Genotype-Dependent Optimization of In Vitro Regeneration and Phytohormone Responses in Sugarcane

Authors

  • Ghulam Farooque Department of Biotechnology, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan
  • Arfa University of Sindh Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/agritech.v28i1.28313

Keywords:

Genotype-specific responses, Micropropagation, Plant regeneration, Phytohormone, Saccharum officinarum

Abstract

In vitro regeneration plays an essential role in developing crop improvement through targeted use of phytohormones. The experiment was carried out at the Nuclear Institute of Agriculture, Tando Jam, and investigated the genotypic variability in the in vitro regeneration of three sugarcanes (Saccharum Officinarum L.) genotypes (BL4, Thatta-10, NIA-2004) on phytohormone-supplemented Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium to optimize propagation protocols. BL4 showed the highest callus induction (4.97 g) on MS with 5.0 mg/L 2,4‑dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4‑D), while NIA-2004 exhibited the lowest. Regeneration efficiency was greatest for NIA-2004 (28.11 plantlets) on media with 3.0 mg/L indole‑3‑acetic acid (IAA), indole‑3‑butyric acid (IBA), and kinetin, whereas BL4 produced the tallest shoots (14.0 cm) on the same medium. Rooting performance also varied; Thatta-10 produced the most roots (25.11 plantlets) and NIA-2004 the longest roots (7.52 cm) on ½-strength MS with 2.0 mg/L IBA. These results demonstrate genotype-specific phytohormone sensitivity, underscoring the need for customized protocols to develop elite, disease-free cultivars.

References

Ali, A., et al. (2020). Pest and disease threats to sugarcane in South Asia. Crop Protection, 135, 104822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.104822

Ali, S., et al. (2022). Hormonal orchestration in sugarcane. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 190, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.08.001

Chengalrayan, K., & Gallo-Meagher, M. (2001). Somatic embryogenesis in sugarcane. Plant Cell Reports, 20(3), 221-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990100329

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2023). World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2023. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc8166en

Gill, R., et al. (2020). Somatic embryogenesis in sugarcane: Current advances and future prospects. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Plant, 56(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-019-10029-z

Iqbal, M., et al. (2021). Yield gaps and production constraints in Pakistani sugarcane systems. Agricultural Systems, 193, 103221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103221

Khan, S., et al. (2019). Micropropagation of sugarcane: A review of challenges and opportunities. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 138(3), 487–503. Fdhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-019-01644-0

Khan, M.T., et al. (2021). Cytokinin-mediated shoot proliferation. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Plant, 57(5), 789-801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-021-10206-z

Kumar, R., et al. (2021). Sugarcane waste-to-wealth: Valorization of bagasse and molasses. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 148, 111592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111592

Lakshmanan, P., Geijskes, R. J., Aitken, K. S., Grof, C. P. L., Bonnett, G. D., & Smith, G. R. (2006). Sugarcane biotechnology: The challenges and opportunities. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Plant, 42(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2005719

Mehta, D., et al. (2021). DNA methylation patterns influence sugarcane regeneration capacity. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 678492. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.678492

Murashige, T., & Skoog, F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15(3), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x

Pakistan Economic Survey. (2022–23). Agriculture Chapter. Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan.

Raza, G., et al. (2021). Optimization of auxin-cytokinin combinations for sugarcane callus induction and shoot regeneration. Scientific Reports, 11, 12345. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91703-4

Ribeiro, A.P.O., et al. (2021). Targeted mutagenesis in sugarcane. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 715351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.715351

Rocha, D., et al. (2023). Cost-effective tissue culture for sugarcane farmers in developing countries. Biotechnology Advances, 64, 108123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108123

Santos, F., et al. (2022). Sugarcane: A key crop for food and energy security. Industrial Crops and Products, 176, 114321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114321

Sharma, P., et al. (2018). Differential gene expression in sugarcane. Journal of Plant Physiology, 231, 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2018.06.003

Silva, T., et al. (2018). Hyperhydricity in sugarcane micropropagation: Causes and solutions. Plant Cell Reports, 37(10), 1389–1402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-018-2316-3

Snyman, S., et al. (2019). Scaling up sugarcane micropropagation in bioreactors. Plant Cell Reports, 38(12), 1465–1477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-019-02462-6

Sundar, A.R., et al. (2023). CRISPR editing in sugarcane. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 21(9), 1823-1835. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.14112

USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. (2024). Sugar: World Markets and Trade. https://doi.org/10.47886/FAS2024

Zhang, L., et al. (2022). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of hormone pathways in sugarcane for improved regeneration. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 20(5), 891–903. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13782

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

Issue

Section

Articles