THE ENHANCEMENT OF ENGLISH TRAININGS FOR LECTURERS IN ENGLISH PRACTICUM CLASS

Sri Wahyuningsih

Abstract


This paper attempts at exploring some strategies used to improve the lecturers’ competence and facilities supporting the process of teaching English as well as the better outputs from English Practicum Class. The research belongs to a descriptive qualitative research. The interview and observation were done to gather data. The result showed that there are a number of programs designed and conducted by the chief and team of the language development unit (UPB) to enhance the competence of lecturers in English Practicum Class. These programs cover compiling a workbook of English Intensive Program “Have Fun with English”, conducting the International Conference and Call for Papers, providing Academic Writing Course for lecturers, training of TOEFL Test, training of English item test methodology, etc. In fact, some lecturers in English practicum class enthusiastically participate in such programs.

DOWNLOAD ABSTRACT

 


Keywords


English Trainings, Lecturers, English Practicum Class

References


Barnes & Murray. (1999). Developing the Pedagogical Information and Communications Technology Competence of Modern Foreign Languages Teacher Trainees. Situation: all change and plus ça change. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, Vol. 8, No. 2, Retrieved on 20 October 2017, from: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rtpe19

Chapelle, C.A., & Hegelheimer, V. (2004). The language teacher in the 21st century. In S. Fotos &C.M. Browne (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 299–316).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Confrey, Jere. (1995). ‘A Theory of Intellectual Development’. Journal For the Learning of Mathematics. Vol. 15,1 (Februari). 38-47.

Dovalil, V. (2015). Language management theory as a basis for the dynamic concept of EU language law. Current Issues in Language Planning, 2015.Vol. 16, No. 4, 360–377, Retrieved on March 29, 2015, from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2014.979678

Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005). New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(4), 311–326.

Jarvis, D. J. (2002). The Process Writing Method. The Internet TESL Journal, VIII (7). Retrieved on March 29, 2015, from http://iteslj.org.

Jones, S. J. (2006). Blogging and ESL writing: A case study of how students responded to the use of weblogs as a pedagogical tool for the writing process approach in a community college ESL writing class. Austin: The University of Texas.

Nekvapil, J. (2009). The integrative potential of Language Management Theory. In J. Nekvapil &T. Sherman (Eds.), Language management in contact situations: Perspectives from three continents (pp. 1–11). Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang.

Ose, J.E. (2014). Conference/Workshop Attendance by Librarians: Benefits, Challenges, and Prospects.Chinese Librarianship: an International Electronic Journal, 39. Retrieved on 20 October 2017, from: http://www.iclc.us/cliej/cl39IOO.pdf

Shulman, L. (1987) Knowledge and Teaching: foundations of the new reform,

Harvard Educational Review, 57, pp. 1–22.

Snow, P. C. (2016). Elizabeth Usher Memorial Lecture: Language is literacy is language-Positioning speech-language pathology in education policy, practice,paradigms and polemics. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2016; 18: 216–228. Retrieved on March 29, 2015, from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2015.1112837

Weger, H. J. , etc. (2014). The Relative Effectiveness of Active Listening in Initial Interactions, International Journal of Listening, 28:1, 13-31, DOI: 10.1080/10904018.2013.813234 Retrieved on 20 October 2017 from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2013.813234


Full Text: ##PDF##

Copyright (c) 2017 Sri Wahyuningsih

ISSN: 1978-1965