Abstract

This article examines the effectiveness of intellectual property rights law enforcement in Indonesia by analysing three main elements of the legal system: legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture. The study focuses on the enforcement of intellectual property rights through civil mechanisms, criminal proceedings, and alternative dispute resolution. The analysis shows that the effectiveness of intellectual property enforcement is influenced not only by the adequacy of legal norms, but also by the capacity and coordination of law enforcement institutions, procedural efficiency, and public legal awareness. In civil disputes, parties are encouraged to strengthen contractual clauses that refer disputes to alternative dispute resolution or arbitration mechanisms, as these forums may provide faster, more confidential, cost-efficient, and legally certain outcomes. Meanwhile, in criminal enforcement, challenges remain in the technical capacity of law enforcement officials, inter-institutional coordination, and bureaucratic complexity. Therefore, improving intellectual property law enforcement in Indonesia requires strengthening the competence of law enforcement officers, simplifying enforcement procedures, enhancing institutional collaboration, and increasing public awareness of intellectual property protection. These measures are essential to create a more professional, efficient, and practical enforcement system that supports legal certainty and the protection of innovation.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

• Abbas, Ririn Yulandari, Ika Novitasari Munira, and Riskayanti. “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Era Digital: Upaya Perlindungan Merek dalam Ekosistem E-Commerce Indonesia.” Semarang Law Review (SLR) 6 (2025): 350–366. https://doi.org/10.26623/slr.v6i2.12621.
• Calboli, Irene. “Trademark Exhaustion in the European Union: Community-Wide or International? The Saga Continues.” Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 6, no. 1 (2002).
• Dinwoodie, Graeme B. “The International Intellectual Property Law System: New Actors, New Institutions, New Sources.” Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 10, no. 2 (2006).
• Geiger, Christophe. “The Social Function of Intellectual Property Rights, or How Ethics Can Influence the Shape and Use of IP Law.” Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law Research Paper (2013). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783470532.00013.
• Gervais, Daniel J. “The TRIPS Agreement and the Doha Round: History and Impact on Economic Development.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 36, no. 2 (2003).
• Gommers, Carina, Willem Leppink, and Marius Schneider. “Round-up of European Enforcement Case Law 2021.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 17, no. 6 (2022): 478–486.
• Gumilang, Natassja Putri, and Fennieka Kristianto. “Legal Protection of Copyright Towards Work Piracy for ‘Paid Stories’ Written Works on Wattpad Platform: A Case Study in Indonesia.” European Journal of Law and Political Science 4 (2025): 15–21. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejpolitics.2025.4.2.168.
• Haunss, Sebastian. “Enforcement versus Access: Wrestling with Intellectual Property on the Internet.” Internet Policy Review 2, no. 1 (2013): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.14763/2013.2.132.
• Hulman Panjaitan, Andrew Betlehn, Tomson Situmeang, Md Zubair Kasem Khan, and Mahadi Hasan Miraz. “Music Copyright Protection in the Digital Era: Legal Framework and Strategies for Enforcement.” Jurnal Hukum (2024). https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v40i2.40525.
• Irhamdessetya, Hani, and Daniel Manongga. “The Effectiveness of Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014 in the Prevention of Copyright Infringement.” The Virtual International Conference on Economics, Law and Humanities 1 (2023): 167–173. https://callforpaper.unw.ac.id/index.php/ICOELH/article/view/288.
• Kurniawaty, Yuniar. “Efektivitas Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Sengketa Kekayaan Intelektual.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 14, no. 2 (2017): 163–170. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v14i2.98.
• Kur, Annette. “Trademark Functions in European Union Law.” Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law Research Paper (2011).
• Lemley, Mark A. “Beyond Preemption: The Law and Policy of Intellectual Property Licensing.” California Law Review 87, no. 1 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/3481005.
• Maskus, Keith E. “The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Encouraging Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfer.” Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 9, no. 1 (1998).
• Merges, Robert P. “Contracting into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations.” California Law Review 84, no. 5 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/3480996.
• Noerhadi, Cita Citrawinda. “Cybercrimes and Alternative Settlement of Intellectual Property (IPR) Disputes in Indonesia.” 16 (2022): 89–109. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4766558.
• Ode, Zuliarti Wa. “Uncharted Water: Indonesia’s Copyright Challenges in the Digital Age.” 4 (2025): 103–119.
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and European Union Intellectual Property Office. Trends in Trade in Counterfeit and Pirated Goods. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/g2g9f533-en
• Panjaitan, Hulman, Andrew Betlehn, Tomson Situmeang, Md Zubair
• Kasem Khan, and Mahadi Hasan Miraz. “Music Copyright
• Protection in the Digital Era: Legal Framework and Strategies for
• Enforcement.” Jurnal Hukum 40 (2024): 235–257.
• https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v40i2.40525.
• Pitta, Oktavia, Marito Manurung, Jinner Sidauruk, and Samuel F. B. Situmorang. “The Legal Arrangements of Intellectual Property Rights in Indonesia on Addressing Priority Watch List Status.” 8 (2025): 277–294.
• Sabela Gayo. “The Use of Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Resolution of Intellectual Property Rights Disputes.” 1 (2022): 101–106.
• Samuelson, Pamela. “Challenges in Mapping the Public Domain.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66, no. 1/2 (2003): 147–171.
• Sell, Susan K. “TRIPS-Plus Free Trade Agreements and Access to Medicines.” Liverpool Law Review 28, no. 1 (2007): 41–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-007-9011-8.
• Sidik, Jafar, Asep Rozali, Dewi Sulistianingsih, and others. “The Implementation of Intellectual Property Dispute.” 52 (2023): 237–248.
• Subrata, Rusli. “Can Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms Revolutionize Conflict and Dispute Resolution in Indonesia?” Jurnal Litigasi 24 (2023): 151–164. https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/litigasi/article/view/7198.
• Sulistyono, Joko. The Potential of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Intellectual Property: Patents in Japan and Indonesia. Atlantis Press SARL, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-218-7.
• Yu, Peter K. “The Global Intellectual Property Order and Its Undetermined Future.” WIPO Journal 1, no. 1 (2009).
• Houston Law Review 46, no. 4 (2009).“Addressing Intellectual Property Crime in Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Justice 1 (2025): 208–229.

How to Cite This

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Copyright and Permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Kosmik Hukum agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Data Availability