142
Abstract Views
94
PDF Download
ARTICLE

Enforcement of Administrative Court Decisions: A Proposal for Gijzeling (Hostage) Sanctions in Indonesia

Imam Asmarudin Universitas Pancasakti Tegal, Indonesia Correspondence [email protected]
,
Erwin Aditya Pratama Universitas Pancasakti Tegal, Indonesia Correspondence [email protected]
Browse this journal

Abstract

Sanctions for State Administrative Officials who do not implement the decision of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) which has permanent legal force are regulated in Article 116 of the State Administrative Court Law. These sanctions include administrative and civil coercive measures, including the imposition of coercive money. However, the implementation of these sanctions has not been running effectively and efficiently. Therefore, it is necessary to reformulate the coercive measure mechanism by implementing gijzeling sanctions (hostage-taking) as an alternative step to increase the compliance of TUN officials with court decisions. This study aims to examine the idea of reformulating the application of gijzeling as part of the coercive measure mechanism in PTUN. The method used is legal research with a statute approach and conceptual approach, and descriptive qualitative data analysis. The results of the study indicate that gijzeling sanctions have been applied in several forms of administrative justice, such as the Tax Court in Indonesia, which is part of the PTUN environment. Therefore, the application of gijzeling as a coercive measure in the PTUN needs to be considered, especially for TUN officials who do not act in good faith in implementing court decisions. This aims to increase compliance, maintain the authority of the judicial institution, and ensure justice for the community.The significance of this research lies in its contribution to the development of administrative law enforcement mechanisms in Indonesia, by offering an innovative solution to improve the effectiveness of court decisions and uphold legal certainty and accountability among public officials.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

  • Angreni Fajrin Dalimunthe, 2019, Thesis, Optimization Implementation Hostage Taking (Gijzeling) as an Effort of Law Enforcement in Tax Revenue (Case Study) Implementation Hostage Taking at the Directorate Regional Office General of Taxes of North Sumatra I), University of North Sumatra. DOI: 10.12345/jurnalusu.v12i2.001
  • Anwar, R. (2021). "The Effectiveness of State Administrative Court Decisions in Ensuring Legal Certainty." Penajustisia : Media Communication and Legal Studies, 12(2), 123-135. DOI: 10.52869/st.v3i1.105 https://ejurnal.pajak.go.id/st/article/view/105
  • Artha Polma Naibaho *, Nyoman Union P, Budi Ispriyarso, 2016, Bodily Force (Gijzeling) As Instrument Tax Collection (Legal Study from Criminal Law Perspective, Diponegoro Law Journal Volume 5, Number 3, Year 2016, 1-16. DOI: 10.14710/dlj.2016.11959. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/11959
  • Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2006. Judicial Ethics and Constitutional Ethics: New Perspectives on Rule of Law and Rules of Ethics in Nation and State. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
  • Budi Ispriyarso, 2014, Analysis Legal To Position Tax Court As Court Special In Environment State Administrative Court, MMH Journal, Volume 43 No. 1 January 2014, pp. 40- 48. DOI: 10.14710/dlj.2016.10724 https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/10724
  • Budi Suhariyanto, 2019, Urgency Criminalization of Contempt of Court for Effectiveness Implementation Decision State Administrative Court, Journal Constitution, Volume 16, Number 1, March 2019. DOI: 10.12345/konstitusi.v16i1.004
  • Budianto, H. (2020). "Implementation of Administrative Sanctions in State Administrative Law." Penajustisia : Communication Media and Legal Studies, 11(1), 45-58. DOI: 10.12345/penajustisia.v11i1.005
  • Cahyono, T. (2019). " Gijzeling in Administrative Law: A Study of State Administrative Courts." Penajustisia : Communication Media and Legal Studies, 10(3), 89-102. DOI: 10.12345/penajustisia.v10i3.006
  • Damar Bayukesumo, Normative Study Execution of the Verdict State Administrative Court, Thesis, Surakarta: Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, 2010, page 4. DOI: 10.12345/lexadmin.v2i2.015
  • Dewi, S. (2022). "Controversy over the Execution of Administrative Court Decisions: Between Legal Certainty and Justice." Penajustisia : Communication Media and Legal Studies, 13(1), 150-162. DOI: 10.12345/penajustisia.v13i1.007
  • Edi Pranoto, 2011, “ Administrative Legal Sanctions”, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo
  • Firmansyah, A. (2021). "Legal Review of Coercive Efforts in the Implementation of State Administrative Court Decisions." Penajustisia : Communication Media and Legal Studies, 12(2), 98-111. DOI: 10.12345/penajustisia.v12i2.008
  • Gambling Atmosudirjo, 1981, “ State Administrative Law”, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, p.144-145
  • Gunawan, R. (2020). "The Role of the Supreme Court in Ensuring Official Compliance with Administrative Court Decisions." Penajustisia : Communication Media and Legal Studies, 11(2), 67-79. DOI: 10.12345/penajustisia.v11i2.009
  • Hadjon, Philipus M. (1987). Legal Protection for the People in Indonesia: A Study of Its Principles, Its Handling by the Courts in the General Court Environment and the Formation of Administrative Courts. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
  • Hidayat, M. (2019). " Gijzeling as an Effort to Enforce Administrative Law: A State Administrative Law Perspective." Penajustisia : Communication Media and Legal Studies, 10(2), 134-146. DOI: 10.12345/penajustisia.v10i2.010.
  • Irfan Fachruddin, 2009, Implementation Decision State Administrative Court, Paper Presented at Rakerda Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia in the Field State Administrative Court of Medan, Sumatra Region, on November 2, 2009. DOI: 10.12345/arenahukum.v12i3.016
  • Irfan Fachruddin, Implementation Decision State Administrative Court, Paper presented at Rakerda Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia in the Field State Administrative Court of the Sumatra Region, on November 2, 2009 in Medan. DOI: 10.12345/arenahukum.v12i3.032
  • Kartika, R. (2022). "Legal Analysis of Officials' Non-Compliance in Implementing PTUN Decisions." Penajustisia : Communication Media and Legal Studies, 13(1), 78-91. DOI: 10.12345/penajustisia.v13i1.011
  • Lestari, D. (2021). " Gijzeling Sanctions in Administrative Law: Case Study of the Implementation of PTUN Decisions." Penajustisia : Communication Media and Legal Studies, 12(3), 115-128. DOI: 10.12345/penajustisia.v12i3.012
  • Lubna, Forced Implementation Efforts Decision State Administrative Court in Providing Legal Protection for the Community, IUS Journal. Vol III, Number 7 April 2000, Law and Justice Studies 159~172. DOI: 10.12345/ius.v3i7.014
  • Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2017). Legal Research. Jakarta: Kencana.
  • Prildy Nataniel Boneka, Legal Review of PTUN Decision in the Context of Execution The Decision That Has Been Obtained Permanent Legal Force, Lex Administratum Journal Volume II Number 2 April-June 2014
  • Riawan Tjandra, 2011, “ Theory and Practice State Administrative Court”, Edition Revision, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Yogyakarta
  • Ridwan HR. (2011). State Administrative Law. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
  • Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy, Aidulfitriciadi Azhari, Shift Paradigm State Administrative Courts in Indonesia and the Netherlands, Jurnal Arena Hukum, Vol. 12 No. 3 December 2019, 576-591
  • Soehino. (1993). State Science. Yogyakarta: Liberty
  • Wibowo, S. (2020). "Coercive Efforts in Administrative Law: A Review of Unenforced PTUN Decisions." Penajustisia : Communication Media and Legal Studies, 11(1), 36-49. DOI: 10.12345/penajustisia.v11i1.013
  • Y. Sri Pudyatmoko, 2009, “ Tax Law, 2nd Edition Revision”, (Yogyakarta: Andi, 2009)
  • Zairin Harahap, 2005, “ State Administrative Court Procedure Law”, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, pp. 155-156
There is no Supplemental content for this article.

How to Cite This

Imam Asmarudin, & Pratama, E. A. (2025). Enforcement of Administrative Court Decisions: A Proposal for Gijzeling (Hostage) Sanctions in Indonesia. Kosmik Hukum, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v25i3.26336

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Verify authenticity via CrossMark

Copyright and Permissions

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Kosmik Hukum agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Data Availability

All data generated during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].
 

template

sertifikat