PERAN GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP KECURANGAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN: PERSPEKTIF FRAUD PENTAGON PADA KEMENTERIAN DAN LEMBAGA PEMERINTAH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30595/kompartemen.v21i1.16531Keywords:
Fraud, Fraud Pentagon Model, Financial Statement Fraud, Good Corporate GovernanceAbstract
This study aims to examine the impact of fraud pentagon model elements on financial statement fraud and analyze the role of good corporate governance in moderating fraud pentagon model elements on fraudulent financial statements in government ministries and agencies in 2019-2021. The sample was selected based on the purposive sampling method so that 81 Ministries and Government Agencies were obtained with 243 observational data. Based on the panel data test, the results obtained show that rationalization has a significant impact on indications of fraud in financial statements. On the other hand, the factors of pressure, opportunity, competence, and arrogance cannot have a significant impact. The implementation of Good Corporate Governance is proven to moderate the effect of rationalization on the possibility of fraud in financial reportsReferences
ACFE Indonesia. (2016). Survai Fraud Indonesia 2016. Auditor Essentials, 1–60.
Adams, M. B. (1994). Agency Theory and the Internal Audit. Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(8), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686909410071133
Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). Fraud Examination. Mason, Ohio USA: Cengage Learning, 4(1), 88–100.
Alifa, R., & Rahmawati, M. I. (2022). Analisis Teori Hexagon Fraud sebagai Pendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi (JIRA), 11(6).
Angelina, C., & Christian, N. (2022). Analisis teori fraud pentagon S.C.O.R.E method dalam mendeteksi fraud pada laporan keuangan perusahaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(1), 485–497.
Apriliana, S., & Agustina, L. (2017). The Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant through Fraud Pentagon Approach. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 9(2), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v7i1.4036
Ats’tsaqafiyah, I., & Reskino. (2022). Apakah Good Corporate Governance dan Kualitas Audit Berperan Dalam Memoderasi Hubungan Manajemen Laba dan Return Saham Inayah. Journal of Accounting Science and Technology, 2(2), 157–173.
BAI, B., YEN, J., & YANG, X. (2008). FALSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: CHARACTERISTICS OF CHINA’S LISTED COMPANIES AND CART DETECTING APPROACH. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 07(02), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622008002958
Carla, C., & Pangestu, S. (2021). Deteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting Menggunakan Fraud Pentagon. Ultimaccounting : Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 13(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.31937/akuntansi.v13i1.1857
Cressey, D. R. (Donald R. (1953). Other people’s money; a study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.
Dalnial, H., Kamaluddin, A., Sanusi, Z. M., & Khairuddin, K. S. (2014). Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting through Financial Statement Analysis. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 2(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.2.1.17-22
Feddersen, D. (Hrsg. ., & Keuangan, D. A. N. K. (1996). Corporate Governance. 6, 1–26.
Haeli. (2020). Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Good Governance Pada Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat (Studi Kasus). Jurnal Bestari, 1–9.
Haqq, A. P. N. A., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2019). Fraud Pentagon For Detecting Financial Statement Fraud. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 22(3), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v22i3.1788.ABSTRACT
Horwath, C. (2011). The Mind Behind the Fraudsters Crime: Key Behavioral and Environmental Elements. United States of America: Crowe Horwath LLP, 1–62. https://www.fraudconference.com/uploadedFiles/Fraud_Conference
Huang, S. Y., Lin, C. C., Chiu, A. A., & Yen, D. C. (2017). Fraud detection using fraud triangle risk factors. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(6), 1343–1356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9647-9
Indonesia Corruption Watch. (2021). Laporan Tren Penindakan Kasus Korupsi Tahun 2021. Indonesia Corruption Watch, 1–40.
Indra, I. (2020). the Effect of Human Resources and Information Technology on the Revaluation of Government Fixed Assets. Jurnal Tata Kelola Dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 6(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v6i2.469
Juliandi, A., Irfan, I., & Manurung, S. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis, Konsep Dan Aplikasi: Sukses Menulis Skripsi & Tesis Mandiri. In Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis (p. 223).
Juniansyah, I., & Fachriyah, N. (2019). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kualitas Hasil Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara (Studi Kasus pada BPK RI Perwakilan Prov. Kepulauan Bangka Belitung). Jurusan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya Malang, 1971.
Kaminski, K. A., Wetzel, T. S., & Guan, L. (2004). Can financial ratios detect fraudulent financial reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 19, 15–28.
Kusuma, I., Perdana, H. D., & Suranta, S. (2017). Fraudulent Financial Reporting By District / Municipal Government in Indonesia1. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 2(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfj.001.17.02.01.03
Maria, E., & Gudono. (2017). Empirical test of fraud triangle theory on local government (evidence from Indonesia). International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(4), 233–248.
Nichita, A., Batrancea, L., Marcel Pop, C., Batrancea, I., Morar, I. D., Masca, E., Roux-Cesar, A. M., Forte, D., Formigoni, H., & da Silva, A. A. (2019). We Learn Not for School but for Life: Empirical Evidence of the Impact of Tax Literacy on Tax Compliance. Eastern European Economics, 57(5), 397–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2019.1621183
Nuruddinia, M., & Rahmawati, I. P. (2021). Fraud Triangle dan Korupsi Pada Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi & Komputerisasi Akuntansi (JRAK), 12(1), 110–124.
Pamungkas, I. D., Ghozali, I., Achmad, T., Khaddafi, M., & Hidayah, R. (2018). Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Preventing Accounting Fraud: A Study of Fraud Pentagon Model. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences.
Putra, A. R., & Kusnoegroho, Y. A. (2021). Pengujian Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. AFRE (Accounting and Financial Review), 4(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.26905/afr.v4i2.6269
Putra, Y. P. (2021). Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Kinerja Anggaran Aspek Implementasi Pada Satuan Kerja Lingkup Bpkp Ri: Analisis Perbandingan. Jurnal Anggaran Dan Keuangan Negara Indonesia (AKURASI), 3(2), 92–112. https://doi.org/10.33827/akurasi2021.vol3.iss2.art122
Reskino, & Anshori, M. F. (2016). Model Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Triangle. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 95, 256–269. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2016.08.7020
Rohmatin, B. L., Apriyanto, G., & Zuhroh, D. (2021). The Role of Good Corporate Governance to Fraud Prevention: An analysis based on the Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 25(2), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v25i2.5554
Sari, S. P., & Khoiriah, N. (2021). Hexagon Fraud Detection of Regional Government Financial Statement as A Fraud Prevention on The Pandemic Crisis Era. Wacana.Ub.Ac.Id, 24(2), 90–96. https://wacana.ub.ac.id/index.php/wacana/article/view/897
Sawaka K., I. G. N. H. (2020). Fraud pentagon theory in detecting financial perception of financial reporting with good corporate governance as moderator variable. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v7n1.824
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 34(7), 700–701. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-06-2013-0079
Shelton, A. M. (2014). Analysis of Capabilities Attributed to the Fraud Diamond Analysis of Capabilities Attributed to the Fraud Diamond Acct 4018- Senior Honors Seminar.
Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. Advances in Financial Economics, 13(99), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2009)0000013005
Spathis, C. T. (2002). Detecting false financial statements using published data: some evidence from Greece. Managerial Auditing Journal, 17(4), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900210424321
Sukmadilaga, C., Winarningsih, S., Handayani, T., Herianti, E., & Ghani, E. K. (2022). Fraudulent Financial Reporting in Ministerial and Governmental Institutions in Indonesia: An Analysis Using Hexagon Theory. Economies, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10040086
Suyanto, S. (2009). Fraudulent Financial Statement: Evidence from Statement on Auditing Standard No. 99. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 11(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5539
Thamlim, W., & Reskino. (2023). Fraudulent Financial Reporting with Fraud Pentagon Perspective: The Role of Corporate Governance as Moderator. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR), 07(01), 18–38.
Tim Penyusun Standar Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara (SPKN). (2017). Standar Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara (SPKN). BPK Regulation No.1 2017, 107.
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The FWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. (2004) ‘The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud: Certified Public Accountant’, The CPA Journal, 74(12), pp. 38–42. doi: DOI:raud Diamond : Considering the Four ElemWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.
Yesiariani, M., & Rahayu, I. (2017). Deteksi financial statement fraud: Pengujian dengan fraud diamond. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 21(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol21.iss1.art5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
License
1. License to Publish
The article will be governed by the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). The author hereby grants Kompartemen an exclusive publishing and distribution license in the manuscript include tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript (the “Article”) in print, electronic and all other media (whether now known or later developed), in any form, in all languages, throughout the world, for the full term of copyright, and the right to license others to do the same, effective when the article is accepted for publication. This license includes the right to enforce the rights granted hereunder against third parties.
2. Author’s Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale, and
The right to self-archive the article.
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
6. Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by Kompartemen or its sublicensee.
7. Miscellaneous
Kompartemen will publish the article (or have it published) in the Journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and Kompartemen or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Kompartemen Experiences may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage that it deems appropriate.
