Reconstructing Electoral Law Policy to Strengthen the Prevention and Enforcement of Money Politics in Indonesia
Abstract
Elections constitute a fundamental manifestation of democracy, serving as a crucial mechanism connecting candidates and voters. However, electoral contests continue to be undermined by violations, particularly money politics and political dowries. Article 228 explicitly prohibits the giving and receiving of political dowries in the nomination of presidential and vice-presidential candidates, yet the practice of vote-buying through money or goods persists and has increasingly become embedded as a political culture. This phenomenon threatens democratic integrity, weakens clean governance, and undermines the realization of fair elections. This study examines campaign finance regulation as a preventive legal policy against money politics practices. Employing a normative juridical research method, the study relies on primary and secondary legal materials through a statute approach and a comparative approach. The statute approach is conducted by analyzing the regulatory framework governing campaign finance, criminal provisions, and law enforcement mechanisms related to electoral violations. Meanwhile, the comparative approach is carried out through a micro-level examination of campaign finance limitation policies in the United States in order to construct a preventive model applicable within the Indonesian context. Using deductive legal reasoning and legal syllogism, the research positions legal norms as the major premise and correlates them with relevant legal facts to formulate conclusions. The findings indicate that limiting campaign funds serves as a strategic instrument to reduce excessive monetary influence in politics. Strengthening contribution limits, transparency mechanisms, and law enforcement is therefore essential to prevent money politics and safeguard electoral integrity and democratic accountability.
There is no Figure or data content available for this article
References
- Abdul-Razzak, Nour, Carlo Prato, and Stephane Wolton. “After Citizens United: How Outside Spending Shapes American Democracy.” SSRN Electronic Journal, ahead of print, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2823778.
- Ali, Bisyru Maulana, Afwah Muntazah, Nadya Riyanti Rahmawati, Sugianto Sugianto, and Tarmudi Tarmudi. “Implementasi Kebijakan Politik Hukum Dalam Penguatan Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia.” Hutanasyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara 3, no. 2 (2025): 73–81.
- Arianto, Bambang. “Menakar Politik Kekerabatan Dalam Kontestasi Pemilihan Kepala Daerah 2020.” Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Pemerintahan 7, no. 1 (2021): 81–98. https://doi.org/10.37058/jipp.v7i1.2844.
- Arsali, Imroatin, and Nur Lailatul Musyafaah. “Konsepsi Kebijakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Untuk Menjaga Stabilitas Ekonomi Nasional.” Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah Dan Hukum 5, no. 6 (2024): 516–639. https://doi.org/10.15642/mal.v5i6.431.
- Aspinall, Edward, and Ward Berenschot. Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2019.
- Bakharuddin Muhammad Syah. “Relasi Gerakan Aceh Merdeka (GAM), Masyarakat dan TNI-Polri dalam Pandangan Antropologi Kepolisian.” Jurnal Syntax Dmiration 5, no. 5 (2024): 1741–49. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v5i5.1153.
- Basarah, Budiman, and Ulfia Hasanah. “Politik Hukum Dalam Reformasi Regulasi Di Indonesia: (Antara Kepentingan Politik Dan Kepentingan Elit).” Riau Law Journal 8, no. 2 (2025): 148–61. https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.8.2.148-161.
- Britannica. Federal Election Campaign Act United States 1971. 2023. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Federal-Election-Campaign-Act.
- Canaldhy, Rendy Sueztra, Suandi Suandi, and Umi Purwanti. “Perbandingan Sistem Pemilihan Umum Presiden Amerika Serikat Dengan Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi 13, no. 1 (2023): 47–63. https://doi.org/10.33592/jiia.v13i1.3494.
- Casey, Katherine, Abou Bakarr Kamara, and Niccoló Meriggi. An Experiment in Candidate Selection. No. W26160. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26160.
- CBS News. Obama Amassed $745M For Campaign. 2008. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/obama-amassed-745m-for-campaign.
- Cerda, Andy, and Andrew Daniller. “7 Facts about Americans’ Views of Money in Politics.” Pew Research Center, October 23, 2023. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/10/23/7-facts-about-americans-views-of-money-in-politics/.
- Denice Sebold, Karen. Evaluating Campaign Finance Oversight: An Assessment of the Federal Election Commission. 1st ed. Lexington Books, 2024. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216432784.
- Fitriyah, Fitriyah. “Cara Kerja Politik Uang (Studi Kasus Pilkada Dan Pilkades Di Kabupaten Pati).” Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik 6, no. 2 (2016): 101–11. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.6.2.2015.101-111.
- ———. “Fenomena Politik Uang Dalam Pilkada.” Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik 3, no. 1 (2013): 5–14. https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.3.1.2012.5-14.
- Fordham, Rachel Funk. “Anti‐Democratic Influence: The Effect of Citizens United on State Democratic Performance.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 49, no. 3 (August 2024): 455–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12447.
- Garrett, Elizabeth. “The Future of Campaign Finance Reform Laws in the Courts and in Congress.” SSRN Electronic Journal, ahead of print, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.293253.
- Gaughan. “Trump, Twitter, and the Russians: The Growing Obsolescence of Federal Campaign Finance Law.” Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 27, no. 79 (2018). https://gould.usc.edu/why/students/orgs/ilj/assets/docs/27-3-Trump,%20Twitter,%20and%20the%20Russians%20-%20Anthony%20J.%20Gaughan_original.pdf.
- Ghafur, Jamaludin. “Democratization of Legislative Prospective Candidate Selection: Urgency and Its Parameters.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 12, no. 01 (2021): 67. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v12i01.a17036.
- Hellman, Deborah. “A Theory of Bribery.” Cardozo Law Review 38, no. 6 (2017). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2828840.
- Le, Thanh, Ilke Onur, Rubayat Sarwar, and Erkan Yalcin. “Money in Politics: How Does It Affect Election Outcomes?” Sage Open 14, no. 4 (October 2024): 21582440241279659. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241279659.
- League of Women Voters. Money in Politics. July 2, 2021. https://www.lwv.org/voting-rights/money-politics.
- Leo Agustino. “Patronase Politik Era Reformasi: Analisis Pilkada Di Kabupaten Takalar Dan Provinsi Jambi.” Jurnal Administrasi Publik 11, no. 2 (2014). https://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/JAP/article/view/1504.
- Mahmud MD. Politik Hukum Di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2012.
- Muhtadi, Burhanuddin. Vote Buying in Indonesia: The Mechanics of Electoral Bribery. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
- Muhtar, Muhtar, Atikah Khairunnisa, and Joana Tuhumury. “Kuasa Uang Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah: Oligarki, Premanisme Dan Kekuatan Lokal.” Journal of Literature Review 1, no. 2 (2025): 628–47. https://doi.org/10.63822/y2bh5j70.
- Puansah, Irman. “Studi Literatur: Politik Uang Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik, Dan Humaniora 8, no. 2 (2024): 778–87. https://doi.org/10.31604/jim.v8i2.2024.708-717.
- Schnakenberg, Keith E., and Ian R. Turner. “Helping Friends or Influencing Foes: Electoral and Policy Effects of Campaign Finance Contributions.” SSRN Electronic Journal, ahead of print, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2698862.
- Sharma, Srishti, Musssaib Mir, and Santosh Kumar. “Money and Politics: The Influence of Billionaires in the 2024 U.S. Election Cycle.” Journal of Political Science and International Relations 8, no. 3 (2025): 206–10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jpsir.20250803.20.
- Simamora, Merlindang, Bolivia Renata Sianipar, Balqis Zhofayra Alya, Raihan Ananda Azma, Jennifer Olivia Annisa Putri, Hairunisa Astari, Jelvan Andi Putra Lase, and Taufiq Ramadhan. “Menegakkan Prinsip Keadilan Dan Kejujuran Dalam Demokrasi: Berani Tolak Politik Uang.” JISPENDIORA Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Pendidikan Dan Humaniora 4, no. 2 (2025): 372–86. https://doi.org/10.56910/jispendiora.v4i2.2315.
- Teso, Edoardo. “Influence-Seeking in U.S. Corporate Elites’ Campaign Contribution Behavior.” Review of Economics and Statistics 107, no. 3 (2025): 685–96. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01321.
How to Cite This
Copyright and Permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Kosmik Hukum agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.


