1. Home
  2. Vol 23, No 1 (2023)
  3. Pratama

Juridical Analysis of PKPU Decision by The Court on Application for PKPU Revocation by The Debitor

Nandi Pratama, Mohamad Fajri Mekka Putra

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to find out how the judge's consideration in revoking the Delay of Debt Payment Obligation on the request of the debtor who has been determined to be Debt Payment Suspension, but there are findings of the calculation of the management team of Debt Payment Delay which states that the assets (Activa) of the debtor are still larger. of obligations (liabilites) so as to ask the Court to revoke the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations. In addition, it is necessary to know how the legal impact that will be received by debtors and creditors on Decision Number: 53/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. This study applies a normative juridical research method that makes court decisions as primary legal material and occupies a position after legislation. The primary legal data or materials analyzed in this study are court decisions, namely Decision Number: 53/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst dated April 12, 2021 and Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations. Based on this research, it can be concluded that the application submitted by the debtor in the revocation of the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations is appropriate because the revocation of the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations is carried out by the Court based on the provisions stipulated in Article 295 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement Obligation for Payment of Debt, so that the Central Jakarta District Court has the authority to revoke the Suspension of Obligation for Payment of Debt at the request of the debtor.

Keywords: Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations; Revoke PKPU; Bankruptcy; Commercial Court.


References


Aji, Wahyu Pratama. “Legal Discourse of United States Pharmaceutical Industry Mandatory License and Trips Agreement Post Doha Declaration” 2, no. February (2022): 1–13.

Christiani Filia, Djumikasih, dan Herlin Wijayanti, Konsistensi Pengaturan Imbalan Kurator dalam Pasal 2 Ayat (1) Huruf C Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Ham Nomor 1 tahun 2013 dan Pasal 17 Ayat (3) Undang-undang Nomor 37 tahun 2004, Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum Brawijaya.

Efendi Joenardi, Johnny Ibrahim, Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Prenadamedia Group: Jakarta, 2016.

Hadi Subhan, M., Hukum Kepailitan:Prinsip, Norma dan Praktik di Peradilan, Kencana: Jakarta, 2009.

Hafidz, Muhammad. “Juridical Review on Termination of Employment As the Company Is in the State of Postponing Its Debt Payment Obligation.” Nurani Hukum 4 (2021): 38.

Johan, Suwinto. “Separatist Creditors Problems on Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Based on the Supreme Court’s Decree Number 30/KMA/SK/I/2020.” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 3 (2021): 207–220.

Manurung, Bicar Franki Leonardo, Elza Syarief, and Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah. “Legal Consequences of Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations: Are They Similar?” Journal of Law and Policy Transformation 7, no. 1 (2022): 85–96.

Marzuki Peter Mahmud ,Penelitian Hukum, Kharisma Putra Utama: Jakarta, 2010.

Mochtar Zainal Arifin dan Eeddy O.S. Hiariej, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum, Yogyakarta, 2021.

Nuriskia, Centia Sabrina, and Ahmad Yoga Novaliansyah. “The Urgency of Regulations Revision Related to Filing Bankruptcy and Postponing Debt Payment Obligations Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Lex Scientia Law Review 5, no. 2 (2021): 105–122.

Nurudin, Agus. “Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payments for Large Companies.” International Journal of Economics and Business Administration 8, no. 2 (2020): 388–395.

S.W. Sumardjono Maria, Pedoman Pembuatan Usulan Penuisan: Sebuah Panduan Dasar, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1997.

Sinaga Syamsudin M., Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia, Tatanusa: Jakarta, 2012.

Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, ”Hukum Kepailitan: Memahami Faillisementverordening Juncto Undang-Undan Nomor 4 Tahun 1998”, Pustaka Utama Grafiti: Jakarta, 2002.

Tan, Kendry. “Preventing Debtor Bankruptcy during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Benefits of Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations & Insolvency Test?” Journal of Judicial Review 24, no. 2 (2023): 305–318.

Wigyosubroto Sutandyo, Hukum, Paradigma, Metode dan Dinamika masalahnya, Huma: Jakarta, 2002.

Yahanan Annalisa, “Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang :Alternatif Penyelesaian Utang Piutang”, UNSRI: Palembang, 2007.

Yani Ahmad dan Gunawan Widjaja, “Seri Hukum Bisnis Kepailitan”, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada:Jakarta, 2002.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v23i1.16969

ISSN: 2655-9242