1091
Abstract Views
1187
PDF Download
ARTICLE

Kontroversi Pinjaman Online Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Moral

Ratna Kartikawati , Indonesia Correspondence [email protected]
,
Soediro Soediro Fakultas Hukum UMP Correspondence [email protected]
Pages 246-267
Browse this journal

Abstract

This research is motivated by the rise of online loan cases, online easy credit loans are currently being favored by the public because the process is easy and very helpful when there is an urgent need, while funds do not yet exist. at the bank. On the other hand, this online loan does not guarantee the confidentiality of customer data and does not protect customers from illegal debt collection practices. The purpose of this study was to obtain findings about the Online Loan Controversy from a Moral Perspective. The research will be conducted with a qualitative approach. The subjects in this study were credit customers in Purwokerto. Subjects were determined based on purposive sampling based on the characteristics of borrowing customers. The data collection method used: (1) in-depth interviews, (2) Focus Group Discussions/FGDs, conducted to collect information about the Online Loan Controversy Viewed from a Moral Perspective, its advantages and disadvantages, as well as important opinions and useful input in evaluating the Online Loan Controversy. Moral Perspective. Data analysis in this study uses an interactive model from Miles and Hubermans through the stages of data reduction, data presentation and verification. Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be seen that the selection of loans in borrowing by consumers is based on the compulsion and urgent need of consumers to fulfill their daily needs. These actions are actions that are not based on moral considerations, consumers do not consider on the basis of right and wrong, inappropriate and unfair. can provide loan installments, the consequences that arise are 2 (two), namely; The customer will be given the option to make a loan again with a nominal above the loan and must close the previous loan accompanied by a guarantee that will be agreed upon. Second, the loan will take valuables if the customer is unable to pay the agreed loan installments or if the agreement has stated the object of the guarantee, the guarantee belongs to the loan completelyKeywords: Juridical, Moral Judgment, Online Loas

Keywords :

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

There is no Supplemental content for this article.

How to Cite This

Kartikawati, R., & Soediro, S. (2022). Kontroversi Pinjaman Online Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Moral. Kosmik Hukum, 22(3), 246–267. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v22i3.15649

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Verify authenticity via CrossMark

Copyright and Permissions

Authors who publish with Kosmik Hukum agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Data Availability

All data generated during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].
 

template

sertifikat