Fraudulent Financial Reporting Reviewed from The Perspective of Hexagon Fraud Theory: A Study of Companies Received Special Notation from BEI

Authors

  • Mishola Esnawati Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Dona Primasari Universitas Jenderal Soedirman
  • Siti Maghfiroh Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/kompartemen.v23i1.24419

Keywords:

Financial Reporting, Fraudulent Financial Reporting, Hexagon Fraud Theory

Abstract

Fraudulent financial reporting remains a threat to the integrity of global capital markets, undermining investor confidence and causing significant financial losses. This study investigates the factors that influence fraudulent financial reporting using the Hexagon Fraud Theory as a theoretical framework. Data were collected from 138 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange that received special notation in 2023. The independent variables used are stimulus/pressure, competence/capability, collusion, opportunity, rationalization, and ego/arrogance. This study uses a quantitative approach with multiple regression analysis. The findings show that opportunity is positively correlated with fraudulent financial reporting, stimulus/pressure shows a negative effect. Conversely, competence/ capability, collusion, rationalization, and ego/arrogance do not affect fraudulent financial reporting. These results highlight the complex interaction between internal and external pressures in organizations and emphasize the need for strong internal controls to reduce the risk of fraudulent financial reporting.

References

Albrecht, W.S., Albrecht, C., & Albrecht, CO (2012). Fraud Examination (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2022). 2022 Report to the Nations: Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse.

Beasley, M. S. (1996). An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of Directors Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443-465. doi: 10.1504/IJMED.2018.10017526

Beasley, M.S., Carcello, J.V., & Hermanson, D.R. (2010). Fraudulent financial reporting: 1998-2007, an analysis of US public companies. COSO Report.

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money; a study of the social psychology of embezzlement. Patterson Smith.

Dechow, P., Ge, W., Larson, C.R., & Sloan, R.G. (2011). Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 17- 82. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x

Dewi, RK & Hardiyanto, S. (2019). A Series of Cases That Entangled Garuda Indonesia Airlines in 2019. Accessed on October 1, 2024 from: https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2019/12/05/192430765/sederet-kasus- yang-menjerat-maskapai-garuda-indonesia-di-2019?page=all

Kartikasari, MD, Sumarno, S., & Fitriani, RN (2021). Detection of fraudulent financial reporting through the Crowe as Fraud Pentagon Theory in primary consumer goods indexed. Journal of Modernization Economy, 17(2), 125- 138. https://doi.org/10.21067/jem.v17i2.5484

Ludwianto, B. & Fikrie, M. (2020). Luckin Coffee Startup Fake Profit Scandal, Starbucks' 'Failed' Competitor. Retrieved October 1, 2024 from: https://kumparan.com/kumparantech/skandal-cuan-palsu-startup-kopi- luckin-coffee-pesaing-gagal-starbucks-1tbDYpm6XJL/full

Meidijati, M., & Amin, MNA (2022). Detecting Fraudulent Financial Reporting Through Hexagon Fraud Model: Moderating Role of Income Tax Rate. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 3(2), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v3i2.196

Murphy, P. R., & Dacin, M. T. (2011). Psychological Pathways to Fraud: Understanding and Preventing Fraud in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 601-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0741-0

Nadziliyah, H., & Primasari, N.S. (2022). Analisis Fraud Hexagon Terhadap Financial Statement Fraud pada Perusahaan Sektor Infrastruktur, Utilitas dan Transportasi. Accounting and Finance Studies, 2(1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.47153/afs21.2702022

Sandria, F. (2021). A Series of Financial Report Scandals in the Indonesian Stock Market, Indofarma-Hanson. Accessed on October 1, 2024 from: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20210726191301-17- 263827/deretan-skandal-lapkeu-di-pasar-saham-ri-indofarma-hanson

Schrand, C. M., & Zechman, S. L. (2012). Executive overconfidence and the slippery slope to financial misreporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1-2), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.09.001

Setyono, D., Hariyanto, E., Wahyuni, S., & Pratama, B.C (2023). Penggunaan Fraud Hexagon dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Owner: Research and Accounting Journal, 7(2), 1036-1048. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i2.1325

Situngkir, NC, & Triyanto, DN (2020). Detecting fraudulent financial reporting using fraud score model and fraud pentagon theory: Empirical study of companies listed in the LQ 45 Index. The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 23(3), 373-410. http://doi.org/10.33312/ijar.486

Sukmadilaga, C., Winarningsih, S., Handayani, T., Herianti, E., & Ghani, EK (2022). Fraudulent financial reporting in ministerial and governmental institutions in Indonesia: An analysis using hexagon theory. Economies, 10(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10040086

Wolfe, D.T., & Hermanson, D.R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38-42.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-02

How to Cite

Esnawati, M., Primasari, D., & Maghfiroh, S. (2025). Fraudulent Financial Reporting Reviewed from The Perspective of Hexagon Fraud Theory: A Study of Companies Received Special Notation from BEI. Kompartemen : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 23(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.30595/kompartemen.v23i1.24419

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.