Abstract
This article explores the conflict between the principle of double jeopardy and the fair trial right, with a focus on Indonesia’s legal system. The fair trial principle, a cornerstone of international human rights law, guarantees individuals the right to a just and impartial legal process. However, Indonesia's Law No. 7/2017 and Government Regulations No. 11/2017 introduce provisions that seem to undermine this principle, particularly through the application of double jeopardy. This research employs normative or doctrinal legal methods, using a literature review to examine relevant theories, principles, and legal norms. The study concludes in three key findings: First, the fair trial principle, which includes elements like the ne bis in idem and una via principles, is a binding component of international human rights law that must be adhered to by state parties, including Indonesia. Second, the provisions on double jeopardy in Indonesian law, particularly within Law No. 7/2017 and Government Regulations No. 11/2017, violate human rights by compromising human dignity and not providing true justice. Third, to ensure the protection of the fair trial principle, Indonesia should abolish the double jeopardy provisions in these laws, adopting a “one punishment for one act” approach, where further penalties should serve as guidance rather than retribution. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on the intersection of human rights, legal reform, and justice in Indonesia, advocating for necessary legal changes to better protect individuals' rights in the criminal justice system.
There is no Figure or data content available for this article
References
Adcock, Robert and David Collier, “Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research”, The American Political Science Review 95, no. 3 (2001): 529–46, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3118231.
Akhtar, Zia, “Double Jeopardy, Autrefois Acquit and the Legal Ethics of the Rule Against Unreasonably Splitting a Case”, Criminal Justice Ethics 43 no. 1 (2024): 103–21, doi:10.1080/0731129X.2024.2325795.
Atkinson, Joshua D., “Qualitative Methods.” In Journey into Social Activism: Qualitative Approaches, 65–98, (Fordham University Press, 2017).
Ayala, Carlos J., “Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 5”, Poetry 217, no. 3 (2020): 282, https://www.jstor.org/stable/27202814.
Bignami, Francesca and Carla Spivack, “Social and Economic Rights as Fundamental Rights”, The American Journal of Comparative Law 62 (2014): 561–87, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26425410.
Bilgrami, A., “Economic Rights, The Very Idea”, The Indian Economic Journal 71, no. 1, (2023): 30-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662221145279.
Boot, Martijn, “The Aim of a Theory of Justice”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15, no. 1 (2012): 7–21, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41474503.
Boulos, Sonia and MariaCaterina La Barbera, “Obstacles to and Opportunities for Protecting Human Rights at the City Level: The Case of Madrid City Council Human Rights Plan (2017–2019)”, The International Journal of Human Rights 27, no. 4 (2022): 659–84, doi:10.1080/13642987.2022.2142213.
Brems, Eva, “Conflicting Human Rights: An Exploration in the Context of the Right to a Fair Trial in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms”, Human Rights Quarterly 27, no. 1 (2005): 294–326, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20069786.
Brilmayer, Lela and Charles Seidell, “Jurisdictional Realism: Where Modern Theories of Choice of Law Went Wrong, and What Can be Done to Fix Them”, The University of Chicago Law Review 86, no. 8 (December, 2019): 2031-2100, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26808968.
Broberg, Morten and Hans-Otto Sano, “Strengths and Weaknesses in a Human Rights-Based Approach to International Development – an Analysis of a Rights-Based Approach to Development Assistance Based on Practical Experiences”, The International Journal of Human Rights 22, no. 5, (2017): 664–80, doi:10.1080/13642987.2017.1408591.
Brown-Blake, Celia, “Fair Trial, Language and the Right to Interpretation”, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 13, no. 4 (2006): 391–412, http://www.jstor.org/stable/24675356.
Burgi, Martin, “Public Administration and Law”, In “European Perspectives for Public Administration: The Way Forward”, edited by Geert Bouckaert and Werner Jann, 147–62. (Leuven University Press, 2020).
Caeiro, Pedro, “Jurisdiction in Criminal Matters in the EU: Negative and Positive Conflicts, and Beyond”, Kritische Vierteljahresschrift Für Gesetzgebung Und Rechtswissenschaft (KritV) 93, no. 4 (2010): 366–79, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43203168.
Coffey, G., “An interpretative analysis of the European ne bis in idem principle through the lens of ECHR, CFR and CISA provisions: Are three streams flowing in the same channel?”, New Journal of European Criminal Law 14, no. 3, (2023): 345-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844231160246.
Cohler, Anne M., “Legislation”, In Montesquieu’s Comparative Politics and the Spirit of American Constitutionalism, 120–47, (University Press of Kansas, 2021).
Ellis, Mark, “The Right to Fair Trials Under International Law”, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 111 (2017): 79–88, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2668018.
Gerhards, Jürgen, Lukas Antoine, and Rasmus Ollroge, “State Sovereignty and the Protection of Human Rights. How Military Humanitarian Intervention Is Supported by Citizens Around the World”, International Journal of Sociology 54, no. 3 (2024): 155–76, doi:10.1080/00207659.2024.2342642.
Government Regulations Number 11 of 2017 on Civil Servant Management, September 8, 2024, https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/5831/pp-no-11-tahun-2017.
Harris, David, “The Right to a Fair Trial in Criminal Proceedings as a Human Right”, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 16, no. 2 (1967): 352–378, http://www.jstor.org/stable/757381.
Indonesian Constitution 1945 (UUD NRI 1945), September 4, 2024, https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/101646/uud-no--.
Irman Gusman Elected as Local Representative Council of The Republic in Indonesia 2024-2029, September 8, 2024, https://s.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/putusan_mkri_10763_1718021592.pdf.
Jain, S.N., “Doctrinal and Non-Doctrinal Legal Research”, Journal of the Indian Law Institute 17, no. 4 (1975): 516–36, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43953840.
Jordaan, Louise, “Appeal by the Prosecution and the Right of the Accused to Be Protected against Double Jeopardy: A Comparative Perspective”. The Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 32, no. 1 (1999): 1–27, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23251065.
Kadir, M. Yakub Aiyub, "Revisiting Self-Determination Conflicts In Indonesia: An International Law Perspective", Indonesia Law Review 5, no. 2, (2015): 123-139,
DOI: 10.15742/ilrev.v5n2.116.Kempen, P. H. van, & J. Bemelmans, “EU protection of the substantive criminal law principles of guilt and ne bis in idem under the Charter of Fundamental Rights: Underdevelopment and overdevelopment in an incomplete criminal justice framework”, New Journal of European Criminal Law 9, no. 2 (2018): 247-264, https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284418778146.
Law Number 39 of 1999 on Human Rights, September 6, 2024, https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/45361/uu-no-39-tahun-1999.
Law Number 12 of 2005 on The Ratification of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, September 6, 2024, https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/40261/uu-no-12-tahun-2005.
Law Number 11 of 2005 on The Ratification of International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, September 7, 2024, https://www.komnasham.go.id/files/1475231620-uu-no-11-tahun-2005-tentang-pengesahan-$PXTXO.pdf.
Law Number 28 of 2007 on Third Amendment to Law Number 6 of 1983 on General Provisions and Taxations Procedures, September 8, 2024, https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/39916/uu-no-28-tahun-2007.
Law Number 6 of 2023 on the Establishment of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Making Become Law, September 8, 2024, https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/246523/uu-no-6-tahun-2023.
Law Number 7 of 2017 on General Elections, September 8, 2024, https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/37644/uu-no-7-tahun-2017.
Leiter, Brian, “Legal Realism and Legal Positivism Reconsidered”, Ethics 111, no. 2 (2001): 278–301, https://doi.org/10.1086/233474.
Mensah, Ebenezer Kojo Gyesi, Ghanaian Criminal Jurisprudence: the Rule of Double Jeopardy (April 6, 2024), Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4786645.
Meyer, Andrea Giampetro- and Nancy Kubasek, “Harvey: Environmental Justice and Law”, Fordham Environmental Law Review 31, no. 1 (2020): 37–59, https://www.jstor.org/stable/26954624.
Morosin, Michele N., "Double Jeopardy and International Law: Obstacles to Formulating a General Principle", Nordic Journal of International Law 64, no. 2 (1995): 261-274, https://doi.org/10.1163/157181095X00553.
Naibaho, Nathalina, et al, "Criministrative Law: Developments and Challenges in Indonesia." Indonesia Law Review 11, no. 1, (2021): 1-14, doi:10.15742/ilrev.v11n1.647.
Parzych, A. Błachnio-, “Solutions to the accumulation of different penal responsibilities for the same act and their assessment from the perspective of the ne bis in idem principle”, New Journal of European Criminal Law 9, no. 3, (2018): 366-385, https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284418798054.
Peci, Idlir, “Sounds of Silence: A Research Into the Relationship Between Administrative Supervision, Criminal Investigation and the Nemo-Tenetur Principle.” PhD diss., Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, (2006).
Plattner, Marc F., “Internationalism and Democracy”, Philosophy 80, no. 314 (2005): 495–511, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4619676.
Reno, William, “Fictional States & Atomized Public Spheres: A Non-Western Approach to Fragility”, Daedalus 146, no. 4 (2017): 139–51, https://www.jstor.org/stable/48563909.
Rogier, Lodewijk, Penal Sanctions, Administrative Sanctions and the 'Una Via' Principle (June 18, 1992). Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1895462.
Safitri, Siti Shalima, 2024, “Interrelasi Denda Administratif Dan Pidana Dalam Pelanggaran Hukum Lingkungan Hidup Pasca Perppu Cipta Kerja”, Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia 9 (2):279-304, https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v9i2.590.
Schuppert, Gunnar Folke and Rhodes Barrett, “The Institutionalization Functions of Law: The Language of Law as the Language of Order and Conflict Resolution”, In A Global History of Ideas in the Language of Law, 16:95–102, (Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory, 2021).
Schuppert, Gunnar Folke and Rhodes Barrett, “Constitution”, In A Global History of Ideas in the Language of Law, 16:246–57, (Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory, 2021).
Stumpf, Klara Helene, Christian U. Becker, and Stefan Baumgärtner, “A Conceptual Structure of Justice - Providing a Tool to Analyse Conceptions of Justice”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19, no. 5 (2016): 1187–1202, http://www.jstor.org/stable/44955465.
Suherman, Edi, “Kewenangan Pejabat Pembina Kepegawaian dalam Pengisian Jabatan Pimpinan Tinggi Pratama di Daerah Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara”, Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 5, no. 2, (2017): 220-232, https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v5i2.467.
Syaefudin, Muhammad, “Kewenangan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) Dalam Menegakan Kode Etik Pelanggaran Pemilihan Umum”, USM Law Review 2, no. 1, (2018): 104-120, http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v2i1.2261.
The Competence of District Court, September 8, 2024, https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38793/uu-no-48-tahun-2009.
“Una Via Prosecution of Tax and Increased Criminal Fines,” Laga.be, March 9, 2015, http:// laga.be/newsroom/legal-news/una-via-prosecution-of-tax-and-increased-criminal–fines.
Weissbrodt, David and Mattias Hallendorff, “Travaux Préparatoires of the Fair Trial Provisions--Articles 8 to 11--Of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights”, Human Rights Quarterly 21, no. 4 (1999): 1061–96, http://www.jstor.org/stable/762756.
How to Cite This
Article Metrics
Download Statistics
Other Statistics
Copyright and Permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Kosmik Hukum agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Data Availability
template
sertifikat
