Maxim violations and their reasons in an animated movie: a Gricean approach to communication
Abstract
This study analyzes the utterances of maxim violation produced by characters in the 2022 animated film, Puss in Boots: The Last Wish, as well as the motivations underlying them. Using a qualitative research method, content analysis techniques are used to conduct the analysis. The analysis adopted Grice's Cooperation Principle, which incorporates Grice's Maxims, and their violation, as well as additional hypotheses from other experts regarding the rationale for such violations. To support the analysis, this research involved an expert in the pragmatic field specially to provide analysis related to the types of maxims used and the reasons for using these maxims. This study uncovered a total of 51 utterances of maxim violations in the characters’ talks. They can be categorized as the violations of the following maxims: 21 (41.1%) of quality, 16 (31.3%) of quantity, 7 (13.7%) of manner, and 6 (11.7%) of relevance. There are six types of reasons for using maxims violations, namely communicating personal interests, Avoiding discussion, Pleasing interlocutors, Saving face, Misleading listeners, Extending answers. The characters violated the maxims in a variety of contexts and for a variety of reasons, but primarily out of a wish to express their individual self-interests.
There is no Figure or data content available for this article
References
Albiansyah, A., Hidayat, D. N., & Alek, A. (2021). An Analysis of Maxims Violation Acted by the Main Characters in the “Tilik” Short Film. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.19105/ojbs.v15i1.4146
Amianna, J. N. R. P., & Putranti, A. (2017). Humorous situations created by violations and floutings of conversational maxims in a situation comedy entitled how i met your mother. Journal of Language and Literature, 17(1), 97–107.
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
Blanchflower, T. M. (2018). Research Design: quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. WILEY 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA.
Castro, D., Rigby, J. M., Cabral, D., & Nisi, V. (2021). The binge-watcher’s journey: Investigating motivations, contexts, and affective states surrounding Netflix viewing. Convergence, 27(1), 3–20.
Eso, A., Martisa, E., & RAF, J. (2020). Violation of Maxim in Paranoid Schizophrenia Patients’ Conversation. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Languare, Literature, Culture and Education, ISLLCE, 15-16 November 2019, Kendari, Indonesia. EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.15-11-2019.2296436
Fadillah, M., & Imperiani, E. D. A. (2020). An Analysis of Non-Observance Maxims in Customs Protection. Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200406.026
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts, 3, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agw081
Jemielniak, D., & Ciesielska, M. (2018). Qualitative Research in Organization Studies. In Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies (pp. 1–5). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65217-7_1
Khan, M., Tahir, M. A., & Ahmed, Z. (2018). Detection of Violent Content in Cartoon Videos Using Multimedia Content Detection Techniques. 2018 IEEE 21st International Multi-Topic Conference (INMIC), 1–5. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/INMIC.2018.8595563
Khusna, F. A., Aliyah, S. L., & Asyifah, D. A. (2021). Investigating the Use of Maxims in the EFL Class Presentation: A Pragmatic Study. SAGA: Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.21460/saga.2021.22.80
Mangilaya, V. M. (2020). A rat in a maze: Analysis of violation and flouting of maxims in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics. 9 (2).
Mann, S. (2011). A Critical Review of Qualitative Interviews in Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq043
Mattingly, H. H., Transtrum, M. K., Abbott, M. C., & Machta, B. B. (2018). Maximizing the information learned from finite data selects a simple model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(8), 1760–1765. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715306115
Medelyan, A. (2020). Coding qualitative data: How to code qualitative research. Thematic Analysis Inc.
Noertjahjo, E., Arifin, M. B., & Ariani, S. (2017). Analysis of flouting and violating towards maxim of quality in MY SISTER’S KEEPER novel. Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni Dan Budaya, 1(3), 206.
Pan, Y. (2020). Human–Nature Relationships in East Asian Animated Films. Societies, 10(2), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10020035
Pradani, A. F., & Sembodo, T. J. P. (2021). The Violation of Conversational Maxims in the Movie Series <em>Divergent<em> Lexicon, 7(2), 224. https://doi.org/10.22146/lexicon.v7i2.66572
Purwati, D., Rustandi, A., & Kurnia, A. D. (2018). The Violation and Flouting of Gricean Maxim Cooperative Principle Realized in Finding Dory Movie.
Rahmi, S. S., Refnaldi, R., & Wahyuni, D. (2018). The violation of Conversational Maxims found in political conversation at Rosi Talkshow. English Language and Literature, 7(1).
Riganas, N. (2022). Puss in Boots: The Last Wish Plot Summary. .
Riyadi Santosa. (2021). Dasar-dasar penelitian kualitatif kebahasaan. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Seers, K. (2012). Qualitative data analysis. Evidence Based Nursing, 15(1), 2–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs.2011.100352
Shah, M. H., Yaqoub, M., & Wu, Z. J. (2020). Post-pandemic Impacts of COVID-19 on Film Industry Worldwide and in China. Global Media Journal: Pakistan Edition, 13(2).
Stuchlikova, L., Kosa, A., Jakus, J., Susoliak, M., Donoval, D., & Hrbacek, J. (2014). Interactive animation as a motivation tool. 10th European Workshop on Microelectronics Education (EWME), 116–119. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EWME.2014.6877408
Thorne, S. (2000). Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 3(3), 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebn.3.3.68
Turkmen, M. (2016). Violence in Animated Feature Films: Implications for Children. Educational Process: International Journal, 5(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.12973/edupij.2016.51.2
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Yulianti, K., & Ambalegin, A. (2021). Maxim violation in pretty little liars TV series. Journal of Applied Studies in Language, 5(2), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.31940/jasl.v5i2.301-308
Zebua, E., Rukmini, D., & Saleh, M. (2017). The violation and flouting of cooperative principles in the ellen degeneres talk show. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 12(1), 103–113.
How to Cite This
Copyright and Permissions
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
LEKSIKA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Data Availability
Share this
Keywords
indexing
Leksika has been indexed in 1) SINTA (Science and Technology), 2) GARUDA (Garba Rujukan Digital), 3) Dimensions, 4) Crossref, 5) BASE, 6) ROAD (Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources), 7) Scilit (by the open access publisher MDPI AG), 8) GoogleScholar, 8) ICI Copernicus, 9) Semantic Scholar

statcounter
Visitors
View My Stats
