Excellence

Finkel, V. (2010). Mad Training Handbook .The Monash University of Australia.

Gay, L. R. 2006. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. New Jersey: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Grove, B. a. (2003). Research Design and Methodology. University of Johannesburg

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research.

Hyland, F. (2000). ESL Writers and Feedback: Giving More Autonomy to Students. Language Teaching Research.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on Second Language Students' Writing .Open University of Hong Kong: Language Teaching Research

Lahey, B. B. (2009). Psychology: An Introduction. McGRAW-HILL.

Marzano, (2012) Designing Effective Projects: Teacher and Peer Feedback. Intel@Teach program

Mc leod, saul. (2007). Simply Psychology. Retrieved on March, 1st,2016. From :

Miao, Badger, & Zhen, (2006). A Comparative Study of Peer and Teacher Written Feedback in A Chinese EFL Writing Class. Science Direct.

Morgan, D. L. Focus Groups the Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications, 1988.

Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The Nature of Feedback: How Different Types of Peer Feedback Affect Writing Performance. Pittsburgh: Learning Research and Development Center.

Ren, H., & Hu, G. (2012). Peer Review and Chinese EFL/ESL Student Writers.

Rollinson, P. (2005). Using Peer Feedback in the ESL Writing Class. ELT Oxford Journals.

Ross, J. F. (1995). Human, Psychology of Adjustment and Human Relationship. New York : Random House

Santrock, J. W. (2005). Psychology Essentials 2. McGRAW-HILL.

Spiller,D. (2012). Assessment: Feedback to Promote Student Learning. The University of Waikato.

Sultana, A. (2009). Peer Correction in ESL Classroom. BRAC University Journal, VI.

Sudjana. (1996). Metoda Statistika. Bandung: Penerbit Tarsito

The International Debate Education Association (IDEA), International Debate Education Association. Retrieved on February, 30th, 2016. From :

Full Text: ##PDF##

Copyright (c) 2017 Muthia Mutmainnah Darmuh, Erwin Akib

ISSN: 1978-1965