Mathematical Reasoning of Vocational High School Students on Mathematical Tasks in the Law of Demand Context

Ai Tusi Fatimah


This study aims to describe the mathematical reasoning abilities of vocational high school students in the business and management expertise in solving mathematical tasks in the law of demand context. This research uses the descriptive qualitative method. The participants consisted of six students categorized into three groups: high, medium, and low mathematical abilities. Participants from one of the vocational schools in Ciamis, Indonesia. Mathematical tasks to explore students' mathematical reasoning abilities in the law of demand context. The law of demand is a concept in business economics subjects. The task situation expanded as an alternative to solving more mathematical tasks—data from the results of student answers and interviews. Data analysis refers to the characteristics of mathematical reasoning, which consists of imitative and creative reasoning. The stages of data analysis are reduction, presentation, interpretation, inference, and verification. The results of data analysis show that all students tend to do imitative reasoning on each given task. Students tend to remember the law of demand formulas and perform mathematical procedures that they remember. Students often perform mathematical procedures that are not by the nature of mathematics so that the resulting solution is wrong. The law of demand questions designed to explore creative reasoning abilities has not been able to bring students to the flow of creative mathematical reasoning.


creative reasoning; imitative reasoning; the law of demand


Abrantes, P. (2001). Mathematical competence for all: Options, implications, and obstacles. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(2), 125–143.

Acedo, C., & Hughes, C. (2014). Principles for learning and competencies in the 21st-century curriculum. Prospects, 44(4), 503–525.

Aruka, Y. (2015). The Historic Design of the Demand Law and Its Reconstruction. In Evolutionary Foundations of Economic Science. Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science, vol 1 (1st ed., pp. 35–64). Springer.

Bakker, A. (2014). Characterizing and developing vocational mathematical knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 151–156.

Bakker, Arthur, Groenveld, D., Wijers, M., Akkerman, S. F., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2014). Proportional reasoning in the laboratory: An intervention study in vocational education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 211–221.

Boesen, J., Lithner, J., & Palm, T. (2010). The relation between types of assessment tasks and the mathematical reasoning students use. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 89–105.

Fatimah, A. T., & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Mathematical understanding and reasoning of vocational school students in agriculture-based mathematical tasks. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 701–712.

Fatimah, A. T., Pramuditya, S. A., & Wahyudin, W. (2019). Imitative and creative reasoning for mathematical problem solving (in context horticultural agribusiness). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4).

FitzSimons, G. E. (2014). Commentary on vocational mathematics education: Where mathematics education confronts the realities of people’s work. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 291–305.

FitzSimons, G. E., & Björklund Boistrup, L. (2017). In the workplace mathematics does not announce itself: towards overcoming the hiatus between mathematics education and work. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(3), 329–349.

Inglar, T. (2014). Proficiency forms and vocational pedagogical principles. JISTE, 18(2), 30–40.

Johnson, H. L., Coles, A., & Clarke, D. (2017). Mathematical tasks and the student: navigating “tensions of intentions” between designers, teachers, and students. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(6), 813–822.

Khoeriyah, D. A. N., & Ahmad, A. (2020). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Pada Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII B SMP Negeri 1 Padamara. AlphaMath : Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(1), 62.

Lithner, J. (2000a). Mathematical reasoning and familiar procedur. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(1), 83–95.

Lithner, J. (2000b). Mathematical reasoning in task solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 165–190.

Lithner, J. (2003). Students’ mathematical reasoning in university textbook exercises. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(1), 29–55.

Lithner, J. (2004). Mathematical reasoning in calculus textbook exercises. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(4), 405–427.

Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276.

Lithner, J. (2017). Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(6), 937–949.

Nicol, C. (2002). Where’s the math? prospective teachers visit the workplace 1. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 289–309.

Niss, M. (2003). Mathematical Competencies and the Learning of Mathematics : the Danish Kom Project. Proceedings of the 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematical Education, 115-124.

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.30595/alphamath.v7i2.10585

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2549-9084