Optimalisasi Pengukuran Resiliensi Akademik: Uji Discriminant Content Validity Pada ARS-30 Versi Indonesia

Authors

  • Rifka Florensia Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya
  • Ide Bagus Siaputra Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/psychoidea.v21i1.16014

Keywords:

discriminant content validity, ARS-30 versi Indonesia, resiliensi akademik

Abstract

Resiliensi akademik adalah kemampuan mengatasi berbagai hambatan selama proses akademik yang ditandai dengan kestabilan kondisi sebelum dan sesudah hambatan sehingga memberikan peluang keberhasilan pendidikan. Salah satu alat ukur resiliensi akademik adalah ARS-30 yang terdiri dari 30 butir dan 3 faktor asal. ARS-30 telah divalidasi berdasarkan struktur internal dengan hasil yang kurang memuaskan dan belum dilakukan validasi berdasarkan konten. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji validitas ARS-30 versi Indonesia menggunakan metode discriminant content validtity (DCV). Sebanyak 11 panelis dengan kriteria memiliki publikasi tentang resiliensi atau resiliensi akademik berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Pemilihan panelis dilakukan secara convenience sampling. Pengambilan data dilakukan dengan mengirimkan google spreadsheet yang berisi alat ukur secara daring kepada setiap panelis. Hasil uji reliabilitas intra-class correlation menunjukkan faktor perseverance dan reflecting and adaptive help seeking memiliki reliabilitas baik dan faktor negative affect and emotional response memiliki reliabilitas moderat. Hasil DCV menunjukkan 12 butir bersifat tidak murni dan tidak memiliki faktor asal yang disediakan dan 18 lainnya bersifat murni.

Author Biography

Ide Bagus Siaputra, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya

He teaches psychology at Universitas Surabaya. He specialises in academic integrity and psychological measurement. International Journal for Educational Integrity's editor, reviewer, and writer (IJEI). The Springer Handbook of Academic Integrity chapter "Academic Integrity Campaign in Indonesia" is one of his finest achievements. Bagus came up with AK.SA.RA (Acknowledge, paraphrase, and integrate) to stop individuals from abusing other people's work. Bagus makes, changes, and validates different psychological tests that measure personality, career interests, intelligence, and how people deal with stress. He has been an expert on the content validity of the Character Survey for national assessments (AN) in Indonesia since 2020.

References

Agastiti, T., F.Avvisati, Borgonovi, F., & Longobardi., S. (2018). Academic Resilience: What Schools and Countries Do To Help Disadvantaged Students Succeed in PISA.OECD Working Papers No. 167. (No. 167). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/e22490ac-en.

American Educational Research Association, Americal Psychological Association, Education, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standard for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association.

Burrell, A. M. G., Allan, J. L., Williams, D. M., & Johnston, M. (2018). What do self-efficacy items measure? Examining the discriminant content validity of self-efficacy items. British Journal of Health Psychology, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12306

Cassidy, S. (2016). The Academic Resilience Scale (ARS-30): A New Multidimensional Construct Measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1787), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01787

Dixon, D., & Johnston, M. (2019). Editorial Content validity of measures of theoretical constructs in health psychology: Discriminant content validity is needed. British Journal of Health Psychology, 24, 477–484.

Hujig, J. M., Gebhardt, W. A., Crone, M. R., Dusseldorp, E., & Presseau, J. (2014). Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research. Implementation Science, 9(11), 1–16.

Johnston, M., Dixon, D., Hart, J., Glidewell, L., Schröder, C., & Pollard, B. (2014). Discriminant content validity: A quantitative methodology for assessing content of theory-based measures, with illustrative applications. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19(2), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12095

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

Kumalasari, D., Luthfiyani, N. A., & Grasiawaty, N. (2020). Analisis Faktor Adaptasi Instrumen Resiliensi Akademik Versi Indonesia: Pendekatan Eksploratori dan Konfirmatori. JPPP - Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengukuran Psikologi, 9(2), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.21009/jppp.092.06

Kumalasari, D., Luthfiyanni, N. A., & Grasiaswaty, N. (2020). Analisis Faktor Adaptasi Instrumen Resiliensi Akademik Versi Indonesia: Pendekatan Eksploratori dan Konfirmatori. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengukuran Psikologi, 9(2), 84–85.

Lynn, M. L. (1986). Determination and Quantification of Content Validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. . (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: a construct validity approach. Psychology in the School, 43(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20149

Ricketts, S. N., Engelhard, G., J., & Chang, M.-L. (2017). Academic Resilience in Mathematics Scale. Academic Resilience in Mathematics Scale. https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Ft61033-000

Schmitt, M. A., Schröder, C. D., Stenneberg, M. S., van Meeteren, N. L. U., Helders, P. J. M., Pollard, B., & Dixon, D. (2013). Content validity of the Dutch version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. Manual Therapy, 18(5), 386–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2013.01.004

Suarez-Orozco, C., Katsiaficas, D., Birchall, O., Alcantar, C. M., Hernandez, E., Garcia, Y., Michikyan, M., Cerda, J., & Teranishi, R. T. (2015). Undocumented undergraduates on college campuses: Understanding their challenges and assets and what it takes to make an undocufriendly campus. Harvard Educational Review, 85(3), 427–464.

Ye, W., Strietholt, R., & Blömeke, S. (2021). Academic resilience : underlying norms and validity of definitions Content courtesy of Springer Nature , terms of use apply . Rights reserved . Content courtesy of Springer Nature , terms of use apply . Rights reserved . Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33, 169–202.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-30

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 1 (2023): Psycho Idea

Section

PSYCHOIDEA

License

Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:

  • The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s) without restrictions
  • The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
  • The author grants the journal the first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgment of their initial publication in this journal
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (For example in the Institutional Repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger citations of published work
  • Articles and all related material published are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

License

Psycho Idea is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

You are free to :

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially