ADAPTASI TIGA VARIETAS PEPAYA (MERAH DELIMA, JUPE, MADU) DI LAHAN KERING DATARAN RENDAH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30595/agritech.v21i2.5670Keywords:
Carica papaya L., dry land, level of sweetnessAbstract
Papaya fruit (Carica papaya L.) is classified as having high economic value and is being developed by many farmer. A common problem is the papaya variety that farmer \s develop usually from careless seeds, so the production and quality are low. The aim of this research is to introduce superior papaya and have good quality. Three varieties papaya are used in this study, namely: Merah Delima, Jupe, and Madu.The research location is located in the dry land of Banturung, Palangka Raya City. The result that the land suitability class of the study site included S3wa,on, which is Marginal Suitability with the heaviest inhibiting factors of water availability and oxygen availability. On Growth parameters, then Merah Delima has the largest stem circumference of 10,1 cm althought it is not significantly different from other varieties 8,8 cm. While the plant height is the best Merah Delima papaya and signficantly different from Madu. Interms of Productioan Jupe has a number of Fruits (38 fruits/tree) that are significantly different from Madu, and the weight of fruit (1,2 kg/fruit) is significantly different from Merah Delima., and fruit weight per tree 34,1 kg is significantly different from the other two varieties. Base on the sweetness level, the sweetest Merah Delima reaches 9,1 oBrix significantly different from Jupe (6,9 oBrix) and Madu (6,6 oBrix). Parameters of growth, productionand quality of papaya can still be improved by improving the management of inhibiting factors.
References
Ali, A., S. Devarajan, M.I. Waly, M.M. Essa. And M.S. Rahman. 2011. Nutritional and medical values papaya (Carica papaya L.). Nova Science Publisher, Inc. P:1-18.
Budiyanti, T. 2016. Efek heterosis dan aksi gen ukuran buah pada hibrida pepaya. Jur. Agroekotek. 8(1):38-46.
__________ dan Sunyoto. 2011. Varietas unggul baru pepaya merah delima si merah yang manis. Sinar Tani. Edisi 2-8 Nopember. No. 3429 Tahun XLII. Hal 5-7.
__________ dan Noflindawati. 21012. Pepaya Merah Delima dalam meningkatkan pendapatan dan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Inovasi Hortikultura Pengungkit Peningkatan Pendapatan Rakyat. Hal: 141-147.
BP3K Tangkiling. 2018. Laporan curah hujan Kecamatan Bukit Batu. Kota Palangka Raya. 15 hal.
Ceccoli, G., E.S. Panigo, N. Garglio, J.C. Favro, and C.A. Bouzo. 2013. Fruit yield nd growth prameters of several Carica papaya L. Genotypes in a temperate climate. Rev. FCA UNCUYO. 45(2):299-310.
FAO. 1976. A framework for land evaluation. Soil Resources Management and Conservation Service. Land and Water Development Division. FAO Soil Bulletin No.Development Division. FAO Soil Bulletin No.2. FAO-UNO, Rome.
Fatria, D., dan Noflindawati. 2014. Karakteristik kualitas buah empat genotip papaya (Carica papaya L.) koleksi Balai Penelitian Tanaman Buah Tropika. J. Floratek. 9:1-5.
Firmansyah, M.A. 2014. Manisnya Budidaya Pepaya di lahan gambut. Tabloid Sinar Tani. 27 Janurai 2014.
Indriyati, N.L.P., Affandi, dan D. Sunarwati. 2008. Pengelolaan kebun pepaya sehat. Balai Penelitian Tanaman Buah Tropika. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hortikultura. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Kementerian Pertanian. 33 hal.
Limbong, J. 2012. Analisis kelayakan finansial usahatani pepaya (Carica papaya L.) di Muang Dalam Kelurahan Lempake Kecamatan Samarinda Utara. EPP. 9(2):1-7.
Martias, F. Nasution, Noflindawati, T. Budiyanti, dan Y. Hilman. 2011. Respon pertumbuhan dan produksi pepaya terhadap pemupukan Nitrogen dan Kalium di Lahan Rawa Pasang Surut. J. Hort. 21(4):324-330.
Medina, J.D.L.C., G.V. Guiterrez, and H.S. Garcia. 2003. Pawpaw: post-harvest operation. Food andriculture Organization of The United Nations. 70p.
Olubode, O.O. 2012. Influence of seasonal variations on component of pawpaw / okra mixtures in a pawpaw based cropping system. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture. 28:1-15.
Olubode, O.O., O.M. Odeyemi, and I.O.O.Aiyelaagbe. 2016. Influence of environmental factor and production practice on the growth and productivity of pawpaw (Carica papaya L.) in South Western Nigeria-A Review. Fruits. 71(6):341-361.
Pesqueirq, M.C., and J.N. farfan. 2017. Domestication and genetics of papaya: a review. Frontier in Ecology and Evolution. 5:1-9. www. frontiersin.org.
Prihatiningtyas, R., A. Setiawan, N.H. Wijaya. 2015. Analisis kualitas pada rantai pasok buah papaya Calina. Jurnal Manajemen dan Organisasi. 6(3):206-224.
Ritung, S., K. Nugroho, A. Mulyani, dan E. Suryanti. 2011. Petunjuk teknis evaluasi lahan untuk komoditas pertanian. Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Kementerian Pertanian. 161 hal.
Silva, J.R., W.P. Rodrigues., K.F. Ruas, J.S.Paixiao, R.S. Nunes de Lima, J.A.M. Filho, J.A.C. Garcia, B. Scaffer, J.C. Gonzales, and E. Compostrini. 2019. Light, photosynthetic capacity and growth of papaya (Carica papaya L.): a short review. AJCS. 13(3):480-485).
Sunyoto, T. Budiyanti, Noflindawati, D. Fatria. 2013. Uji stabilitas lima genotipe pepaya di tiga lokasi. J. Hort. 23(2):129-136.
_________, L. Octriana, D. Fatria, Hendri, dan Kusnadi. 2015. Evaluasi pertumbuhan dan hasil beberapa pepaya hibrida di wilyah pengembangan Bogor. J. Hort. 25(3):193-200.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
