MEME: DAPATKAH MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN SISWA DALAM MENULIS TEKS ANEKDOT?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/jssh.v2i1.2315

Abstract

Writing anecdote text is a creative and productive process, meaning an ability that requires students to produce a product (writing) that aims to provide criticism/ satire accompanied by humor against an event that occurred. The fact that the ability to write anecdot text is still low, the difficulty in putting ideas and ideas into the main factor. The need for a model of learning with the use of media as a way to overcome these problems. Projects based learning assisted media meme are used based on literature review, which is a student-centered learning by applying the concept of the project (based on actual life that occurs) in order to solve the problem independently by using memes as a media that serves to clarify a message or content delivered. At the stage (1) the determination of fundamental questions about the events that occur (actual), (2) preparing the project plan (selection of data collection activities), (3) preparing a schedule (completion of activities), (4) monitoring project progress, (5) assessment of results, and (6) evaluation of experience (reflection of activities). This research aims to determine (a) the effectiveness of the model and (b) the effectiveness of the model in the experimental class (MIPA and IPS). The methodology used is a quasi experiment with 2 by 2 factorial research design. The results of research from data analysis, obtained (a) the difference in ability between the experimental class and control class students with N-gain experiments enter into medium category, while the N-gain controls enter into low category. (b) there is no difference ability in experimental class between MIPA and IPS class students. This shows that the model of Projects based learning assisted media meme effectively used in the class with the background of MIPA and IPS in SMA Negeri 15 Bandung.

 

Keyword: writing anecdote text, project based learning, and media meme. 

Author Biography

Fajar - Gumelar, Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

-

References

Anitah, S. (2010). Media pembelajaran. Surakarta:Yuma Pustaka.

Bachari, A.D. (2014). Penyusunan Bahan Ajar Teks Anekdot untuk Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Melalui Analisis Pragmatik. Disajikan pada seminar PMIOL 11, Malaysia.

Blackmore, S. (2010). Evolution and Memes: The Human Brain As a Selective Imitationdevice. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal. 32:1-2, 225-255, DOI: 10.1080/019697201300001867.

Damayanti, dkk. (2014). Pembelajaran Menulis Teks Anekdot Berpendekatan Saintifik dengan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek (Project Based Learning) pada Siswa Kelas X Tata Kecantikan Kulit 1 di SMK Negeri 2 Singaraja. e-Journal Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, vol: 2, hlm. 1-10.

Danandjaja, J. (1984). Faktor Indonesia: ilmu gossip, dongeng, dan lain-lain. Jakarta: Grafiti Pers.

Desmita (2012). Psikologi perkembangan peserta didik: panduan bagi orang tua dan guru dalam memahami psikologi anak usia SD, SMP, dan SMA. Bandung; PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.

Efstratia, D. (2014). Experiential Education Through Project Based Learning. ERPA 2014. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 152 ( 2014 ) 1256 – 1260

Ergül, N.R dan Kargınb, E.K. (2014). The Effect of Project Based Learning on Students’ Science Success. LINELT 2013. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 136 ( 2014 ) 537 – 541

Fatimah, N. (2013). Teks Anekdot Sebagai Sarana Pengembangan Kompetensi Bahasa dan Karakter Siswa. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, hlm. 215-238.

Fraenkel dkk. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in educational. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Grundlingh, L. (2017). Memes As Speech Acts. Social Semiotics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1303020

Hahner, L.A. (2013).The Riot Kiss: Framing Memes as Visual Argument, Argumentation and Advocacy, 49:3, 151-166

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. [daring] (http://physics.indiana.edu/-sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf, diakses pada tanggal 8 Desember 2017).

Jenkins, E.S. (2014). The Modes of Visual Rhetoric: Circulating Memes as Expressions. Quarterly Journal o f Speech.Vol. 100, No. 4, November 2014, pp. 442-466

Kauchak, D.P & Eggen, P.D. (2007). Learning and teaching research-based methods. Boston: Pearson Eduation.

Kemdikbud. (2014). Materi pelatihan guru implementasi kurikulum 2013 tahun ajaran 2014/2015: Mata pelajaran IPA SMP/MTs. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kosasih, E. (2014). Jenis-jenis teks. Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Kustandi, C & Sutjipto, B. (2013). Media pembelajaran; manual dan digital. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Mulyadi,Y. & Danaira, F. (2013). Bahasa Indonesia untuk SMA-MA/SMK kelas X. Bandung: YramaWidya.

Musa, F. dkk. (2011). Project-based Learning: Promoting Meaningful Language Learning for Workplace Skills. Kongres Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran UKM, 2010. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 18 (2011) 187–195.

Satori, D. (2014). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Semi, M.A. (2007). Dasar-dasar keterampilan menulis. Bandung: Angkasa.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan: pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan r&d. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tarigan, H.G. (2008). Menulis sebagai suatu keterampilan berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Wijana, I. (1995). Pemanfaatan Teks Humor dalam Pegajaran Aspek-Aspek Kebahasaan. Jurnal Bahasa Studi dan Pengajaran: Bahasa Humor, 1 (2), hlm. 23-30.

Wijayanto, E. (2013). Memetics: perspektif evolusionis membaca kebudayaan. Depok: Kepik.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2018-05-01

How to Cite

Gumelar, F. .-. (2018). MEME: DAPATKAH MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN SISWA DALAM MENULIS TEKS ANEKDOT?. JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial Dan Humaniora), 2(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.30595/jssh.v2i1.2315