Judicial Transformation: Integration of AI Judges in Innovating Indonesia's Criminal Justice System
Abstract
In the midst of the current digital era, artificial intelligence (AI) technology offers the potential to improve many aspects of life, including in the field of justice. In this context, the idea of integrating AI into the judicial system emerges as one potential solution. AI judges, as a concept, are considered capable of providing more objective decisions, speeding up court proceedings, and reducing the workload of human judges. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential and challenges in the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into the Indonesian judicial system, with the ultimate goal of creating a judicial system that is more fair, efficient, and in accordance with Indonesia's socio-cultural context. This research utilizes normative legal methods by adopting statutory, conceptual, comparative, and futuristic approaches. The nature of this research is descriptive-prescriptive. The data that has been collected is analyzed using the content analysis method. The result of this research is that "AI Judges" has the potential to be a very useful tool in Indonesia's criminal justice system in the future. However, the integration of AI must be done carefully, taking into account all the benefits and risks, and ensuring that justice and humanity remain at the core of the system. In addition, inter-sectoral cooperation and a deep understanding of the local context are key to the success of this integration. In an overall perspective, while AI technology promises greater efficiency and objectivity in the justice system, the essence of humanity and cultural considerations remain irreplaceable aspects. Thus, it is hoped that in the future, collaboration between AI judges and human judges can create a justice system that is more fair, efficient, and in accordance with Indonesia's socio-cultural context.
Keywords: Judicial Transformation, AI Intergration, AI Judges, Criminal Justice Reform
References
Anthony, Theressa Gracita. “Peluang AI Menggeser Posisi Hakim di Pengadilan.” https://www.kompasiana.com/. Last modified 2023. Diakses Juli 23, 2023. https://www.kompasiana.com/theressa81907/646a2e7437cb2a6e5a7f0f92/peluang-ai-menggeser-posisi-hakim-di-pengadilan
Ariawan, I Gusti Ketut. “Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif.” Kertha Widya 1, no. 1 (Desember 31, 2013): 21–30. Diakses Oktober 5, 2022. https://ejournal.unipas.ac.id/index.php/KW/article/view/419. Doi. https://doi.org/10.37637/KW.V1I1.419
Bahrini, Aram, Mohammadsadra Khamoshifar, Hossein Abbasimehr, Robert J. Riggs, Maryam Esmaeili, Rastin Mastali Majdabadkohne, dan Morteza Pasehvar. “ChatGPT: Applications, Opportunities, and Threats.” 2023 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, SIEDS 2023 (April 14, 2023): 274–279. Diakses Juli 19, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09103v1. Doi. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS58326.2023.10137850
Cheryl Patriana Yuswar. “AI sebagai Hakim, Dapat Hilangkan Putusan Pengadilan yang Bias?” https://kumparan.com/. Last modified 2023. https://kumparan.com/cherylyuswar/ai-sebagai-hakim-dapat-hilangkan-putusan-pengadilan-yang-bias-1zeEkB4MfXu/full
Chowdhury, Tanay, dan John Oredo. “AI Ethical Biases: Normative and Information Systems Development Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Decision Systems (April 20, 2022): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2022.2062849. Doi. https://doi.org/0.1080/12460125.2022.2062849
Ferinda K Fachri. “Kembangkan Aplikasi Penunjukan Majelis, MA Gunakan Artificial Intelligence.” https://www.hukumonline.com/. Last modified 2023. Diakses Juli 23, 2023. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/kembangkan-aplikasi-penunjukan-majelis--ma-gunakan-artificial-intelligence-lt63f4542d35bf3/
Herlambang et al. “Kejahatan Memperkaya Diri Sendiri Secara Melawan Hukum (Illicit Enrichment) Dan Aparatur Sipil Negara: Sebuah Kajian Kritis.” RechtsVinding 11, no. 2 (2022): 247–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v11i2
Liu, Hin-Yan, Matthijs Maas, John Danaher, Luisa Scarcella, Michaela Lexer, dan Leonard Van Rompaey. “Artificial Intelligence and Legal Disruption: a New Model for Analysis.” Law, Innovation and Technology 12, no. 2 (Juli 2, 2020): 205–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2020.1815402
Matta, Vic, Gaurav Bansal, Francis Akakpo, Stacie Christian, Seema Jain, Drew Poggemann, John Rousseau, dan Edward Ward. “Diverse Perspectives on Bias in AI.” Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research 24, no. 2 (April 3, 2022): 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2022.2095776
Mulianingsih, Ferani, Khoirul Anwar, Fitri Amalia Shintasiwi, dan Anggi Jazilatur Rahma. “Artificial Intellegence Dengan Pembentukan Nilai Dan Karakter Di Bidang Pendidikan.” IJTIMAIYA: Journal of Social Science Teaching 4, no. 2 (2020): 148–154. Doi. https://doi.org/10.21043/ji.v4i2.8625
Müller, Vincent C. “Risks of General Artificial Intelligence.” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence. Taylor & Francis, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2014.895110
Nadia Intan Fajarlie. “Daftar Panjang Hakim-hakim yang Terjerat Kasus Korupsi, dari Pengadilan Negeri hingga Mahkamah Agung.” https://www.kompas.tv/nasional/331194/daftar-panjang-hakim-hakim-yang-terjerat-kasus-korupsi-dari-pengadilan-negeri-hingga-mahkamah-agung. Last modified 2022. Diakses Juli 23, 2023. https://www.kompas.tv/nasional/331194/daftar-panjang-hakim-hakim-yang-terjerat-kasus-korupsi-dari-pengadilan-negeri-hingga-mahkamah-agung
Ngafifi, Muhamad. “Kemajuan Teknologi Dan Pola Hidup Manusia Dalam Perspektif Sosial Budaya.” Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi 2, no. 1 (2014): 33–47. Doi. https://doi.org/10.21831/jppfa.v2i1.2616
Nurhalimah, Siti. “Integritas Hakim Indonesia.” ’Adalah 1, no. 2 (2018): 15–16. Doi. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v1i2.8205
Nuryanto, Adi. “Tantangan Administrasi Publik di Dunia Artificial Intelligence dan Bot.” Jejaring Administrasi Publik 12, no. 2 (2021): 139–147. Doi https://doi.org/10.21831/jppfa.v2i1.2616
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 2005.
Rahayu, Mustaghfiroh. “Keragaman di Indonesia dan Politik Pengakuan (Suatu Tinjauan Kristis).” Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi 4, no. 2 (2017): 1–18. Doi. https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v4i2.28577
Realing, A. D.Dory. “Courts and Artificial Intelligence.” International Journal for Court Administration 11, no. 2 (2020): 1–10. Doi. https://doi.org/10.36745/IJCA.343
Rompis, Tonny. “Kajian Sosiologi Hukum Tentang Menurunnya Kepercayaan Masyarakat Terhadap Hukum Dan Aparat Penegak Hukum Di Sulawesi Utara.” Lex Crimen 4, no. 8 (2015): 166–176. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/10302
Saskia Dinda Ratna Pratiwi. “Mungkinkah Profesi Hakim dan Pengacara di Indonesia Akan Digantikan dengan Artificial Intelligence (AI)?” https://heylaw.id/. Last modified 2023. Diakses Juli 23, 2023. https://heylaw.id/blog/mungkinkah-profesi-hakim-dan-pengacara-di-indonesia-akan-digantikan-dengan-artificial-intelligence-ai
Syakirun Ni’am. “Hakim Agung Gazalba Saleh Diduga Terima Gratifikasi Puluhan Miliar, Diubah Jadi Aset.” https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2023/03/22/17135791/hakim-agung-gazalba-saleh-diduga-terima-gratifikasi-puluhan-miliar-diubah. Last modified 2023. Diakses Juli 23, 2023. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2023/03/22/17135791/hakim-agung-gazalba-saleh-diduga-terima-gratifikasi-puluhan-miliar-diubah
Wahyu Sibarani. “China Gunakan Kecerdasan Buatan agar Hakim Pengadilan Berlaku Adil.” https://sains.sindonews.com/. Last modified 2022. Diakses Juli 23, 2023. https://sains.sindonews.com/read/827765/768/china-gunakan-kecerdasan-buatan-agar-hakim-pengadilan-berlaku-adil-1657894044
Watamura, Eiichiro, Tomohiro Ioku, Tomoya Mukai, dan Michio Yamamoto. “Empathetic Robot Judge, We Trust You.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction (Juli 11, 2023): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2232982
Xu, Zichun. “Human Judges in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Challenges and Opportunities.” Applied Artificial Intelligence 36, no. 1 (Desember 31, 2022): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2021.2013652
Xu, Zichun, Yang Zhao, dan Zhongwen Deng. “The Possibilities and Limits of AI in Chinese Judicial Judgment.” AI and Society 37, no. 4 (Desember 1, 2022): 1601–1611. Diakses Juli 23, 2023. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-021-01250-9
Yalcin, Gizem, Erlis Themeli, Evert Stamhuis, Stefan Philipsen, dan Stefano Puntoni. “Perceptions of Justice by Algorithms.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 31, no. 2 (Juni 1, 2023): 269–292. Diakses Juli 23, 2023. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10506-022-09312-z.
Zahara, Sofi Liza, Zahira Ula Azkia, dan Muhammad Minan Chusni. “Implementasi Teknologi Artificial Intelligence (AI) dalam Bidang Pendidikan.” Jurnal Penelitian Sains dan Pendidikan (JPSP) 3, no. 1 (2023): 15–20. Doi. https://doi.org/10.23971/jpsp.v3i1.4022
Završnik, Aleš. “Criminal justice, artificial intelligence systems, and human rights.” ERA Forum 20, no. 4 (2020): 567–583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00602-0
Zhang, Ke, dan Ayse Begum Aslan. “AI Technologies for Education: Recent Research & Future Directions.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2 (Januari 1, 2021): 1–11. Doi. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEAI.2021.100025
Zico Junius Fernando et al. “The Freedom of Expression in Indonesia.” Cogent Social Sciences 8, no. 1 (2022): 1–11. Doi. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2103944
DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v23i3.18711
ISSN: 2655-9242