Civil Voices and Military Echoes: Media Responses to the Army’s Political Intervention In 1952

Authors

  • Arifin Suryo Nugroho Universitas Gadjah Mada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30595/jssh.v9i2.28511

Keywords:

17 October 1952 incident, army political intervention, media response

Abstract

This article examines the responses of the mass media to the Indonesian Army’s political intervention during the 17 October 1952 Incident, employing a historical research method that includes the stages of heuristics, source verification, interpretation, and historiography. The incident not only shook civil–military relations but also ignited fierce debates among the Indonesian press in the early 1950s. The mass media, serving as the main instrument of public opinion formation, were divided into two major camps: the Merdeka newspaper on one side, and Indonesia Raya and Pedoman on the other. Under the leadership of B.M. Diah, Merdeka firmly condemned the Army’s actions, viewing them as a coup attempt against the constitutional government and warning of the dangers of military authoritarianism to democracy. Conversely, Indonesia Raya and Pedoman perceived the military intervention as a reaction to an unstable parliamentary system plagued by political intrigues. Through an analysis of editorials, opinion pieces, and the personal connections between press figures and the military, this study reveals that the divergent stances of the media reflected ideological tensions between civil supremacy and military political legitimacy—serving as an early mirror of civil–military dynamics in Indonesia’s post-independence political history.

References

Atmakusumah, (1992). Mochtar Lubis Wartawan Jihad. Jakarta: Kompas.

Barry, T., (2018). A. H. Nasution and Indonesia’s Elites “People’s Resistance” in the War of Independence and Postwar Politics. New York: Lexington Books.

Cribb, R., (2001). “Military Strategy in the Indonesian Revolution: Nasution’s Concept of ‘Total People’s War’ in Theory and Practice”, War and Society, Vol. 19, No. 2, (October).

Feith, H., (1962). The Decline of Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia, Ithaca: Cornel University Press.

Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P, (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics, Cambridge University Press.

Hill, David T., (2011). Jurnalisme dan Politik di Indonesia: Biografi Kritis Mochtar Lubis (1922-2004) Sebagai Pemimpin Redaksi dan Pengarang (terj.), Jakarta: YOI.

Kakiailatu, T., (1997). BM Diah Wartawan Serba Bisa, Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Kuntowijoyo, (1995). Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah, Yogyakarta: Bentang.

Lawson, Chappell, (2002). Building the Fourth Estate: Democratization and the Rise of a Free Press in Mexico, Berkeley: University of California Press.

McVey, R., (1971). ‘The Post-Revolutionary Transformation of the Indonesian Army’, Indonesia, 11 (April).

Nugroho, N., (1991). Pejuang dan Prajurit, Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

O’Donnell, Guillermo, and Philippe C. Schmitter, (1986). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Said, T. dkk., (2021).Wartawan Bersuara Merdeka. Jakarta: Metaforma.

Said, T., (1988). Sejarah Pers Nasional dan Pembangunan Pers Pancasila, Jakarta: Haji Masagung.

Sartono, K., (1982). Pemikiran dan Perkembangan Historiografi Indonesia Suatu Alternatif, Jakarta: Gramedia.

Serikat Penerbit Suratkabar, (1971). Garis Besar Perkembangan Pers Indonesia, Jakarta: Penerbit SPS.

Voltmer, Katrin, (2013). The Media in Transitional Democracies, Cambridge: Polity Press.

“Ada Tidaknya Coup D’etat” yang dimuat di harian Merdeka 31 Oktober 1952.

“Beberapa Pertanyaan tentang Peristiwa 17 Oktober 1952 oleh BM Diah”, Merdeka 13 Nopember 1952.

“Demonstrasi Rakjat Menuntut Pembubaran Parlemen”, Indonesia Raya, pada 17 Oktober 1952.

“Di Pinggir Jalan,” Indonesia Raya, pada 17 Oktober 1952.

“Diah tjeritakan jang terdjadi thd dirinja pada 17 Oktober”, Merdeka 17 Nopember 1953.

“Menindjau latar belakang demonstrasi”, 17 Oktober, Merdeka, 7 Nopember 195

“Parlemen Diperalat Bekas-Bekas Menteri buat Menuntut Perubahan Pimpinan AP”, Pedoman, 9 Oktober 1952.

“Perhatian Politik Terhadap Tentara Timbulkan Suasana Tegang”, Pedoman, 5 Oktober 1955.

“Pertemuan pemuka2 Masjumi dan Menteri Pertahanan”, Merdeka, 8 Oktober 1952. “Dikalangan Masjumi terdapat 2 aliran”, Merdeka, 9 Oktober 1952.

“PSI tidak Akan Mempengaruhi Kementerian Pertahanan”, Pedoman, 2 Oktober 1952.

“Sebaiknja Parlemen Dibubarkan”, Indonesia Raya, 16 Oktober 1952.

“Sebaiknya parlemen dibubarkan”, Pedoman, 17 Oktober 1952.

“Sejarah dan Latar Belakang Tiga Buah Mossi di Parlemen I”, Indonesia Raya, 21 Oktober 1952.

“Sifat2 istimewa sbg peladjaran dari kedjadian 17 Oktober”, Merdeka, 15 Nopember 1952.

“Tuntutan Pembubaran Parlemen Justru Jalan Guna Mencapai Parlementerisme yang Sehat”, Pedoman, 28 Oktober 1952.

“Kebulatan Tentara Mau Dilemahkan oleh Mr Roem”, Indonesia Raya, 20 Oktober 1952.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Nugroho, A. S. (2025). Civil Voices and Military Echoes: Media Responses to the Army’s Political Intervention In 1952. JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial Dan Humaniora), 9(2), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.30595/jssh.v9i2.28511

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.