“KA’EN KELUN BA MALU” IN DISTRIBUTION OF CULTURE AND LEVEL OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION

Authors

  • Imelda Nahak Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/jssh.v3i2.5056

Keywords:

culture, participation, planning, village development

Abstract

Community participation is very important and contributes to the effectiveness of the resulting development planning. However, until now community participation has not been realized ideally. Previous studies have offered various efforts to increase community participation, namely increased local community initiatives (Muhlinghaus & Walty, 2001), development of government and community cooperation (Pandey & Miznikov, 2001), integration of art and planning (Burford, Kissmann, Rosado- May, Dzul, & Harder, 2012), optimizing the role of social capital (Cerar, 2014), socialization to the bottom of the community (Defina, 2012), participatory leadership (Alyas, 2015), allocation of village funds (Atmojo, Eko, Fridayani, Kasiwi, & Pratama, 2017) and optimizing the role of young people as mobilizers (Fitriani, Selinaswati, & Mardiah, 2017). Unfortunately, there has not been an assessment effort that looks at the cultural side. This qualitative case study examines efforts to increase community participation by considering cultural factors that can contribute to the effectiveness of development planning at the village level. Data obtained through in-depth interviews, participant observation and documentation. This study found that the culture factor of mamfatin ukunrai could inhibit community participation in Naran Village. The community believes that planning development is the duty of the government so that it should not actively participate in planning meetings. Therefore, the researcher offers a model of the family code as an effort to reduce the impact of the culture. Ka'en kelun ba ashamed to represent the government's invitation to cooperate with the community for the realization of development from the ground level.

References

Alyas. (2015). Lurah dan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembangunan di Kelurahan Cabenge Kecamatan Lilirilau Kabupaten Soppeng. Sosiohumaniora, 17(1), 84–96.

Atmojo, Eko, M., Fridayani, H. D., Kasiwi, A. N., & Pratama, M. A. (2017). Efektivitas dana desa untuk pengembangan potensi ekonomi berbasis partisipasi masyarakat di Desa Bangunjiwo Muhammad Eko Atmojo , Helen Dian Fridayani , Aulia Nur Kasiwi , Mardha Adhi Pratama Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan , FISIP Univeristas Muhammadiya. ARIST Sosial Politik Humaniora, 5(1), 126–140.

Burford, G., Kissmann, S., Rosado-May, F. J., Dzul, S. H. A., & Harder, M. K. (2012). Indigenous Participation in Intercultural Education. Ecology and Society, 17(4). Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26269242

Cerar, A. (2014). From reaction to initiative: Potentials of contributive participation. Urbani Izziv, 25(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2014-25-01-002

Defina. (2012). The Community Participation and Socialization in Empowering Program ( PPMK ) at Klender Village. Penyuluhan, 9(2).

Fitriani, E., Selinaswati, & Mardiah, D. (2017). Partisipasi Asyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Ekowisata Sungai Pinang. Socius, 4(1), 83–96.

Iswahyudi, F. (2012). EFEKTIFITAS PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM PERBAIKAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK (Studi Kasus Pelaksanaan Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Nomor 13 Tahun 2009 tentang Pedoman Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik dengan Partisipasi Masyarakat pada Dinas. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 8(3), 310–340.

Mbeche, R. (2017). Climbing The Ladder of Participation Symbolic or Subtantive Representation in Preparing Uganda for REDD+. Conservation and Society, 15(4), 426–438. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs

Muhlinghaus, S., & Walty, S. (2001). Endogenous development in Swiss mountain communities: Local initiatives in Urnasch and Schamserberg. Mountain Research and Development, 21(3), 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2001)021{[}0236:EDISMC]2.0.CO;2

Ompusunggu, V. (2017). Peranan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Desa. Jurnal Sektor Publik, 10(1), 95–102. Retrieved from http://pep3d.jabarprov.go.id/index.php/berita/artikel/77-peranan-partisipasi-masyarakat-dalam-perencanaan-pembangunan-desa

Pandey, K., & Miznikov, Y. (2001). Decentralization and Corruption. Mountain Research and Development, 21(October), 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2004.11051256

Rostam, N. G., Ansari, M., & Vinejad, M. M. (2018). A Scientometric Review of Citizen Participation Research World Trend. Theoretical and Empirical Research in Urban Management, 13(3), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2010-21-02-006

Rumensten, I. (2012). Model Ideal Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Sagita, N. I. (2016). Partisipasi Warga Masyarakat Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Kecamatan Di Kota Bandung. CosmoGov, 2(2), 308–329. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v2i2.10009

Yin, Robert K. (2015). Studi Kasus : Desain dan Metode. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada

Downloads

Published

2019-11-15

How to Cite

Nahak, I. (2019). “KA’EN KELUN BA MALU” IN DISTRIBUTION OF CULTURE AND LEVEL OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION. JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial Dan Humaniora), 3(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.30595/jssh.v3i2.5056