Abstract
The implementation of restorative justice in the Indonesian Police Force is conducted by settling the case in the preliminary investigation and investigation stage. There are material requirements that should be fulfilled one of which is that the case is not a recidivism based on a verdict. In practice, this requirement remains unclear. For instance, an issue will arise when a perpetrator who committed a theft then settled with a restorative justice mechanism in a police station but then caught for committing another theft. The problem that emerges is whether the second offense can be still solved by restorative justice in police stations. Considering that one of the material requirements is that the case is not a recidivism according to the court’s verdict whilst restorative justice settlement is not counted as a verdict. This issue requires reinterpretation so that the implementation of restorative justice can provide justice for all parties. The purpose of this research is to re-interpret clearly material requirements in terms of not repeating criminal acts based on judicial decisions for the future implementation of restorative justice in the police station. The research method employs a normative juridical with cases approach whilst the data is analyzed descriptively to describe the material requirements in the form of not repeating a crime based on a court decision in the police stage. The results of the study reveal that in practice repetition of criminal acts must be based on court decisions. The police are still implementing restorative justice for the second criminal act with the condition that the victim and the perpetrator have reconciled. Therefore, it is necessary to deconstruct the meaning of not repeating a crime based on a court decision, so that it is not a repetition of a crime that has been resolved by means of restorative justice in the police. This is so that the recovery goals of restorative justice are achieved. Therefore, it is necessary to deconstruct the meaning of not repeating a crime based on a court decision, so that it is not a repetition of a crime that has been resolved by means of restorative justice in the police phase. This deconstruction is important to achieve restorative justice’s goals.
Keywords: crime repetition, restorative justice, Indonesian police force
Keywords :
There is no Figure or data content available for this article
References
Agus Sahbani, “Melihat Pedoman Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif di Pengadilan”, Retrieved from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/melihat-pedoman-penerapan-keadilan-restoratif-di-pengadilan-lt5ff2dc079da4a/, Accessed on June 16, 2023 at 23.30
Agus Tridiatno, Yoachim, Keadilan Restoratif, Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2015
Anthon Freddy Susanto, Semiotika Hukum; dari Dekonstruksi Teks Menuju Progresivitas Makna, Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2005 Cet. 1.
April, Keisha, Shannon W. Schrader, Toni E. Walker, Robert M. Francis, Hector Glynn, and Derrick M. Gordon. “Conceptualizing Juvenile Justice Reform: Integrating the Public Health, Social Ecological, and Restorative Justice Models.” Children and Youth Services Review 148 (May 1, 2023). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106887
Armunanto Hutahean, “Penerapan Restoative Justice oleh Kepolisian Negara RI untuk Mewujudkan Tujuan Hukum”, Jurnal Hukum to-ra, Volume 8 Issue 2, (2022):
Belonosov, V. O. “On the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of the Restorative Justice Movement in Russia.” Juridical Journal of Samara University 8, no. 3 (2022): 61–69. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047X-2022-8-3-61-69
Edi Setia Budi Santoso, “Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Tindak Pidana oleh BHABINKAMTIBMAS POLRI di Provinsi Lampung”, Procceding: Call for Paper national Conference For Law Studies: Pembangunan Hukum Menuju Era Digital Society, (2020): 859-879, 859.
Fazel Seena, Wolf Achim, A Systematic Review of Criminal Recidivism Rates Worldwide: Current Difficulties and Recommendations for Best Practice DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130390
Ferry Fathurokhman, Police-Community Partnership Forum (FKPM) as a means of implementing Restorative Justice Study Case in Lasem, Rembang, Central Java, Indonesia, DOI: https://doi.org/10.17931/ivr2013_wg152_02
Gerson, Janet C. “Restorative Justice and Alternative Systems.” Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, & Conflict: Volume 1-4, Third Edition 4 (January 1, 2022): 125–136.
Hazrati, M., and R. J. Heffron. “Conceptualising Restorative Justice in the Energy Transition: Changing the Perspectives of Fossil Fuels.” Energy Research and Social Science 78 (August 1, 2021). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102115
Hobson, Jonathan, and Brian Payne. “Building Restorative Justice Services: Considerations on Top-down and Bottom-up Approaches.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 71 (December 1, 2022). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100555
I Gusti Ngurah Yoga Nugraha dan I Gusti Ngurah Parwata, “Kualifikasi Syarat Materiel Keadilan Restoratif Berdasarkan Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 6 tahun 2009 Tentang Penyidikan Tindak Pidana”, E-Journal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Wicara, Volume 9 Nomor 11, (2020):
KBBI Daring, Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia, 2016, Versi daring: 3.10.2.1-20230102204913, https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/residivis.
Kirkwood, Steve. “A Practice Framework for Restorative Justice.” Aggression and Violent Behavior 63 (March 1, 2022). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101688
Kristian dan Christine Tanuwijaya, “Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana dengan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif (Restorative Justice) dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu di Indonesia”, Jurnal Mimbar Justitia, Vol. 1 No. 2, (2015), hlm. 598
La Patuju dan Sakticakra Salimin Afamery, “Residivis dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum”, Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, Volume 1 No 1 Desember (2016):104-114, hlm 108.
Long, Ruby, Emily C. Cleveland Manchanda, Annette M. Dekker, Liliya Kraynov, Susan Willson, Pedro Flores, Elizabeth A. Samuels, and Karin Rhodes. “‘Community Engagement via Restorative Justice to Build Equity-Oriented Crisis Standards of Care.’” Journal of the National Medical Association 114, no. 4 (August 1, 2022): 377–389. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2022.02.010
M Friedman, Lawrence, M. Khozim (Penerjemah), Sistem Hukum Perspektif Ilmu Sosial, Bandung: Nusa Media, 2009.
Marder, Ian D. “Mapping Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices in Criminal Justice in the Republic of Ireland.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 70 (September 1, 2022). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100544
Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Penemuan Hukum, Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2014
Mukti Fajar, Yulianto Achmad, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum-Normatif dan Empiris, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2015
Prianter Jaya Hairi, Konsep dan Pembaruan Residivisme dalam Hukum Pidana di Indonesia (Concept and Reform of Recidivism in Criminal Law in Indonesia), Jurnal Negara Hukum, Volume 9 Nomor 2, (2018): 199-216, hlm 120. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v9i2.1048Rahardjo, Satjipto Biarkan Hukum Mengalir: Catatan Kritis tentang Pergulatan Manusia dan Hukum, Jakarta: Kompas, 2007
Rahardjo, Satjipto, Penegakan Hukum Progresif, Jakarta: PT. Kompas Media Nusantara, 2010
Rena Yulia dan Aliyth Prakarsa, “Telaah Yuridis terhadap Pengaturan Restorative Justice di Kepolisian”, Jurnal Wajah Hukum, Volume 5(2), Oktober, (2021) 562-572, 562.
Seo, Chunghyeon, and Nathan E. Kruis. “The Impact of School’s Security and Restorative Justice Measures on School Violence.” Children and Youth Services Review 132 (January 1, 2022). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106305
Strang, Heather, and Lawrence Sherman. “ The Morality of Evidence: The Second Annual Lecture for Restorative Justice: An International Journal .” Restorative Justice 3, no. 1 (January 2015): 6–27. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20504721.2015.1049869
How to Cite This
Article Metrics
Download Statistics
Other Statistics
Copyright and Permissions
Authors who publish with Kosmik Hukum agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Data Availability
template
sertifikat
