PENGARUH MORALITAS NATRIUM HIDROKSIDA TERHADAP KUAT TEKAN DAN POROSITAS MORTAR RINGAN GEOPOLIMER

Authors

  • Mufti Amir Sultan Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Khairun
  • Devina Puspa Hastira Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Khairun
  • Kusnadi Kusnadi Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Khairun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/techno.v26i1.22069

Keywords:

Activator, mortar, geopolymer, pumice sand, tidore

Abstract

Lightweight mortar is an alternative for developing  lightweight material innovations as a form of prevention against damage caused by earthquakes. Cement production is the biggest contributor to global warming, namely 1 ton of CO2 residue per 1 ton of OPC production. So environmentally friendly material innovation is needed in the field of materials engineering, namely using fly ash as a binder to replace cement as well as using waste. The concentration of alkali activator greatly influences the strength of the mortar. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct research to determine the characteristics of geopolymer mortar with certain variations of activator so that information about the optimum mixture can be obtained and the compressive strength and porosity values of lightweight geopolymer mortar can be determined. This research aims to determine the effect of varying levels of activator (NaOH) in a mixture of light geopolymer mortar with varying concentrations of 7 M, 8M, 9M, and 10M on the compressive strength and porosity of light geopolymer mortar. The number of 5 cm x 5 cm x 5 cm cube test objects was 48 for testing compressive strength and porosity. Testing uses a Testing Machine and scales with wire baskets. The research results show that the greater the molarity of NaOH, the greater the compressive strength value. In light geopolymer mortar with 7 molarity the average compressive strength is 0.4 MPa, while at 8 molarity the compressive strength value is 0.87 MPa, at 9 molarity it is 1.70 MPa, at 10 molarity it is 2.27 MPa. So it was found that the highest compressive strength was when using NaOH of 10 molarity. On the other hand, the higher the molarity, the lower the porosity value. In light geopolymer mortar with 7 molarity the average compressive strength is 35.225%, while at 8 molarity the compressive strength value is 28.025%, at 9 molarity it is 26.269%, at 10 molarity it is 26.172%. So it was found that the highest porosity value was when NaOH was used at 7 molarity.

References

[1] M. W. Tjaronge, M. A. Caronge, and N. Basir, “Karakteristik Mortar Berbahan Limbah Plastik Polypropylene (PP) dan Abu Sekam Padi,” in Seminar Nasional Tahunan VI, 2019, pp. 1–9.

[2] M. M. Hossain, M. R. Karim, M. Hasan, M. K. Hossain, and M. F. M. Zain, “Durability of Mortar and Concrete Made Up of Pozzolans As a Partial Replacement of Cement: A Review,” Constr Build Mater, vol. 116, pp. 128–140, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.147.

[3] M. Y. Karya, E. E. Hangge, and J. J. S. Pah, “Pengaruh Penggantian Semen Oleh Abu Sabut Buah Saboak Terhadap Kekuatan Mortar,” Jurnal Teknik Sipil, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 155–162, 2018.

[4] P. Yoosuk, C. Suksiripattanapong, P. Sukontasukkul, and P. Chindaprasirt, “Properties of Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Cellular Lightweight High Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Mortar,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 15, pp. 1–13, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00730.

[5] A. İ. Çelik et al., “Use of Waste Glass Powder Toward More Sustainable Geopolymer Concrete,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 24, pp. 8533–8546, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.094.

[6] B. Meskhi et al., “Analytical Review of Geopolymer Concrete: Retrospective and Current Issues,” Materials, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1–40, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/ma16103792.

[7] A. L. Almutairi, B. A. Tayeh, A. Adesina, H. F. Isleem, and A. M. Zeyad, “Potential Applications of Geopolymer Concrete in Construction: A Review,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 15, pp. 1–20, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00733.

[8] M. C. Acar, A. İ. Çelik, R. Kayabaşı, A. Şener, N. Özdöner, and Y. O. Özkılıç, “Production of Perlite-Based-Aerated Geopolymer Using Hydrogen Peroxide As Eco-Friendly Material for Energy-Efficient Buildings,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 24, pp. 81–99, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.02.179.

[9] Y. O. Özkılıç et al., “The Use of Crushed Recycled Glass for Alkali Activated Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete and Prediction of Its Capacity,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 24, pp. 8267–8281, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.079.

[10] P. Nuaklong, P. Jongvivatsakul, T. Pothisiri, V. Sata, and P. Chindaprasirt, “Influence of Rice Husk Ash on Mechanical Properties and Fire Resistance of Recycled Aggregate High-Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete,” J Clean Prod, vol. 252, pp. 1–10, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119797.

[11] D. Hardjito, S. E. Wallah, D. M. J. Sumajouw, and B. V. Rangan, “On the Development of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete,” ACI Mater J, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 467–472, 2004.

[12] ASTM C618-03, Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete. 2005. doi: 10.1063/1.4756275.

[13] A. Tata, M. Ikbal, M. A. Sultan, K. Kusnadi, and F. Darwis, “Pengaruh Rasio Binder Dan Pasir Batu Apung Terhadap Sifat Mekanis Mortar Geopolimer,” SIPILsains, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2024.

[14] ASTM C642-97, Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete, no. March. 1997. doi: 10.1520/C0642-13.5.

[15] C. D. Budh and N. R. Warhade, “Effect of Molarity on Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Mortar,” International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 83–86, 2014, [Online]. Available: http://www.ripublication.com/ijcer.htm

Downloads

Published

2025-06-13