Peran Foto untuk Mendapatkan Kesan Pertama Positif Saat Online Dating Di Aplikasi Tinder

Authors

  • Andrea Prita Purnama Ratri BINUS University
  • Wella Jayanti Jayanti Universitas Bina Nusantara
  • Dzikria Afifah Primala Wijaya Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/psychoidea.v22i2.23630

Keywords:

foto, kesan pertama, online dating, Tinder

Abstract

Online dating telah menjadi cara baru dalam mencari pasangan. Berbagai layanan online dating diciptakan dengan tujuan mempertemukan para pengguna dengan pasangan yang potensial untuk menjalin hubungan romantis. Aplikasi online dating yang paling banyak dimiliki dan digunakan oleh pengguna internet adalah Tinder. Tinder merupakan aplikasi online dating yang menekankan pada tampilan foto profil sebagai faktor utama dalam keputusan untuk menyukai sebuah profil pengguna, maka, kesan pertama akan dimunculkan dari foto profil tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkapkan jenis foto yang dapat membentuk kesan pertama paling baik dan jenis foto yang dianggap paling menarik.  Penelitian sebelumnya telah membahas perilaku wanita dalam penggunaan aplikasi kencan, yang lebih selektif dan memiliki preferensi non-fisik sementara pria lebih memilih karena adanya daya tarik visual. Daya tarik visual yang menarik bagi pria belum pernah diteliti sebelumnya, sehingga penelitian ini menarik untuk dilakukan. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis Independent Sample Chi-Square Test, dengan 600 pengguna pria dilibatkan untuk analisis pembentukan kesan pertama berdasarkan sejumlah foto profil wanita yang ditampilkan. Rata-rata usia partisipan adalah 23,4 tahun. Foto yang paling banyak mendapat respon atau kesan pertama yang positif adalah foto full body, yang kedua foto mirror selfie, close-up, dan yang terakhir tanpa foto.

References

Alterovitz, S. S. R., & Mendelsohn, G. A. (2009). Partner preferences across the life span: Online dating by older adults. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 513.

APA. (2017). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code

APJII. (2022). Infografis Statistik Pengguna & Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia (Infographics of User Statistics & Behavior of Indonesian Internet Users). Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia.

APJII. (2023). Infografis Statistik Pengguna & Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia (Infographics of User Statistics & Behavior of Indonesian Internet Users). Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia.

Aretz, Demuth, Schmidt, & Vierlein. (2010). Partner search in the digital age. Psychological characteristics of Online-Dating-Service-Users and its contribution to the explanation of different patterns of utilization. Journal of Business and Media Psychology, 1, 8-16.

Bacev-Giles, C., & Haji, R. (2017). Online first impressions: Person perception in social media profiles. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.056

Bak, P. (2010). Sex differences in the attractiveness halo effect in the online dating environment. Journal of Business and Media Psychology, 1, 1-7.

Barrada, J. R., & Castro, N. (2020, October 31). Tinder Users: Sociodemographic, Psychological, and Psychosexual Characteristics. PubMed Central (PMC). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218047

Chin K., Edelstein R.S., Vernon P.A. Attached to dating apps: Attachment orientations and preferences for dating apps. Mob. Media Commun. 2019;7:41–59. doi: 10.1177/2050157918770696.

Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online Dating. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66. doi:10.1177/1529100612436522

Fiore, A. T., Taylor, L. S., Mendelsohn, G. A., & Hearst, M. (2008). Assessing Attractiveness in Online Dating Profiles. _Human Factors in Computing System_ doi: 10.1145/1357054.1357181

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends Cogn. Sci, 11(2), 77-83.

Gable, S. L., & Reis, H. T. (2001). Appetitive and aversive social interaction. In J. H. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 169-194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hadji-Vasilev, A. (2023, March 15). 25 Online Dating Statistics, Facts & Trends for 2023. Cloudwards. https://www.cloudwards.net/online-dating-statistics/

Hall, J., Park, N., Song, H., & Cody, M. J. (2010). Strategic misrepresentation in online dating: The effects of gender, self-monitoring, and personality traits. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 117– 135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02654 07509349633.

Jakpat. (2016). It’s a Match! - Survey Report on Indonesian Online Dating Apps Users. Websites. Diakses pada tanggal 15 April 2020, dari, https://blog.jakpat.net/its-a-match-survey-report-on-indonesian-online-dating-apps-users/

Kee, A. A. W., & Yazdanifard, R. (2015). The Review of the Ugly Truth and Negative Aspects of Online Dating. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: E Marketing, 15 (4), 31-36.

Laju, A. (2014). The Truth about Online Dating, Vanguard Online Newspaper. Diakses pada tanggal 4 Mei 2020, dari: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2014/01/truth-online-dating/

Li, J., & Bowen, J. P. (2022). Female self-presentation through online dating applications. In Proceedings of EVA London 2022, UK. London South Bank University.

Lo, S. K., Hsieh, A. Y., & Chiu, Y. P. (2013). Contradictory deceptive behavior in online dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1755–1762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.010

Marcum, C. D., Higgins, G. E., & Ricketts, M. L. (2014). Juveniles and cyber stalking in the United States: An analysis of theoretical predictors of patterns of online perpetration. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 8(1), 47-56

Mark, B. (2011). How Has Internet Dating Changed Society?. Diakses pada tanggal 1 Mei 2020. dari, www.onlinepersonalswatch.com/files/idea-white-paper

Mulawarman, & Nurfitri, A.D. (2017). Perilaku Pengguna Media Sosial beserta Implikasinya Ditinjau dari Pespektif Psikologi Sosial Terapan. Buletin Psikologi, 25(1), 36-44. DOI: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.22759

Orosz, G., Benyo, M., Berkes, B., Nikoletti, E., Gal, E., Toth-Kiraly, I., Bothe, B., (2018). The personality, motivational, and need-based background of problematic Tinder use. J. Behav. Addict. 7 (2), 301316.

Putri R., E. (2016). Foto Diri, Representasi Identitas dan Masyarakat Tontonan di Media Sosial Instagram. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi¸3 (1), 80-97.

Rakuten Insight. (2022). Survey on Mobile Dating Apps. https://insight.rakuten.com/

Rege, A. (2009). What’s Love Got to Do with It? Exploring Online Dating Scams and Identity Fraud. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3 (2), 494-512

Ritchie, K. L., Palermo, R., & Rhodes, G. (2017). Forming impressions of facial attractiveness is mandatory. Sci. Rep, 7(1), 469.

Rizaty, M.A. (2022, July 22). Pelanggan Tinder di Dunia Tembus 10 Juta per Kuartal I/2022. Dataindonesia.id. https://dataindonesia.id/internet/detail/pengguna-tinder-di-dunia-tembus-10-juta-orang-per-kuartal-i2022.

Rosa, A. O.-L., Arango-Tobón, O. E., & Ingram, G. P. D. (2019). Swiping right: Face Perception in the age of Tinder. Heliyon, 5(12), e02949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02949

Sagita, M., & Irwansyah, I. (2021). Finding Love During the Pandemic: Impression Management on Dating Apps. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3840736.

Seidman, G., & Miller, O. S. (2013). Effects of gender and physical attractiveness on visual attentions to Facebook profiles. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(1), 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0305

Sutherland, C. A. M., Oldmeadow, J. A., Santos, I. M., Towler, J., Michael Burt, D., & Young, A. W. (2013). Social inferences from faces: ambient images generate a three-dimensional model. Cognition, 127(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.12.001.

Tinder. (2019). Press. https://tinder.com/

Todorov, A., Pakrashi, M., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Soc. Cogn, 27(6), 813-833.

Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Looks and Lies: The Role Physical Attractiveness in Online Dating Self-Representation and Deception. Communication Research, 37 (3), 335-351. DOI: 10.1177/0093650209356437

Tyson, G., Perta, V. C., Haddadi, H., & Seto, M. C. (2016). A First Look at User Activity on Tinder. 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 461–466. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2016.7752275

Van der Zanden, T., Schouten, A. P., Mos, M. B. J., & Krahmer, E. J. (2020). Impression formation on online dating sites: Effects of language errors in profile texts on perceptions of profile owners’ attractiveness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(3), 758–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519878787

Vandeweerd, C., Myers, J., Coulter, M., Yalcin, A., & Corvin, J. (2016). Positives and negatives of online dating according to women 50+. Journal of Women & Aging, 28(3), 259–270. doi:10.1080/08952841.2015.1137435

Walther, J. B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L. M., & Shulman, H. C. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, 36(2), 229-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208330251

YouGov. (2017). A third of Indonesians have used internet dating. Websites. Diakses pada tanggal 20 April 2020. dari, https://id.yougov.com/en-id/news/2017/11/23/internet-dating



Published

2024-11-14

Issue

Section

PSYCHOIDEA