Peer Review Process

1. Islamdina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam maintain the standards of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process.
2. The initial review process is at least 8 months.
3. All research articles published in Islamdina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam undergo full peer review, key characteristics of which are listed below:

• All research articles are reviewed by at least two suitably qualified experts
• All publication decisions are made by the journals’ Editors-in-Chief on the basis of the reviews provided 
• All submitted manuscripts must be free from plagiarism content. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to do the similarity checking (please use Turnitin or iThenticate to check the similarity). Editors will also check the similarity of manuscripts in this journal by using a Turnitin or iThenticate software.
• The submitted manuscripts to this journal will be peer-reviewed at least one or two expert reviewers from Peer-Reviewers Team. The reviewers give scientific valuable comments improving the contents of the manuscript. Sometimes (if required) a third peer-reviewer is needed to give critical comments to the submitted manuscript. The review process used in this journal is a blind review system.
• The final decision of manuscript acceptance is solely made by Editor in Chief and/or Regional/Associate (Handling) Editor (together with Editorial Board, if required) according to reviewers' critical comments. The final decision of the manuscript is solely based on the Editor's final review which considering peer-reviewers comments (but not solely by Reviewer).