134
Abstract Views
41
PDF Download
ARTICLE

Investigating Economic Crimes by Indonesia’s Attorney General’s Office: Empirical Findings and Policy Implications

, , ,
Pages 407-527

Abstract

Economic crimes in Indonesia, such as corruption, money laundering, and financial fraud, have shown significant growth and increasingly complex patterns in recent years. These dynamics demand innovative and integrated strategies from law enforcement agencies. This research examines the exercise of investigative authority by the Attorney General’s Office of Indonesia, focusing on both its implementation and practical implications. Employing normative legal research supported by empirical data, the study applies case and legislative approaches analyzed through qualitative description. Findings reveal the dual realities of economic crime investigations: notable achievements supported by institutional frameworks and legal mandates, as well as persistent challenges including procedural limitations, coordination barriers, and limited resources. The analysis further identifies factors contributing to investigative success, alongside obstacles that hinder effectiveness. Beyond mapping these realities, the study evaluates the empirical implications of investigative practices for law enforcement policies. The findings highlight the necessity of integrating empirical approaches to capture field realities and inform responsive legal strategies. As a result, the research proposes policy recommendations aimed at strengthening institutional capacity, refining investigative mechanisms, and enhancing overall law enforcement integrity. Ultimately, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of how empirical perspectives can improve the effectiveness of economic crime investigations in Indonesia.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

  • Anastasya Dowongi, “Implementasi Hukum Mengenai Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Money Launderyng) Menurut Undang-Undang No 8 Tahun 2010”, Lex Privatum, 13/5, 2024.
  • Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.
  • Bonifasius Petrus Sando Mokorimban, “Fungsi, Tugas, Dan Wewenang Kejaksaan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Menurut Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2021”, Lex Privatum, 13/4, 2024.
  • David Nelken, Comparative Criminal Justice and Globalization, London: Routledge, 2007.
  • David O. Friedrichs, Trusted Criminals: White Collar Crime in Contemporary Society, Drive Belmont CA USA: Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing, 2009.
  • David S. Wall, Cybercrime: The Transformation of Crime in the Information Age, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.
  • Devi Ariani, Lusy Liany, “Pro Kontra Proses Pembentukan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Tinjau Dari Azas-Azas Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan”, ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 12/1, 2021.
  • Dewi Asri Puanandini, Muhammad Syahid Syidiq, Jihan Pasha Noevera, “Efektivitas Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang”, Public Sphere, 2/2, 2023.
  • Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, Laporan Kinerja DJP 2021, Jakarta: Laporan DJP, 2021.
  • Eddy O.S. Hiariej, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana, Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2020.
  • Fany Dewi Rengganis, Dwi Setiawan Susanto, “Evaluasi implementasi program anti pencucian uang di Indonesia”, Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 9/2, 2023.
  • Folman P. Ambarita, “Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Terorisme”, Binamulia Hukum, 7/2, 2018.Data Indonesia, “(Laporan) Kumpulan Data Seputar Korupsi di Indonesia 20 Tahun Terakhir hingga 2024”, /https://assets.dataindonesia.id/2025/03/25/1742889395680-1-Laporan-Kumpulan-Data-Seputar-Korupsi-di-Indonesia-20-Tahun-Terakhir-hingga-2024.pdf.
  • H. Skolnick, Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society, New York: Wiley, 1994.
  • Ilham Ramadhan, Mia Puspita Sari, Nedi Aprizal, Tyo Qhoirun Nisa, Dimas Dwi Arso, “Studi Analisis Terhadap Urgensi dan Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang”, MANDUB: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora, 2/3, 2024.
  • Irma Yurita, M. Kevin Ramadhan, M. Candra, “Pengaruh Kemajuan Teknologi Terhadap Perkembangan Tindak Pidana Cybercrime (Studi Kasus Phising Sebagai Ancaman Keamanan Digital)”, Jurnal Hukum Legalita, 5/2, 2023, p. 143.
  • Jimly Asshiddiqie, Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, 2006.
  • John H. Langbein, The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
  • Kenneth Culp Davis, Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry, Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1969.
  • Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, Laporan Tahunan KPK 2022, Jakarta: Laporan KPK, 2022.
  • Lawrence M. Friedman, Crime and Punishment in American History, New York: Basic Books, 1993.
  • M. Ridho Fadli, Budi Bahreisy, Nasrianti, “Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pendanaan Terorisme Melalui Instrumen Anti Money Laundering”, Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum (JIM FH), 2/2, 2022.
  • Mark Pieth (Ed), Corporate Criminal Liability: Emergence, Convergence, and Risk, Dordrecht: Springer, 2016.
  • Mark Pieth (Ed), Gold Laundering: The Dirty Secrets of the Gold Trade, Zurich: Dike Publishers, 2019.
  • Michael Levi, The Phantom Capitalists: The Organization and Control of Long-Firm Fraud, London: Routledge, 2008.
  • Michael Levi, Regulating Fraud: White-Collar Crime and The Criminal Process, London: Routledge, 2014.
  • Monica Violeta Achim dan Sorin Nicolae Borlea, Economic and Financial Crime: Corruption, Shadow Economy, and Money Laundering, Cham: Springer, 2020.
  • Nelken, White-Collar Crime (The International Library of Criminology and Criminal Justice and Penology), London: Routledge, 2002.
  • Nia Gabriella Kaihena, “Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Kejaksaan Dalam Sistem Ketenaga Kerjaan Diindonesia”, Lex Privatum, 11/1, 2023.
  • Novia Azmi, “Pengaruh Globalisasi Terhadap Peredaran Narkotika Di Asia Tenggara Tahun 2011-2015”, JOM FISIP, 4/1, 2017.
  • Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, Laporan Tahunan OJK 2021, Jakarta: Laporan OJK, 2021, p. 45.
  • Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, Laporan Tahunan OJK 2021, Jakarta: Laporan OJK, 2021.
  • Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan, Laporan Tahunan PPATK 2022, Jakarta: Laporan PPATK, 2022.
  • Randy Andario, “Peranan Ppatk (Pusat Pelaporan Dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan) Dalam Mencegah Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang”, Lex Administratum, 4/4, 2016.
  • Reza Prihandana, Tri Satrio Wahyu Murthi, Jhonson Efendi Tambunan, Irwan Syafari, “Wewenang Jaksa di Bidang Keperdataan Berdasarkan Pasal 30 Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia”, Halu Oleo Law Review, 7/1, 2023.
  • Richard A. Posner, How Judges Think, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008.
  • Rider (Ed), A Research Agenda for Economic Crime and Development, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021.
  • Sahuri Lasmadi, “Tumpang Tindih Kewenangan Penyidikan Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana”, Inovatif: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2/3, 2020.
  • Susan Rose-Ackerman, Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • Tri Ginanjar Laksana, Sri Mulyani, “Faktor – Faktor Mendasar Kejahatan Siber Terhadap Kemanusiaan”, Jurnal Hukum Prioris, 11/2, 2023.
  • UNODC, Comprehensive Study on Cybercrime, Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2013.
  • William T. Pizzi, Trials Without Truth: Why Our System of Criminal Trials Has Become an Expensive Failure and What We Need to Do to Rebuild It, New York: NYU Press, 1999.
  • Yasmina Fayzaa , Muhamad Amirullohb, Mustofa Haffas, “Penjualan Sertifikat Vaksin Covid-19 Oleh Pengguna Facebook Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Terkait”, Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 4/1, 2022.
There is no Supplemental content for this article.

How to Cite This

Febriansyah, A., Hardiansyah, Banjarani, D., & Novianti, V. (2025). Investigating Economic Crimes by Indonesia’s Attorney General’s Office: Empirical Findings and Policy Implications. Kosmik Hukum, 25(3), 407–527. https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v25i3.27417

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Verify authenticity via CrossMark

Copyright and Permissions

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Kosmik Hukum agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Data Availability

 

template

sertifikat