Abstract

The research discusses anti-Pancasila offenses in relation to national security and freedom of speech. Focus on the distribution of Communism, Marxism, and Leninism. Three research questions are the harm of spreading anti-Pancasila, the implementation of these offenses in court verdicts, and the formulation of these offenses in the new Penal Code. The research is document research using statutory and case approaches. Harm principles are used to analyze the research problems. Research results show that the distribution of Communism, Marxism, and Leninism has harmed other people, democratic states, and citizen exercising their fundamental rights. The implementation and formulation of these offenses in the new Penal Code also need help. Consequently, this offense cannot fulfill its objection to protecting national security interests; on the contrary, it becomes a threat to freedom of speech in the public sphere.

Keywords: Anti-Pancasila, national security, freedom of speech

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

• Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Laporan Akhir Kelompok Kerja Analisa dan Evaluasi Hukum Terkait Penguatan Ideology Pancasila, quoted from site https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/laporan_akhir_pip.pdf accessed 18 January 2024

  Citrawan, Harison, and Ganesh Cintika Putri. “Law, Memory , and Silence : The Case Of Anti-Communism Laws in Indonesia.” The Age of Human Rights Journal 22, no. January (2024): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v22.8021

  Duff, RA, and SE Marshall. “'Remote Harms’ and the Two Harm Principles.” In Liberal Criminal Theory: Essays for Andreas von Hirsch, edited by A P Simester, A du Bois-Pedain, and U Neumann, 205–23. Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2014.

  Eddyono, Supriyadi Widodo. Problem Kejahatan Terhadap Ideologi Negara Dalam R KUHP, quoted from site https://reformasikuhp.org/problem-kejahatan-terhadap-ideologi-negara-dalam-r-kuhp/ accessed 18 January 2024.

  Feinberg, Joel. Freedom and Fulfillment: Philosophical Essays. New Jersey: Princeton Univeristy Press, 2021.

  Fogg, Kevin W. “Indonesian Socialism of the 1950s: From Ideology to Rhetoric.” Third World Quarterly 42, no. 3 (2020): 465–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2020.1794805

  Ghanayim, Khalid, and Mordechai Kremnitzer. “Offences against the Democratic System of Government,” quote from https://ouclf.law.ox.ac.uk/offences-against-the-democratic-system-of-government/#:~:text=Offences against the democratic regime,to establish or change the; access on accessed 18 January 2024.

  Hardiago, David. “Delik Politik Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50, no. 4 (2021): 908-925. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no4.2859

  Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: MNC Publishing, 2022.

  Justice Criminal Justice Reform, Kebebasan Berkumpul, Berekspresi, Berpendapat, dan Hak Informasi Masih dalam Ancaman quoted from site https://icjr.or.id/kebebasan-berkumpul-berekspresi-berpendapat-dan-hak-informasi-masih-dalam-ancaman/ accessed 18 January 2024.

  Kristiawanto. Memahami Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2022.

  Nella Sumika Puteri. “Memikirkan Kembali Unsur ‘ Hukum Yang Hidup Dalam Masyarakat’ Dalam Pasal 2 Rkuhp Ditinjau Perspektif Asas Legalitas.” Indonsia Criminal Law Reviw 1, no. 1 (2021): 60–72. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/iclr/vol1/iss1/5

  Neuman, William Lawrence. Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Seventh Ed. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited, 2020.

  Parahita, Gilang Desti, and Vissia Ita Yulianto. “The Treachery on YouTube: The Politics of Memory on New Media in Indonesia.” Archipel, no. 99 (2020): 47–73. https://doi.org/10.4000/archipel.1677

  Peršak, Nina. “Using ‘Quality Of Life’ To Legitimate Criminal Law Intervention: Gauging Gravity, Defining Disorder.” In Liberal Criminal Theory: Essays for Andreas von Hirsch, edited by A P Simester, A du Bois-Pedain, and U Neumann, 225–45. Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2014.

  Purba, Andreas, and Firman Wijaya. “Analisis Putusan Nomor 559/Pid.B/2017/Pn.Byw. Pengadilan Negeri Banyuwangi Tentang Penyebaran Ajaran Komunisme/Marxisme-Leninisme Secara Melawan Hukum Berdasarkan Pasal 107a Kuhp.” Jurnal Hukum Adigama 2, no. 2 (2019): 1108–29. https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v2i2.6907

  Ridlo, Muhamad. Duh Berani-beraninya Wanita Muda ini Pakai Kaos Berlambang Palu Arit, quoted from site https://www.liputan6.com/regional/read/5423745/duh-berani-beraninya-wanita-muda-ini-pakai-kaos-bergambar-palu-arit accessed 18 January 2024;

  Ronald J. Krotoszynski Jr. “The Clear and Present Dangers of the Clear and Present Danger Test: Schenck and Abrams Revisited.” SMU L. Rev. 72, no. 3 (2019): 415-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2274430

  Singleton, R, and B C Straits. Approaches to Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

  Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 2007.

  Steffensmeier, Darrell, and Noah Painter-Davis. “Focal Concerns Theory as Conceptual Tool for Studying Intersectionality in Sentencing Disparities: Focus on Gender and Race Along With Age.” In Handbook on Punishment Decisions Locations of Disparity, edited by Jeffery T. Ulmer and Mindy S. Bradley, 189–210. New York: Routledge, 2018.

  Stone, Adrienne, and Frederick Schauer, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.

  Subhan, M. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Penganut Ideologi Komunisme/Marxisme-Leninisme Di Indonesia.” Mimbar Keadilan 12, no. 2 (2019): 138–54.

  Suryani, Winda Chairunisyah. Penangkapan Pengguna Kaos Palu Arit dan Hoaks yang Dipelihara, quoted from site https://asumsi.co/post/56843/penangkapan-pengguna-kaos-palu-arit-dan-hoaks-yang-dipelihara/ accessed 18 January 2024.

  Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina. Penelitian Hukum: Legal Research. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2022.

  Tawas, Fonny, and Hironimus Taroreh. “Tindak Pidana Terhadap Keamanan Negara Berdasarkan Pasal 107a – 107f Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Lex Crimen IX, no. 4 (2020): 225–33.

  Topo Santoso. Principles of Indonesian Criminal Law (Studies in International and Comparative Criminal Law). Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. 1st ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2023.

  Yudisial Komisi. Disparitas Putusan Hakim. Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial dan JPIP, 2014.

How to Cite This

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Copyright and Permissions

Authors who publish with Kosmik Hukum agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Data Availability