Legal Protection to the Auction Winner with Good Intentions of Mortgage Rights on Grosse Minutes of Auction Number 780/14/2019
Abstract
The government has provided legal protection to auction winners who take part in the auction with good intentions and in line with the rules, including those that are specifically regulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Finance Number 27/PMK.06/2016 concerning Auction Implementation Guidelines. The auction winner of Grosse Minutes of Auction Number: 780/44/2019 felt helpless and burdened by not being able to own the tangible object of what he purchased in the auction because the previous owner or mortgage giver objected to emptying the tangible object voluntarily. This problem made the auction winner burdened to forcibly vacate the tangible object from the auction he won and results in new legal actions. This research was conducted through library research to collect secondary data from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The owner of the Grosse Minutes of Auction number 780/44/2019, who won this auction and had good intentions, should be provided legal protection. This is done to uphold the principles of justice and give the auction winner legal security over his ownership of the tangible auction objects (land and building) that had been purchased. Article 1977, paragraph 1, of the Civil Code (hereafter referred to as the Civil Code) provides legal protection for purchasers who have good intentions. In essence, this article protects purchasers of movable property. According to Article 1977, paragraph 1 of the Civil Code, whoever controls movable property that is not in the form of interest and receivables that are not required to be paid to the bearer is declared to be the ownerKeywords: Legal Protection, Auction Winner, Grosse Minutes of AuctionÂ
Keywords :
There is no Figure or data content available for this article
References
Agung Darmawan, Jayanti, Offi, 2018, “Pelaksanaan Lelang Tanah Jaminan Yang Terikat Hak Tanggungan” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro 20, No. 3, hlm 465.
Amin Purnawan, Catur Budi Dianawati. 2017. “Kajian Hukum Jaminan Hak Tanggungan yang Dilelang Tanpa Proses Permohonan Lelang Eksekusi Ke Ketua Pengadilan Negeri”, Jurnal Akta. Volume 4. Nomor 2. hlm. 127.
Carina Mboeik, Megarisa, 2016, Hak Sempurna Yang Melekat Pada Pemenang Lelang (Lelang Benda Tidak Bergerak/Tanah), Jakarta: artikel.
Fahmi Zaki, Begiyama. 2016. “Kepastian Hukum Dalam Pelelangan Obyek Hak Tanggungan Secara Online”. Fiat Justitia. Volume 10. Nomor 2. hlm. 372.
Harun, Badriyah, 2010, Penyelesaian Sengketa Kredit Bermasalah, Yogyakarta : PT. Pustaka Yustisia.
HS, Salim. 2013. Penerapan Hukum pada Penelitian Tesis dan Desertasi. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo.
Khaleed, Badriyah. 2014. Legislative Drafting Teori dan Praktik Penyusunan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Yogyakarta: Medpress Digital.
Lukito, Suparmono, 2012, Praktek Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Dalam Kredit Perbankan, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.
Megarisa Carina, Mboeik, 2019. "Hak Sempurna Yang Melekat Pada Pemenang Benda Tidak Bergerak." Jurnal Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama Surabaya 1, No. 2. hlm 137.
Muhammad, Faisal, 2014, “Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Pemenang Lelang Sebagai Pembeli Beritikad Baik Terhadap Putusan Re-Eksekusi.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Pemerhati dan Praktisi Hukum 44, No. 1, hlm, 84.
Michel Huberman, Mathew, Miles. 2014. Analisis Data Kualitatif : Buku Sumber tentang Metode-metode Baru. Jakarta : UI Pres.
Rahadi, Abdulah 2011, Prosedur Hukum Lelang Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Hak Tanggungan, Jakarta : Refika Aditama.
Ruslina, Elli. 2012. Makna Pasal 33 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Dalam Pembangunan Hukum Ekonomi Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi. Volume 9, Nomor 1. hlm. 50
S. Meliala, Djaja, 1987, Masalah Itikad Baik Dalam KUH Perdata, Bandung: Binacipta.
Soedewi M.S, Sri. 2011. Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia Pokok-Pokok Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Perorangan. Yogyakarta : Liberty Offset.
Usman, Rachmadi. 2011. Hukum Kebendaan. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.
Wawancara dengan Pak Doni Indarto, Kepala Seksi Hukum dan Informasi KPKNL Purwokerto, Pada hari Selasa 15 Maret 2022 pukul 10.00.WIB.
Wawancara dengan Astawi,S.H. Panitera Pengadilan Negeri Banyumas, Pada hari Selasa 8 Maret 2022 Pukul 11:00.WIB.
Yahya Harahap, M. 2002, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Zulkifli, Suhaila. 2018. Tinjauan Tentang Pelaksanaan Lelang Atas Agunan Hak Tanggungan Dalam Perkara Kredit Macet (Studi Putusan Nomor 86/PDT/2015/PT.MDN). Jurnal Hukum KAIDAH, Vol 12 No.02, hlm. 7
How to Cite This
Copyright and Permissions
Authors who publish with Kosmik Hukum agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


