“KA’EN KELUN BA MALU” IN DISTRIBUTION OF CULTURE AND LEVEL OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
Abstract
Community participation is very important and contributes to the effectiveness of the resulting development planning. However, until now community participation has not been realized ideally. Previous studies have offered various efforts to increase community participation, namely increased local community initiatives (Muhlinghaus & Walty, 2001), development of government and community cooperation (Pandey & Miznikov, 2001), integration of art and planning (Burford, Kissmann, Rosado- May, Dzul, & Harder, 2012), optimizing the role of social capital (Cerar, 2014), socialization to the bottom of the community (Defina, 2012), participatory leadership (Alyas, 2015), allocation of village funds (Atmojo, Eko, Fridayani, Kasiwi, & Pratama, 2017) and optimizing the role of young people as mobilizers (Fitriani, Selinaswati, & Mardiah, 2017). Unfortunately, there has not been an assessment effort that looks at the cultural side. This qualitative case study examines efforts to increase community participation by considering cultural factors that can contribute to the effectiveness of development planning at the village level. Data obtained through in-depth interviews, participant observation and documentation. This study found that the culture factor of mamfatin ukunrai could inhibit community participation in Naran Village. The community believes that planning development is the duty of the government so that it should not actively participate in planning meetings. Therefore, the researcher offers a model of the family code as an effort to reduce the impact of the culture. Ka'en kelun ba ashamed to represent the government's invitation to cooperate with the community for the realization of development from the ground level.
Keywords
References
Alyas. (2015). Lurah dan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembangunan di Kelurahan Cabenge Kecamatan Lilirilau Kabupaten Soppeng. Sosiohumaniora, 17(1), 84–96.
Atmojo, Eko, M., Fridayani, H. D., Kasiwi, A. N., & Pratama, M. A. (2017). Efektivitas dana desa untuk pengembangan potensi ekonomi berbasis partisipasi masyarakat di Desa Bangunjiwo Muhammad Eko Atmojo , Helen Dian Fridayani , Aulia Nur Kasiwi , Mardha Adhi Pratama Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan , FISIP Univeristas Muhammadiya. ARIST Sosial Politik Humaniora, 5(1), 126–140.
Burford, G., Kissmann, S., Rosado-May, F. J., Dzul, S. H. A., & Harder, M. K. (2012). Indigenous Participation in Intercultural Education. Ecology and Society, 17(4). Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/26269242
Cerar, A. (2014). From reaction to initiative: Potentials of contributive participation. Urbani Izziv, 25(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2014-25-01-002
Defina. (2012). The Community Participation and Socialization in Empowering Program ( PPMK ) at Klender Village. Penyuluhan, 9(2).
Fitriani, E., Selinaswati, & Mardiah, D. (2017). Partisipasi Asyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Ekowisata Sungai Pinang. Socius, 4(1), 83–96.
Iswahyudi, F. (2012). EFEKTIFITAS PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM PERBAIKAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK (Studi Kasus Pelaksanaan Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Nomor 13 Tahun 2009 tentang Pedoman Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik dengan Partisipasi Masyarakat pada Dinas. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 8(3), 310–340.
Mbeche, R. (2017). Climbing The Ladder of Participation Symbolic or Subtantive Representation in Preparing Uganda for REDD+. Conservation and Society, 15(4), 426–438. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs
Muhlinghaus, S., & Walty, S. (2001). Endogenous development in Swiss mountain communities: Local initiatives in Urnasch and Schamserberg. Mountain Research and Development, 21(3), 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2001)021{[}0236:EDISMC]2.0.CO;2
Ompusunggu, V. (2017). Peranan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Desa. Jurnal Sektor Publik, 10(1), 95–102. Retrieved from http://pep3d.jabarprov.go.id/index.php/berita/artikel/77-peranan-partisipasi-masyarakat-dalam-perencanaan-pembangunan-desa
Pandey, K., & Miznikov, Y. (2001). Decentralization and Corruption. Mountain Research and Development, 21(October), 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2004.11051256
Rostam, N. G., Ansari, M., & Vinejad, M. M. (2018). A Scientometric Review of Citizen Participation Research World Trend. Theoretical and Empirical Research in Urban Management, 13(3), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2010-21-02-006
Rumensten, I. (2012). Model Ideal Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Sagita, N. I. (2016). Partisipasi Warga Masyarakat Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Kecamatan Di Kota Bandung. CosmoGov, 2(2), 308–329. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v2i2.10009
Yin, Robert K. (2015). Studi Kasus : Desain dan Metode. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada
DOI: 10.30595/jssh.v3i2.5056
Copyright (c) 2019 JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Humaniora)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN: 2549-9505
|