21
Abstract Views
8
PDF Download
ARTICLE

The Language Strategy of Power in the Separation of Case Files through the Concept of the Truth Game

Rocky Marbun Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia Correspondence [email protected]
,
Erli Sandiana Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia Correspondence [email protected]
,
Dellia Rahma Sari Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia Correspondence [email protected]
Pages 342-356
Browse this journal

Abstract

The Criminal Procedure Code provides juridical rights based on the principle of functional differentiation, to the Public Prosecution Service of the Republic of Indonesia to make internal rules that will be implemented by the Public Prosecutor in the trial process of criminal cases. One of the authorities that is technically regulated by the Public Prosecutor's Office is the splitting of case files that contain elements of participation. This legal action is used to obtain witness testimony by confronting the Defendants. This article aims to show the violation of procedural law committed by the Public Prosecutor through its artificial authority in prosecuting criminal cases. The method used is a legal research method with a Trichotomy Relation Approach, namely the concept of Truth-Games based on secondary data. The result is that the Public Prosecutor utilizes internal rules as true knowledge in the form of written language and an Indictment to separate case files. The purpose of this legal action, was so that each defendant provide incriminating testimony against the other, under the shadows of criminal threats if they gave false testimony or refused to testify. Thus, this legal action is a violation of the principle of non-self-incrimination.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

  • Adi Riyanto, Tiar. “Fungsionalisasi Prinsip Dominus Litis Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 6, no. 3 (2021): 481–92. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol6.iss3.art4.
  • Adlin, Alfathri. “Michel Foucault: Kuasa/Pengetahuan, (Rezim) Kebenaran, Parrhesia.” JAQFI: Jurnal Aqidah Dan Filsafat Islam 1, no. 1 (2016): 13–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15575/jaqfi.v1i1.1694.
  • Dewi, Novia Sandra. “Teori Motivasi.” In Pengantar Manajemen (Teori Dan Konsep), edited by Hartini. Bandung: Media Sains Indonesia, 2021.
  • Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge & The Discourse on Language. Edited by A.M. Sheridan Smith. New Jersey: Tavistock Publications Limited, 1972. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823677-2.00010-6.
  • Halwati, Umi. “Analisis Foucault Dalam Membedah Wacana Teks Dakwah Di Media Massa.” At-Tabsyir, Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam Volume 1, no. 1 (2013): 145–58. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/at-tabsyir.v1i1.456.
  • Harahap, M. Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP (Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2003.
  • Ibrahim, Johnny. Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Bayumedia Publishing, 2012.
  • Jazeri, M. “Menabur Bahasa, Menuai Kuasa (Memahami Relasi Bahasa Dan Kekuasaan Dalam Iklan Politik).” Jurnal Lingua Scientia 2, no. 2 (2010): 101–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2010.2.2.101-113.
  • Karman. “Bahasa Dan Kekuasaan (Instrumen Simbolik Peraih Kekuasaan Versi Bourdieu).” Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Dan Media 21, no. 2 (2017): 235–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31445/jskm.2017.210208.
  • Kebung, Konrad. “Kembalinya Moral Melalui Seks.” Majalah Basis, 2002.
  • ———. “Membaca ‘Kuasa’ Michel Foucault Dalam Konteks ‘Kekuasaan’ Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Melintas 33, no. 1 (2017): 34–51. https://doi.org/10.26593/mel.v33i1.2953.34-51.
  • KompasTV. “Hakim Wahyu Tegaskan Tidak Butuh Pengakuan Ferdy Sambo: Sangatlah Janggal Keterangan Saudara!” KompasTV, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtkTCbJBzq0&ab_channel=KOMPASTV.
  • Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 Tahun 2012 tentang Rumusan Hukum Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia (2012).
  • Manik, Khatherine Sesilia, Septian Arjuanda Putra Simatupang, Shellya Eka Putri, Tiominar Sianipar, Parlaungan Gabriel Siahaan, and Dewi Pika Lbn Batu. “Pemisahan Berkas Perkara (Splitsing) Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Perspektif Hukum Islam.” AL-SYAKHSHIYYAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 5, no. 2 (2023): 143–64. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30863/as-hki.v5i2.5438.
  • Marbun, Rocky. “Parole Sebagai Alat Komunikasi Dalam Praktik Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal USM Law Review 3, no. 1 (2020): 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v3i1.1824.
  • ———. “Permainan-Kebenaran (Truth-Games) Oleh Hakim Dalam Kegiatan Kognitif-Interpretatif Berdasarkan Pendekatan Trikotomi Relasi.” Jurnal Humani (Hukum Dan Masyarakat Madani) 13, no. 1 (2023): 182–201. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/humani.v13i1.6842.
  • ———. “Trikotomi Relasi Dalam Penetapan Tersangka : Menguji Frasa ‘Pemeriksaan Calon Tersangka’ Melalui Praperadilan.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 1 (2021): 159–90. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.4.1.159-190.
  • Marbun, Rocky, Wibisono Oedoyo, and Debby Monica Sinaga. “Logika Monolog Dalam Trikotomi Relasi Pada Proses Pra-Adjudikasi.” Jurnal USM Law Review 4, no. 1 (2021): 1–26. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i1.3308.
  • Masitoh. “Pendekatan Dalam Analisis Wacana Kritis.” Jurnal Elsa: Edukasi Lingua Sastra 18, no. 1 (2020): 66–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47637/elsa.v18i1.221.
  • Maskanah, Ummi. “Eksaminasi (Legal a Nnotation) Sebagai Pintu Masuk Proses Reformasi Lembaga Peradilan.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Litigasi 14, no. 1 (2013): 1773–1801. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v14i1.153.
  • Meldandy, Maulana. “Eksistensi Single Prosecution System (Sistem Penuntutan Tunggal) Terhadap Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Penuntutan Antara Jaksa KPK Dengan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.” Universitas Andalas, 2001.
  • Mudhoffir, Abdil Mughis. “Teori Kekuasaan Michel Foucault: Tantangan Bagi Sosiologi Politik.” MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi 18, no. 1 (2013): 75–100. https://doi.org/10.7454/mjs.v18i1.3734.
  • Mudjia Rahardjo. “Bahasa Dan Kekuasaan: Studi Wacana Politik Abdurrahman Wahid Dalam Perspektif Hermeneutika Gadamerian.” UIN Malang. Universitas Airlangga, 2005.
  • Najih, Muhammad Kholil. “Pemisahan Berkas Perkara Dalam Penyertaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2019.
  • Nur, Muhammad Azhar, and Mustamin. “Kegagalan Asas Diferensiasi Fungsional: Transformasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Berdasarkan Asas Dominus Litis Dalam RUU KUHAP.” Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 7, no. 1 (2025): 38–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47435/al-ahkam.v7i1.3673.
  • Pontier, J.A. Rechtsvinding (Penemuan Hukum). Edited by Bernad Arief Sidharta. Jakarta: Jendela Mas Pustaka, 2008.
  • Pratama, Refaldi Andika. “Kekuasaan, Pengetahuan, Dan Hegemoni Bahasa Dalam Perspektif Michael Foucault Dan Francis Bacon.” Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia 4, no. 1 (2021): 33–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v4i1.30543.
  • Putra, Nanda Perdana. “Dugaan Kesaksian Palsu ART Sambo Dan Kecurigaan Jaksa Soal Penggunaan Earphone.” liputan6.com, 2022. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/5112592/dugaan-kesaksian-palsu-art-sambo-dan-kecurigaan-jaksa-soal-penggunaan-earphone.
  • Rahardjo, Satjipto. Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Penerbit Kompas, 2010.
  • Rahim, Muhammad. “Asas-Asas Hukum Penuntutan.” The Prosecutor Law Review 1, no. 1 (2023): 1–36.
  • Sabirin, Sabirin. “Pemecahan Berkas Perkara Dan Relevansinya Dengan Asas Peradilan Cepat Dalam Perspektif Keadilan.” Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum 13, no. 2 (2021): 459. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v13i2.5067.
  • Scholten, Paul. Struktur Ilmu Hukum. Edited by Bernard Arief Sidharta. Bandung: Alumni, 2011.
  • Siregar, Mangihut. “Kritik Terhadap Teori Kekuasaan-Pengetahuan Foucault.” JURNAL ILMU SOSIAL Dan ILMU POLITIK 1, no. 1 (2021): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.30742/juispol.v1i1.1560.
  • Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakkan Hukum. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2014.
  • Sunaryo. “(Inter-) Relasi Kekuasaan Dan Kebenaran Menurut Michel Foucault.” Jurnal Dekonstruksi 9, no. 03 (2023): 31–35. https://doi.org/10.54154/dekonstruksi.v9i03.164.
  • Thomas, Linda, and Shan Wareing. Bahasa, Masyarakat & Kekuasaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2007.
  • Waskitara, Wisnu. “Pemisahan Berkas Perkara (Splitsing) Oleh Penuntut Umum Dalam Proses Pembuktian Suatu Tindak Pidana Pada Delik Penyertaan.” Journal of Law 8, no. 1 (2022): 1–14.
  • Yuhelson. Hukum Arbitrase. Yogyakarta: Arti Bumi Intaran, 2018.
  • Zulkarnain, and Rocky Marbun. “Symbolic Domination in the Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 4 of 2016 Concerning the Prohibition of Reviewing Pre-Trial Decisions.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law Reform (INCLAR 2021), 590:57–62. Atlantis Press SARL, 2021. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211102.167.
There is no Supplemental content for this article.

How to Cite This

Marbun, R., Sandiana, E., & Sari, D. R. (2026). The Language Strategy of Power in the Separation of Case Files through the Concept of the Truth Game. Kosmik Hukum, 26(2), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v26i2.26990

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Verify authenticity via CrossMark

Copyright and Permissions

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Kosmik Hukum agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Data Availability

All data generated during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].
 

template

sertifikat