Abstract

This study explores the character of Arthur “Boo” Radley in To Kill a Mockingbird through Sigmund Freud  psychoanalytic lens, focusing on his repression, isolation, and unconscious motivations. Arthur, a reclusive figure misunderstood by society, serves as a vital symbol of innocence and resilience in the face of trauma. The novel's themes of alienation and moral growth are intricately connected to Arthur’s interactions with the Finch children and the broader community. A qualitative research design was conducted, using textual analysis to examine Arthur “Boo” Radley’s psychological development and the dynamics of his id, ego, and superego. Key passages involving Arthur were analyzed to uncover how his experiences of trauma and societal judgment influence his actions and internal conflicts. The study reveals that Arthur's repressive upbringing and community ostracism shaped his unconscious desire for connection, which manifests in his small yet significant acts of kindness toward Scout and Jem. Findings suggest that Arthur “Boo” Radley’s character provides a profound commentary on the impact of trauma, the resilience of human kindness, and the importance of empathy in overcoming societal prejudices. His role as a moral catalyst for the Finch children highlights the novel's broader themes of justice, compassion, and the need to challenge preconceived notions. By analyzing Arthur “Boo” Radley, this study contributes to understanding the psychological underpinnings of literary characters and their relevance to societal issues.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

• Cavanna, S. (2023). Psychoanalytic theory: Exploring the depths of the unconscious. International Journal of Clinical Skills.

  Harper Lee. (1960). To Kill a Mockingbird. Grand Central Publishing.

  Jayaputri, H. E. (2022). The Educational Values as Reflected in Harper Lee Novel’s to Kill A Mocking Bird. Acuity: Journal of English Language Pedagogy, Literature and Culture, 7(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.35974/acuity.v7i1.2483

  Johnson, C. (1995). To kill a Mockingbird: Threatening boundaries. Twayne.

  Jones, C. (1996). Atticus finch and the mad dog: Harper Lee’’s to Kill a Mockingbird. The Southern Quarterly, 34, 53–63. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:190510127

  Kowalska, M. (2023). Shadows and Songbirds: Unraveling the Layers of Harper Lee’s Masterpiece. Media i Społeczeństwo, 19(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.2233

  M. Daikh, H. (2020). Racist Manifestations in Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird.” International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(4), 445–450. https://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v10i04.042

  McAdams, R. H. (2015). Empathy and Masculinity in Harper Lee’s to Kill a Mockingbird. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2646066

  Nirmalawati, W., & Wahyuningsih, T. (2017). Love And Fidelity: A Feminist Study On Rama-shinta Story In The Novel Kitab Omong Kosong By Seno Gumira Ajidarma. Leksika, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.30595/lks.v11i2.2067

  Pacheco, A. (2018). Psychological Theories of a Mockingbird.

  Potyk, D., & White, C. W. (2020). Another Lesson from the Mockingbird: Institutional Racism in Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird. The American Journal of Medicine, 133(11), 1360–1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.07.008

  R.A. Dave. (1999). To Kill a Mockingbird: Harper Lee’s Tragic Vision. In Harold Bloom (Ed.), Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird (pp. 49–59). Chelsea House.

  Ramachandran, V. (2012). Encyclopedia of human behavior (P-Z, Vol. 3). Academic Press.

  Sastrawijaya, M. D. (2021). The Character and Moral Values in “To Kill a Mockingbird” by Harper Lee. INFERENCE: Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.30998/inference.v3i1.6070

  Sharmila, K. (2020). Theme of Racial Oppression in Harper Lee’s ‘To Kill a Mocking Bird.’ American Research Journal of English and Literature, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.21694/2378-9026.20002

  Sohn, H. (2017). Disability, a Mockingbird, and a Mad Dog: A Re-reading of To Kill a Mockingbird. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:188733321

  Suri, Dr. G. (2024). The Experience of “Othering” and Possibility of Social Justice: an Analysis of Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird. Journal of English Language and Literature, 11(03), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.54513/JOELL.2024.11306

  Wells, H. (2014). Reimagining To Kill a Mockingbird: Family, Community, and the Possibility of Equal Justice Under the Law</i> . By Austin Sarat and Martha Merrill Umphrey (editors). Amherst and Boston: University of Massachusetts Press, 2013. 196 pp. $24.95 paper. Law & Society Review, 48(2), 488–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12083

  Zhang, S. (2020). Psychoanalysis: The Influence of Freud’s Theory in Personality Psychology. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200425.051

How to Cite This

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Copyright and Permissions

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

LEKSIKA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Data Availability