Teachers’ Perception on the Implementation of English Curriculum in SMP Negeri 2 Jeruklegi Cilacap

Authors

  • Zahriyanda Benti Syam Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Saefurrohman Saefurrohman Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/mtf.v9i1.25220

Keywords:

Teachers’ perception, Curriculum 2013, Education, Learning, Development Curriculum

Abstract

This paper is aimed to figure out teachers’ perception in SMPN 2 Jeruklegi academic year 2020/2021 on curriculum 2013 implementation. The population of the study were all teachers at school (32 teachers). But the sample were only 30 teacher, since there were some teachers (2 teachers) who did not fill the questionnaire for health reasons. This paper employs descriptive analytic study that used questionnaire as the only instrument in conducting the study. The questionnaire was delivered to all teachers in SMPN 2 Jeruklegi through Google form since in pandemic era, it was almost possible to meet teachers in persons. From the data collection through questionnaire found out that 37% of teachers strongly agreed that curriculum 2013 should be implemented at school, while 63% other teachers stated agreed. It indicated that teachers were enthusiastic by the curriculum 2013 implementation. For curriculum 2013 understanding, almost all teachers (90%) understood about the thematic and scientific approach that used in curriculum 2013, while the other (10%) they stated understand well. From the total teachers (30 teachers), 30% totally agreed and 67% agreed that curriculum 2013 could build students’ character. Deals with book and references, 73% teachers agreed and the remain 27% strongly agreed that the contents of the book and reference break down or detail the competence domains of attitudes, knowledge and skills written in the 2013 curriculum document. In the meantime, there were some problems that faced by the teachers in implementing the curriculum 2013. The facilities and infrastructure available at school (3%), learning media that emphasizes scientific learning (17%) and the IT mastery (10%) were the obstacles for the teachers in implementing the 2013 curriculum.

References

Budi, Rahayu. 2015. Persepsi dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Oleh Guru Mata Pelajaran Geografi SMA Se-Kabupaten Purbalingga Tahun 2015. Retrieved from: http://eprints.ums.ac.id/32887/11/NASKAH%20PUBLIKASI.pdf

Huang, H.-P., Cheng, Y.-Y., & Yang, C.-F. (2017). Science Teachers’ Perception on Multicultural Education Literacy and Curriculum Practices. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01252a

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20, 2003 concerning the System National Education. 2013. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture

Setiawati, Pebriani 2018. Teachers’ Perception on the Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum in SMPN 9 Mataram in Academic Year 2017/2018. Retrieved from: http://eprints.unram.ac.id/6398/1/JOURNAL%20-%20PEBRIANI%20SETIAWATI%20%20%28E1D012059%29.pdf

Suharti, S., Rahman, U., & Ulfayana, H. (2019). Mathematic Teachers’ Perception Toward The Implementation Of Curriculum 2013. 22(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2019v22n1i7

White, W. F., & Simmons, M. (1974). First-Grade Readiness Predicted by Teachers’ Perception of Students’ Maturity and Students’ Perception of Self. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39(1), 395–399. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1974.39.1.395

Muzakky, M., & Albiansyah, A. (2021). EFL Teachers Perception toward the Use of Beyond International Textbook. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 15(2), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v15i2.28246

Klemše, N. L. (2023). Teachers’ perception of their readiness for online teaching. Journal of Educational Sciences & Psychology, 13 (75)(2), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.51865/jesp.2023.2.03

Downloads

Published

2022-04-30

How to Cite

Syam, Z. B., & Saefurrohman, S. (2022). Teachers’ Perception on the Implementation of English Curriculum in SMP Negeri 2 Jeruklegi Cilacap. Metafora: Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa Dan Sastra, 9(1), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.30595/mtf.v9i1.25220

Issue

Section

Article