Manuscript Writing Guideline

1. General Information

AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed articles that contribute significantly to the advancement of mathematics education. Authors must carefully follow these guidelines to ensure compliance with the journal’s standards and facilitate an efficient review process.

 
  1. Manuscripts must present original research and must not be under review or published elsewhere.
  2. Submissions should use the official AlphaMath MS Word template. Download the template here.
  3. Manuscripts must be submitted via the Open Journal System (OJS):
    http://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/alphamath/about/submissions.
  4. Language: Articles must be written in English using Palatino Linotype font throughout.
  5. Similarity check: A maximum similarity index of 20% is allowed (Turnitin or iThenticate).
  6. All authors’ full names, affiliations, and email addresses must be accurately entered in OJS at the time of submission.
  7. Files that must be uploaded when submitting are the Manuscript, Plagiarism Report, and Author Contribution Form.

2. Manuscript Format

2.1 Title

 
  1. Maximum 14 words, written in Palatino Linotype, 14 pt, bold, and Capitalize Each Word.
  2. Avoid unnecessary abbreviations and jargon.

2.2 Author Information

 
  1. Full names of all authors without academic titles (Palatino Linotype, 10 pt, bold).
  2. Institutional affiliations (Palatino Linotype, 10 pt, regular).
  3. Provide the email address of the corresponding author.
  4. Editorial communication will be conducted with the first-listed author, unless otherwise stated.

2.3 Abstract

 
  1. Written in English, 150–250 words, single-spaced, Palatino Linotype, 10 pt
  2. Must provide a concise and self-contained summary of the article, highlighting:
   
  • Background and context of the study
  • Research objectives and questions
  • Methodology and data sources
  • Key findings (quantitative where possible)
  • Novelty, urgency, and contribution
  • Main conclusion and broader implications
    c. Avoid citations, uncommon abbreviations, or jargon.

2.4 Keywords

 
  1. Provide 3–5 keywords separated by commas (,)
  2. Arrange alphabetically to facilitate indexing

3. Article Structure

3.1 Introduction

 
  1. Written in Palatino Linotype, 12 pt, single-spaced, without subheadings.
  2. The introduction must:
   
  •  Establish the broader research context and explain why the study is significant within mathematics education.
  • Present up-to-date and relevant literature, summarizing at least five previous studies.
  • Identify gaps, limitations, or unresolved issues in existing research.
  • Highlight the novelty and contribution of your study without overstating claims.
  • Conclude with a clear statement of objectives and a brief outline of the research approach.

Citation style: Use APA 7th edition (e.g., Demir-Ayaz, 2022; Palomares-Ruiz et al., 2021).


3.2 Methods

Provide a clear, structured, and reproducible explanation of how the research was conducted. Subheadings are recommended:

 
  1. Research Design — Specify whether the study uses qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods and justify the chosen design.
  2. Participants or Data Sources — Describe the participants, population, or datasets used, including selection criteria and demographics.
  3. Instruments — Detail tools used for data collection, citing prior validation where applicable.
  4. Procedures — Summarize the step-by-step process of conducting the research.
  5. Data Collection Techniques — Explain how, where, and when data were gathered.
  6. Data Analysis Techniques — Describe analytical tools and techniques (e.g., SPSS, NVivo, R).

Notes:

 
  1. Present methods in the same order as the results.
  2. Highlight any novel aspects of your methodology.

3.3 Results and Discussion

Presenting Results

 
  1. State findings clearly, answering the research objectives directly.
  2. Use tables, figures, or graphs as needed. Ensure they are properly labeled and avoid unnecessary duplication between text and visuals.
  3. Present findings chronologically or according to the methods described.

Discussion
Interpret the findings in-depth:

 
  1. Compare with previous studies and relevant theories.
  2. Highlight novelty and contribution to mathematics education.
  3. Explain unexpected results and discuss limitations.
  4. Emphasize practical implications and broader significance.

3.4 Conclusion

 
  1. Provide a concise synthesis of research findings and their significance.
  2. Show how the findings advance mathematics education research.
  3. Briefly state contributions, implications, and, where relevant, recommendations for future studies.
  4. Present the conclusion in paragraph form—do not use bullet points or numbering.

3.5 Acknowledgments

 
  1. Recognize funding sources, institutions, and individuals who contributed significantly but are not listed as authors.
  2. If applicable, include grant numbers as required by the funding agency.
  3. Keep this section concise and respectful.

3.6 Author’s Declaration

  a. Author Contributions — Specify individual roles, e.g.:
    Author 1: Conceptualization, Writing – Original Draft
Author 2: Review & Editing
Author 3: Validation and Supervision
  b. Funding Statement — Disclose funding sources supporting the research.
c. Conflict of Interest — Authors must declare any potential conflicts.
d. Additional Information — Provide supplementary details if necessary.

3.7 References

 
  1. Include at least 30 references, with 80% from peer-reviewed journals published within the last 10 years.
  2. Authors are encouraged to cite at least two articles from AlphaMath.
  3. Follow the APA 7th Edition style consistently for in-text citations and the reference list.
  4. Include DOIs or permanent links wherever available.
  5. Use Mendeley, Zotero, or EndNote to ensure accuracy and consistency.

Examples:

 

Moh Ghoizi Eriyanto, M. V. Roesminingsih, Soedjarwo, & Ivan Kusuma Soeherman. (2021). The effect of learning motivation on learning independence and learning outcomes of students in the Package C Equivalence Program. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(4), 455–467. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v2i4.122

Palomares-Ruiz, A., Cebrián-Martínez, A., García-Toledano, E., & López-Parra, E. (2021). Digital gender gap in university education in Spain: A case study for paired samples. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121096


4. Additional Information

 
  1. All articles must begin on an odd-numbered page.
  2. If a manuscript ends on an odd page, an additional blank page will be inserted and counted toward the total page number, affecting the publication fee.

 

 

Indexed by





Statcounter

AlphaMath 

Template

Tools & Support