Constructing the Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) To Analyse the Impact of Goods and Services Tax (GST) on Government Revenue and Targeted Household of M40 and B40 in Malaysia

Suriyani Binti Saidi, Mukaramah Binti Harun, Norrazman Zaiha Bin Zainol

Abstract


Computable general equilibrium (CGE) models have been widely used in economic policy analysis in recent years. The selection of the model is based on the CGE model’s ability to see the effects on sectors, household groups, governments, and even able to see the overall economic impact for a time period. In Malaysia, the issues arise from the impact of policies analysed in the CGE modelling framework have been constrained in part by the completion of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM). The main purpose of this paper is to propose a new Malaysian CGE model framework to analyse the impact of implementation of GST on government revenue and welfare of targeted household groups of B40 and M40 in Malaysia. The CGE model developed in the present paper is based on more recent data in Malaysian SAM (2014). Then the data was modified to suit with Malaysian CGE for GST, namely the MYGST_CGE model. This paper describes the structure of MYGST_CGE, with 33 activities, 33 commodities, 7 types of labour, and 7 categories of household groups were constructed. The CGE utilized in the present study can be applied to answer questions concerning whether GST implementation would have the trade-off between government revenue and the targeted groups by taking into account the elements of GST such as standard-rate, zero-rate and exempted rate. For the purpose of policy analysis, simulation exercises are conducted using the multi-sectoral, multi-factorial and multi-households approach. Based on the proposed framework model review, the instruments used for measurement of effectiveness and welfare were C-efficiency ratio, regressive, progressive, equivalent variation and simulations. The paper will give an opportunity for future research work in a related area.

 

 


References


Acharya, S. (2016). Reforming value-added tax system in the developing world: the case of Nepal. Business and Management Studies, 2(2), 44–63. http://doi.org/10.11114/bms.v2i2.1616Alston, J. M., & Larson, D. M. (1993). Hicksian vs. Marshallian welfare measures: why do we do what we do? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75(3), 764–769. http://doi.org/10.2307/1243588Avitsland, T., & Aasness, J. (2004). Combining CGE and microsimulation models : Effects on equality of VAT reforms, (392).BNM. (2014). Annual report 2014.Brendon, C. (2013). Efficiency, equity, and optimal income taxation. Job Market Paper, (November), 1–52.Bye, B., Strøm, B., & Åvitsland, T. (2003). Welfare effect of VAT reforms: a general equilibrium analysis. International Tax and Public Finance, (343).Devarajan, S., J.D., L., Go, D. S., Robinson, S., & Sinko, P. (1997). Simple general equilibrium modelling. Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis, 156–185.Devarajan, S., & Robinson, S. (2002). The Impact of computable general equilibrium models on policy. Frontiers in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling, (May), 1–21. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614330.016Erero, J. L. (2015). Effects of increases in value-added tax: a dynamic cge approach effects of increases in value-added tax: a dynamic cge approach, (November).Fullerton, D., Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1983). Replacing the U.S. income tax with a progressive consumption tax. A sequenced general equilibrium approach. Journal of Public Economics, 20(1), 3–23. http://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(83)90018-XGale, W. G., & Rohaly, J. (2002). Effects of tax simplification options on equity, efficiency, and simplicity : a quantitative analysis. Conference on Crisis in Tax Administration Local: Brookings Inst, Washington, DC Data: NOV 07-08, 2002. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.563.1449&rep=rep1&type=pdfGiesecke, J. A., & Tran, N. H. (2009). Modelling value-added tax in the presence of multiproduction and differentiated exemptions, (44017).Go, D. S., Bank, W., Kearney, M., Africa, S., Treasury, N., Robinson, S., … Academy, U. S. N. (2005). An analysis of South Africa’s value-added tax.Hassan, A. A. G., Saari, M. Y., Utit, C., Hassan, A., & Mukaramah-Harun. (2016). Penganggaran impak pelaksanaan cbp ke atas kos pengeluaran dan kos sara hidup di Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 50(2), 15–30. http://doi.org/10.17576/JEM-2016-5001-02Kearney, M. (2003). Restructuring value added tax in South Africa: a computable general equilibrium analysis. University of Pretoria.Keen, M., & Lockwood, B. (2010). The value-added tax: Its causes and consequences. Journal of Development Economics, 92(2), 138–151. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.01.012Levin, J., & Sayeed, Y. (2014). Welfare impact of broadening VAT by exempting local food markets: The case of Bangladesh, 0–24. Retrieved from https://www.oru.se/globalassets/oru-sv/institutioner/hh/workingpapers/workingpapers2014/wp-7-2014.pdfLledo, V. D. (2005). Tax systems under fiscal adjustment : a dynamic cge analysis of the Brazilian tax reform, 33.Lofgren, H., Thomas, M., & El-said, M. (2002). A standard computable general equilibrium (cge) model in gams.NCAER. (2009). Moving to goods and Services Tax in India : impact on India ’ s growth and international trade.Okyere, E., & Bhattarai, R. K. (2005). Welfare and growth impacts of taxes : applied general equilibrium models of Ghana, (August), 1–33.Prof, B. Y., & Ajakaiye, O. (1999). Macroeconomic effects of VAT in Nigeria : A computable general equilibrium analysis. The African Economic Research Consortium.Rege, S. R. (2002). A general equilibrium analysis of VAT in India. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 14(2), 153–188. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-940X.00053Saira, A., Ahmed, V., & Ahsan, A. (2010). Taxation Reforms : A CGE - microsimulation analysis for Pakistan.Sajadifar, S. H., Khiabani, N., & Arakelyan, A. (2012). A computable general equilibrium model for evaluating the effects of value-added tax reform in Iran. World Applied Sciences Journal, 18(7), 918–924. http://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.18.07.1772Tamaoka, M. (1994). Tax : Tax credit method and subtraction method — a Japanese case. Fiscal Studies, 15(2), 57–73.Unit Perancang Ekonomi. (2015). Rancangan Malaysia Ke-11 (2016-2020). Unit Perancang Ekonomi, Jabatan Perdana Menteri. Retrieved from http://www.epu.gov.myAmerican Psychological Association. 2001. Publications Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.) Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.Feldman, D. C. 2004. The devil is in the details: Converting good research into publishable articles. Journal of Management, 30(1): 1-6.Leedy, P. D., and J. E. Omrod. 2005. Practical Research: Planning and Design (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merril Prentice Hall.Perry, C., D. Carson, and A. Gilmore. 2003. Joining the conversation: Writing for EJM’s editors, reviewers and readers requires planning, care and persistence. European Journal of Marketing, 37(5/6): 653-557.Summers, J. O. 2001. Guideline for conducting research and publishing in marketing: From conceptualization through the review process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(4): 405-415.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.30595/kompartemen.v16i2.4045

Copyright (c) 2019 Kompartemen: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2579-8928