UMPurwokerto Law Review
PLEA BARGAINING IN REALIZING EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS
The condition of the criminal justice system is allegedly full of corrupt practices (judicial corruption), facing the problem of piles of cases that are very severe (overloaded), slow and time-consuming (waste of time), proceed with expensive costs (very expensive), less able to accommodate the sense of justice in society (unresponsive), and too rigid, formal and too technical (nonflexible, formalistic, and technically). There are two problems that will be analyzed in this study, namely First, how plea bargaining can bring about effective and efficient criminal justice. Second, how is the bargaining plea in the Criminal Procedure Code Draft? Research shows that Plea Bargaining is a faster and more efficient case resolution if the defendant pleads guilty. Not only is the guilty plea of the defendant or the lawyer able to make an agreement with the public prosecutor regarding the generally lighter form and duration of the sentence. It is necessary to regulate the mechanism of the implementation of plea bargaining system in the criminal justice process, guarantees of the rights owned by the defendant at the time of plea bargaining mechanism, as well as time limits on each stage of the examination in order to realize an effective and efficient criminal justice.
Keywords: Plea Bargaining, Justice, Effective, and Efficient.
Abdussalam dan DPM Sitompul, 2007. Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta. Restu Agung.
Albert Alschuler, 1979. Plea Bargaining and Its History. Columbia. Journal Articles. Vol. 79 No. 1. University of Chichago Law School
Barda Nawawi arief dalam Tongat, 2010 Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Dalam Prespektif
Pembaharuan. Malang. UMM Press.
Evan Whitton, 2010, Our Corrupt Legal System; Why Everyone Is a Victim (Expept RichCriminals), Butterworth, Sydney,
Hiram E. Chodosh, Reforming Judicial Reform Inspired by U.S. Models, 52 DePaul L. Rev. 351
(2002) dan 19 Allegra M. McLeod, Exporting U.S. Criminal Justice, 29 Yale L. & Policy Rev. 83 (2010).
Igor and Ivana, 2010. Plea Bargaining: A Challenging Issue in the Law and Economics. Faculty Of Law, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek. Croatia
Inga Markovits, Exporting Law Reform-but Will It Travel, 37 Cornell Intl. L.J. 95 (2004),
K.Lewis, Taiwan's New Adversarial System and the Overlooked Challenge of Efficiency-Driven Reforms, 49 Va. J. 18 Intl. L. 651 (2009),
Langbein, 1979. Understanding the Short History of Plea Bargaining. Yale Law Achool. Rev.261. Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository
Lawrence M. Friedman, 1973, A History of American Law, New York, Touchstone
M.Najih, 2014. Politik Hukum Pidana : Konsepsi Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dalam Cita Negara Hukum. Malang. Setara Press.
Misha, 2005. Issues of Overcrowded Prisons and The Trade-Off “Plea Bargaining in the Criminal Justice”.
Mochtar Kusumaadmadja, 2002. Konsep-konsep Hukum Dalam Pembangunan. Alumni.Bandung.
Naskah Akademik RUU KUHAP versi 19 Desember 2012,
Pasal 199 Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Hukum Acara Pidana, Penjelasan Mengenai Jalur Khusus.
Pasal 9 Paragraf 3 Undang-Undang No. 12 tahun 2005 tentang Pengesahan International Covenant On Civil and Political Rights
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2015. Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta. Penerbit Kencana.
Romli Atmasasmita, 2010. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Jakarta. Kencana.
Satjipto Rahardjo, 2008. Negara Hukum yang Membahagiakan Rakyatnya. Yogyakarta. Genta
Sidhartha Mohapatra & Hailshree Saksena, 2009. Plea Bargain: A Uniqie Remedy. New York. http://indlaw.com
Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji, 2012, Penelitian Hukum Normative Suatu Tinjauan Singkat,Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
United Nation, 1991, The United Nations and Crime Prevention, United Nation, New York,William T. Pizzi & Mariangela Montagna, The Battle to Establish an Adversarial Trial System in Italy, 25 Mich. J. Intl. 16 L. 429 (2004
- There are currently no refbacks.