Abstract

Law enforcement against narcotics trafficking is certainly a significant element in efforts to eradicate narcotics crimes. So it is interesting to observe the extent to which the perpetrators who cooperated in committing criminal acts of buying and selling narcotics were arrested, prosecuted and tried. This study aims to answer the problem of accountability of each perpetrator who cooperates in committing a criminal act of buying and selling narcotics and regarding the occurrence of criminal disparities in the case of cooperating to commit narcotics crimes by analyzing the legal considerations of the panel of judges, as well as answering the problem of criminal disparities in cases of cooperating to commit narcotics crimes based on the perspective of legal objectives. This research uses normative legal research methods. The results showed that, in the case of criminal acts of buying and selling narcotics with the inclusion of responsibility of the perpetrators, it must be proven whether as a pleger  (the main perpetrator), or  a medepleger (a person who participates). Because if it is not proven in the trial, it will have an impact on the unaccountability of the perpetrator. So the situation does not reflect justice and legal certainty. the concrete form of criminal liability is the imposition of punishment by the Panel of Judges in the form of imprisonment and fines, defendants who commit the same crime or the level of seriousness that can be equalized, are still sentenced to varying or different crimes. So that disparity in conviction becomes a phenomenon of injustice if the judge does not clearly provide a strong reason for distinguishing the sentence for the defendant in the case of cooperating in the criminal act of buying and selling narcotics.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

• Anggraeny, Kurnia Dewi, Disparitas Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pisikotropika Di Pengadilan Negeri Sleman, Jurnal Hukum Novelty, Vol. 7 No. 2 Agustus 2016.

  Arief, Barda Nawawi, Kebijakan Legislatif Dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Dengan Pidana Penjara, (Semarang: BP UNDIP, 1994).

  Bertin, Analisis Disparitas Pidana Dalam Kasus Perkosaan, Jurnal Katalogis, Volume 4 Nomor 11, November 2016.

  Claudio A. Kermite, Delik Permufakatan Jahat Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Dan Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Lex Crimen Vol. VI, No. 4, Juni 2017.

  Firman Floranta Adonara, Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 12, Nomor 2, Juni 2015

  Harkrisnowo, Harkristuti, dalam Eva Achjani, Proporsionalitas Penjatuhan Pidana, Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Tahun ke-41 No. 2 April-Juni 2011.

  Harkristuti Harkrisnowo, Rekonstruksi Konsep Pemidanaan: Suatu Gugatan Terhadap Proses Legislasi dan Pemidanaan di Indonesia, Orasi Pengukuhan Guru Besar di Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 2003

  Hayat, Keadilan Sebagai Prinsip Negara Hukum: Tinjauan Teoritis Dalam Konsep Demokrasi, Pajajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 2 Nomor 2 ,2015.

  Hodio Potimbang, Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Dalam Sistem Peradilam Pidana, Varia Peradilan(Jakarta, November 2013).

  Kurnia Dewi Anggraeny, Disparitas Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pisikotropika Di Pengadilan Negeri Sleman, Jurnal Hukum Novelty, Vol. 7 No. 2 Agustus 2016.

  Lotulung, Paulus E., Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Sistim Penegakan Hukum, Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar Pembangunan Hukum Nasional VIII yang diselenggarakan oleh Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional di Denpasar Pada tanggal 14-18 Juli 2003.

  M. Khalid Ali, Kajian Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, jurnal ilmiah : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Sunan Giri Malang.

  Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana, (Bandung: Alumni, 2005).

  Muladi, dalam Eva Achjani, Proporsionalitas Penjatuhan Pidana, Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Tahun ke-41 No. 2 April-Juni 2011.

  Muladi, Dwidja Priyanto, Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi dalam Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung, 1991.

  Prasetyo, Teguh, Kriminalisasi Dalam Hukum Pidana, (Bandung: Nusa Medina, 2010).

  Roeslan Saleh, Pikiran-Pikiran Tentang PertanggungJawaban Pidana, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1982.

  Soedjono Dirdjosisworo, Narkoba dan peradilannya di Indonesia, Jakarta: O.C. Kaligis & Associates, 2006

  Syamsu, Muhammad Ainul, Pergeseran Turut Serta Melakukan dalam Ajaran Penyertaan (Telaah Kritis Berdasarkan Teori Pemisahan Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana), (Jakarta: Kencana, 2014)

How to Cite This

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Copyright and Permissions

Authors who publish with Kosmik Hukum agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Data Availability