Kinerja Kontekstual dan Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi

Rion Nofrianda, Erita Yuliasesti Diah Sari, Herlina Siwi Widiana

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji komitmen afektif sebagai moderator pada pengaruh budaya organisasi dan kepuasan kerja terhadap kinerja kontekstual. Sebanyak 100 orang karyawan gerai makanan berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan skala kepuasan kerja, budaya organisasi, komitmen afektif dan kinerja kontekstual. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa komitmen afektif tidak mampu memoderasi  pengaruh budaya organisasi terhadap kinerja kontekstual, namun komitmen afektif secara signifikan mampu memoderisasi pengaruh kepuasan kerja terhadap kinerja kontekstual. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa untuk meningkatkan perilaku kinerja kontekstual karyawan, organisasi dapat mendorong karyawan untuk menginternalisasikan budaya organisasi, memiliki kepuasan kerja yang tinggi dan membuat karyawan memiliki komitmen afektif terhadap organisasinya.


Keywords


Budaya Organisasi; Kepuasan Kerja; Kinerja Kontekstual; Komitmen Afektif

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Zefeiti, S. M. B., Mohamad. M. A. (2017). The Influence of Organizational Commitment on Omani Public Employees’ Work Performance. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(2), 151-160.

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of occupational psychology, 63(1), 1-18.

Astuti, P. (2019). Pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan suportif, persepsi budaya organisasi dan kepuasan kerja intrinsik terhadap organizational citizenship behavior. (Tesis tidak dipublikasikan). Magister Psikologi Profesi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta

Azwar, S. (2015). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi (Edisi 2). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (2014). Organizational citizenship behavior and contextual performance: A special issue of human performance. Psychology Press.

Borman, W. C., Buck, D. E., Hanson, M. A., Motowidlo, S. J., Stark, S., & Drasgow, F. (2001). An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 965. Delobbe, N., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). A four-aspekonal model of organizational commitment among belgian employees. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 16(2), 125–138.

Edwards, B. D., Bell, S. T., Jr, W. A., & Decuir, A. D. (2008). Relationships between facets of job satisfaction and task and contextual performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(3), 441–465 doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00328.x.

Folorunso, O.O., Adewale, A.J., Abodunde, S.M. (2014), Exploring the effect of organizational commitment dimensions on employees performance: An empirical evidence from Academic Staff of Oyo State Owned Tertiary Institutions, Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(8), 275-286.

Govender, K. K. (2017). Leadership styles, organisation culture, and employee performance. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(4), 191-200.

Hox, J.J.& Bechger, T.M. (1999). An Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling. Family Science Review. 11, 354-373.

Hulin, C. L., & Judge, T. A. (2003). Job attitudes. dalam W. C. Borman, D. R. ligen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Kany, A. (2019). Pengaruh psychological capital dan perceived organizational support terhadap contextual performance dengan moderator spiritualitas kerja pada karyawan generasi millenial. (Tesis tidak dipublikasikan). Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta.

Kappagoda, U. W. M. R. (2012, February). Job Satisfaction and Its Impact on Task and Contextual Performance in the Banking Sector in Sri Lanka. In Proceedings, 1st International Conference on Management and Economics.

Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational behavior (12th ed). An Evidence-Based Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Motowidlo, S. J. (2000). Some basic issues related to contextual performance and organizational citizenship behavior in human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 115-126.

Niehoff, B, P., & Moorman, R.H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Jounal. 36(3), 327-556.

Oemar, Y. (2013). Pengaruh budaya organisasi, kemampuan kerja, dan komitmen organisasi terhadap organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 11 (1), 65 76.

Yu, V. S. O., & Wang, Y. (2018). THE INFLUENCE OF ORGANIZATION CULTURE ON MIDDLE-LEVEL MANAGERS'CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE WITH COMMITMENT AS A MEDIATING VARIABLE. Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business, 18(2), 58-71.

Pradhan, S., Jena, L. K., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2016). Transformational leadership and contextual performance: role of integrity among Indian it professionals. International journal of productivity and performance management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2016-0186.

Pradhan, S., Jena, L. K., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2018). Transformational leadership and contextual performance: Role of integrity among Indian IT professionals. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(2), 445-462.

Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization. the contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, (5), 825-836.

Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2015). Organizational behavior. England: Pearson Education Limited.

Spector, , P. E. (1985). Measurement of Human Service Staff Satisfaction: Development of the Job Satisfaction Survey. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13(6), 693-713.

Zhang, W. J. (2016). Relationship between organizational culture identity and job performance of enterprise employees. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science, (icaem).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30595/psychoidea.v18i1.6121

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 441 times
PDF - 268 times

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.