Abstract

The essence of restorative justice lies in achieving a balanced fulfillment of criminal law objectives, which extend beyond mere legal certainty to encompass justice and societal benefit. Within this framework, judicial pardon defined as the judge’s authoritative discretion to grant forgiveness to an offender serves as a corrective response to the rigidity of the legality principle in the criminal justice system. This study employs a non-doctrinal paradigm with a descriptive approach to analyze the role of judicial pardon as a form of corrective sentencing in Indonesia’s criminal justice system. The findings indicate that a judicial pardon allows judges to render a verdict without imposing punishment when an offender is found guilty but, in the judge’s view, does not warrant penal sanction. Such verdicts differ fundamentally from acquittals, releases, or convictions, thereby establishing judicial pardon as a unique category of judgment. However, despite its recognition in the National Criminal Code, the absence of technical provisions in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code (RKUHAP) limits its practical application. Therefore, judicial pardon should be regulated not only within substantive criminal law but also in procedural criminal law, ensuring its operative function in delivering both moral and legal justice through restorative mechanisms. By conceptualizing judicial pardon as corrective justice, this research not only highlights its normative and procedural challenges but also offers insights for strengthening the balance between moral justice and legal justice in Indonesia’s evolving criminal law system.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

• Adery Ardhan Saputro, Konsepsi Rechterlijk Pardon Atau Pemaafan Hakim Dalam Rancangan KUHP, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Hlm.66 https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/view/15867, https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15867, diakses pada Jumat, 14 Februari 2025, pkl.22.30 WIB.
• Braithwaite, John. "Principles of restorative justice." Restorative justice and criminal justice: Competing or reconcilable paradigms 360 (2003): 1-20.
• Bunga Kharisma Octafiana, Frans Simangunsong, Urgensi Penambahan Putusan Permaafan Hakim (Rechterlijk Pardon) Dalam Pasal 191 KUHAP, Jurnal Kajian Hukum Iuris Studia, Vol 5, No 3 (2024)
• Corsei, Andreea. "The Principle of Legality in Criminal Proceedings." Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica 21.1 (2025): 21-26.
• Eva Achjani Zulfa, Keadilan Restoratif, (Depok: Badan Penerbit FHUI, 2009)
• Fadjar Sukma dan Chitto Cumbhadrika, “Urgensi Penerapan Rechterlijk Pardon Sebagai Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Restoratif” Gorontalo Law Review 6, No. 1, (April 2023).
• Farikhah, Mufatikhatul. "The Judicial Pardon Arrangement as a Method of Court Decision in the Reform of Indonesian Criminal Law Procedure." PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 8.1 (2021): 1-25.
• Hirsch, Andreas von. "Deserved criminal sentences." (2017): 1-128.
• https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/memahami-rechterlijk-pardon-atau-konsep-pemaafan-hakim-lt6438c43d2efab/?page=2 access on 15 Feb 2025
• M.Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP, (Jakarta:Sinar Grafika,2006),
• Mardjono Reksodiputro, Kriminologi dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Kumpulan karangan Buku Kedua, Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan dan Pengabdian Hukum, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, 1994
• Moeljatno. 1987. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. PT, BINA ASKARA: Jakarta
• Mufatikhatul Farikhah, Rekonseptualisasi Dispensa de pena Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia (Studi Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Indonesia dengan Sistem Hukum Barat) Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Volume 48 Number 3, 2018, Universitas Indonesia
• Muladi, Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana, (Semarang : B. P. Universitas Diponegoro, 1995)
• Nefa Claudia Melia, Rechterlijk Pardon (Pemaafan Hakim) : Suatu Upaya Menuju Sistem Peradilan Pidana Paradigma Keadilan Restoratif, Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Volume 8 Issue. 3, December 2020, http://jurnalius.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jurnalIUS
• Paneyakh, Ella. "The practical logic of judicial decision making: Discretion under pressure and compromises at the expense of the defendant." Russian Politics & Law 54.2-3 (2016): 138-163.
• Quinney, Richard, and Randall G. Shelden. Critique of the legal order: Crime control in capitalist society. Routledge, 2018.
• Romli Atmasasmita, Rekonstruksi Asas Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan (Geen Straf Zonder Schuld), Cetakan Kedua, (Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2018)
• Suryawan, Ridwan. "Asas Rechtelijk Pardon (Judicial Pardon) dalam Perkembangan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia." Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) 2.3 (2021): 170-177.
• Yesmil Anwar, Kriminologi, (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2003)

How to Cite This

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Copyright and Permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Kosmik Hukum agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Data Availability