The Using of Paper-mode Quizizz in EFL Classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30595/mtf.v9i2.25228Keywords:
EFL teachers, Perception, Lesson plans, Curriculum 2013, education, learningAbstract
This study aims to investigate EFL teachers’ perception on developing lesson plans on curriculum 2013. There are 16 teachers of English in Junior High School in Cilacap who participated in this study. To investigate teacher’s perceptions, questionnaires and interview were used. Guttman and Likert scale questionnaires were used to collect their insights on developing a lesson plan. An interview was administered to get in-depth information about teachers’ perceptions of developing lessons plans. The finding indicates that teachers of English have a negative perception on developing lesson plans. They feel unhappy, not encouraged, and unenthusiastic, even when they realize the developing lesson plan would facilitate and achieve their objective in teaching English. Unpredictably, the MGMP lesson plan product arises as resistance in developing a lesson plan. It is proposed to the teacher who implements curriculum 2013 to be creative and innovative to fulfill teaching objectivesThe study examines how English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers view the process of creating lesson plans under the Curriculum 2013 framework. Sixteen English teachers from junior high schools in Cilacap participated in the research. The researchers used questionnaires and interviews to gather information. They employed Guttman and Likert scale questionnaires to collect teachers' opinions on lesson plan development. Interviews were conducted to obtain more detailed insights. The results show that the teachers generally have a negative attitude towards developing lesson plans. They feel unhappy, unmotivated, and unenthusiastic about the process, even though they understand that lesson plans help them achieve their teaching goals. Unexpectedly, the study found that the MGMP (subject teachers' association) lesson plan product acts as a barrier to individual lesson plan development. This suggests that teachers may be relying on pre-made plans rather than creating their own. The researchers recommend that teachers implementing Curriculum 2013 should be creative and innovative in their approach to meet their teaching objectives, rather than relying solely on standardized plans.References
Borg, S. (2015). Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice. London: Bloomsbury.
Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Pearson Longman.
Kemendikbud. (2012). Bahan Uji Publik Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-Based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Regulation of Indonesia Ministry of Education and Culture No. 65 Year 2013 about Standard Process.
Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2011). Planning and Reflecting in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saputra, Dwi Bayu. (2019). The implementation of Curriculum 2013: English Teachers’ perception on Developing Lesson Plan and Teaching Material. Linguist, 5(2), 54–67.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Sugiono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: ALFABETA.
Woodward, T. (2009). Planning Lessons and Courses: Designing Sequences of Work for the Language Classroom. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Metafora: Jurnal Pembelajaran Bahasa Dan Sastra is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.