Abstract

Vocabulary mastery plays a crucial role in supporting young learners’ English proficiency; however, many primary school students continue to struggle with retaining new words due to limited exposure and monotonous instructional methods. Although recent technological advancements, particularly Augmented Reality (AR) have shown, promise in enhancing learners’ engagement and multisensory processing, empirical evidence on AR-based vocabulary learning for early primary EFL students remains limited. This study investigates whether there is a significant difference in vocabulary mastery between second-grade students before and after being taught using Augmented Reality (AR)-Based Flashcards at SDI Al-Munawwarah Pamekasan and determines the magnitude of the effect of this intervention on their vocabulary mastery. A quantitative approach was employed using a one-group pretest–posttest pre-experimental design involving 32 second-grade students selected through total sampling. Data were collected using a picture-based vocabulary test administered before and after the intervention, which consisted of two AR-supported learning sessions. The data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test and effect size calculation. The findings reveal a significant improvement in students’ vocabulary mastery, as indicated by an increase in the mean score from 16.81 in the pretest to 18.69 in the posttest. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test shows a statistically significant difference between pretest and posttest scores (p < .05), accompanied by a very large effect size (r = 0.764). These results indicate that AR-Based Flashcards provide substantial learning benefits by offering engaging, interactive, and visually enriched input that supports vocabulary comprehension and retention. Pedagogically, AR-based instruction should be reinforced through brief consolidation tasks and differentiated scaffolding, while schools should ensure device availability, technical readiness, and teacher preparation to support effective implementation. Future research is recommended to employ comparative designs with larger samples, include delayed posttests, and examine engagement or motivation to better explain AR’s long-term effects.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

• Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
• Amores-Valencia, A., Burgos, D., & Branch-Bedoya, J. W. (2022). Influence of motivation and academic performance in the use of Augmented Reality in education. A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1011409. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1011409
• Arslan, K. (2024). Teaching English Vocabulary: Innovative Methods. CONTEMPORARY RESEARCH IN LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS (ISSN: 2980-2253), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.62601/crll.v2i1.26
• Belda-Medina, J., & Marrahi-Gomez, V. (2023). The Impact of Augmented Reality (AR) on Vocabulary Acquisition and Student Motivation. Electronics, 12(3), 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12030749
• Cai, S., Wang, X., & Chiang, F.-K. (2014). A case study of Augmented Reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.018
• Chen, R. W., & Chan, K. K. (2019). Using Augmented Reality Flashcards to Learn Vocabulary in Early Childhood Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1812–1831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119854028
• Chen, Y. C. (2019). Effect of Mobile Augmented Reality on Learning Performance. Motivation, and Math Anxiety in a Math. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119854036
• Coe, R., Waring, M., Hedges, L. V., & Ashley, L. D. (2025). Research methods and methodologies in education. SAGE Publications Limited.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research Methods in Education (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
• Daulay, S. H., Nabila, A., & Nasution, U. A. (2024). The effect of ICT use on the classroom management in English teaching. Leksika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajarannya, 18(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.30595/lks.v18i1.19718
• Deani, A., & Widodo, P. (2020). Active Learning in Teaching English for Young Learners. ICCoLLiC 2020: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Communication, Language, Literature, and Culture, ICCoLLiC 2020, 8-9 September 2020, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia, 115.
• DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage publications.
• Graves, M. F., August, D., & Mancilla-Martinez, J. (2012). Teaching vocabulary to English language learners. Teachers College Press.
• Hafidah, R., Yusuf, M., & Subagya, S. (2022). Using Augmented Reality Flashcards To Improve English Vocabulary Mastery For Children Aged 4-5 Years. ThufuLA: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Guru Raudhatul Athfal, 10(2), 271. https://doi.org/10.21043/thufula.v10i2.17159
• Knapp, T. R. (2016). Why Is the One-Group Pretest–Posttest Design Still Used? Clinical Nursing Research, 25(5), 467–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773816666280
• Korosidou, E. (2024). The effects of augmented reality on very young learners’ motivation and learning of the alphabet and vocabulary. Digital, 4(1), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital4010010
• Lei, Y., & Reynolds, B. L. (2022). Learning English vocabulary from word cards: A research synthesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 984211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.984211
• Li, Z., Li, J. Z., Zhang, X., & Reynolds, B. L. (2024). Mastery of listening and reading vocabulary levels in relation to CEFR: Insights into student admissions and English as a medium of instruction. Languages, 9(7), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9070239
• Madkur, A., & Albantani, A. M. (2017). Instilling islamic values in foreign language teaching: An Indonesian context. International Conference on Education in Muslim Society (ICEMS 2017), 97–103. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icems-17/25895133
• Makhyoun, W. M. (2024). Object-Modeling Augmented Reality-Based‎ Cards for Developing Preschoolers’ Vocabulary‎ Knowledge and Retention. مجلة کلية التربية بالمنصورة, 125(2), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.21608/maed.2024.373414
• Mayer, R. E. (2024). The Past, Present, and Future of the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
• Miguel-Alonso, I., Checa, D., Guillen-Sanz, H., & Bustillo, A. (2024). Evaluation of the novelty effect in immersive Virtual Reality learning experiences. Virtual Reality, 28(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-023-00926-5
• Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive statistics and normality tests for statistical data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18
• Nurjanah, A. (2025). The Impact of Augmented Reality (Ar) on Vocabulary Acquisition in Elementary School Students. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 9(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v9i1.97639
• Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 45(3), 255.
• Sabila, F. P., & Salmiah, M. (2025). Improving EFL students’ vocabulary acquisition: A phenomenological study on the use of the “DuoCards” mobile application. Leksika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajarannya, 19(2), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.30595/lks.v19i2.26360
• Sadan, M., Lipka, O., & Katzir, T. (2024). Students’ emotional experiences and learning outcomes during digital vocabulary instruction: Comparing struggling and typical third grade readers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2382452
• Song, Y., Wen, Y., Yang, Y., & Cao, J. (2023). Developing a ‘Virtual Go mode’ on a mobile app to enhance primary students’ vocabulary learning engagement: An exploratory study. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2047693
• Statistics, L. (2020). Wilcoxon signed rank test. Retrieved From.
• Sun, T., & Nam, H. (2023). Variations in Vocabulary Depth Among Second Language Learners with Comparable Vocabulary Breadths: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(6), 2473–2498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-10009-w
• Suryanto, J. (2025). Navigating the challenges of TEFL in resource-limited elementary school: Insights from Yogyakarta. Leksika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajarannya, 19(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.30595/lks.v19i1.25802
• Thyer, B. A. (2012). Pre-experimental research designs. Quasi-Experimental Research Designs, 29–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387384.003.0002
• Topu, F. B., Yilmaz, R. M., & Tulgar, A. T. (2024). The effects of using augmented reality on vocabulary learning and attitude of pre-school children in English education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(10), 11733–11764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12284-5
• Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2017). How vocabulary is learned. Oxford University Press.
• Zhang, M. M., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2025). Analyzing and comparing augmented reality and virtual reality assisted vocabulary learning: A systematic review. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 6, 1522380. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2025.1522380
• Zhou, K., Jin, F., Li, W., Song, Z., Huang, X., & Lin, C.-H. (2024). The design of technology-enhanced vocabulary learning: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12423-y

How to Cite This

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Copyright and Permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

LEKSIKA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Data Availability