Abstract

Critical thinking is one of the skills students must have in mathematics learning so that students can make the right decisions when solving mathematical problems. This study aims to analyze the effects of the POGIL on students’ mathematical critical thinking skills. This research is an quasy experimental study, with a post test only control design research design. The population in this study were all students of grade VIII SMP N 2 Kemangkon in the academic year of 2018/2019. The sampling was done by cluster random sampling techniques and it obtained two sample classes namely class VIII C as an experimental class using learning with the POGIL model and class VIII B as control class using conventional learning models. The instrument used in this study was post-test mathematical critical thinking skill. Based on the result of hypothesis testing using independent sample t-test with a 95% confidence level, it shows that POGIL has an effect on students’ mathematical critical thinking skills.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

• De Gale, S., & Boisselle, L. N. (2015). The effect of POGIL on academic performance and academic confidence.

  Ennis, R. (1991). Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. Teaching philosophy, 14(1), 5-24.

  Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University of Illinois, 2-4.

  Fahmy, A. F. R., Wardono, W., & Masrukan, M. (2018, February). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika dan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Pada Model Pembelajaran Rme Berbantuan Geogebra. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (Vol. 1, pp. 559-567).

  Haryani, D. (2011). Pembelajaran matematika dengan pemecahan masalah untuk menumbuhkembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA, FMIPA, UNY pada (Vol. 14, pp. 121-26).

  Johnson, E. B. (2007). Contextual teaching and learning: Menjadikan kegiatan belajar mengajar mengasyikkan dan bermakna. Bandung: Mizan Learning Center.

  Kamaluddin, M. (2017). Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika dan Strategi untuk Meningkatkannya. In Seminar Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY 2017, ISBN. 978-602-73403-2 (Vol. 9).

  Malik, A., Oktaviani, V., Handayani, W., & Chusni, M. M. (2017). Penerapan Model Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Untuk meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 127-136.

  Marpaung, D. (2018).”Penerapan Metode Diskusi dan Presentasi untuk Meningkatkan Minat dan Hasil Belajar Siswa di Kelas XI IPS-1 SMA Negeri Bagan 1 Sinembah”. School Education Journal, 8, (4)

  Muhammad, M. (2017). Pengaruh Motivasi dalam Pembelajaran. Lantanida Journal, 4(2), 87-97.

  Paul, R & Elder, L. (2007). “Critical Thinking Competency Standars”. Foundation for Critical Thinking Press. www.criticalthinking.org

  Prihatiningsih, dkk. (2016). “Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP Pada Materi Klasifikasi Makhluk Hidup”. Pros. Semnas Pend. IPA Pascasarjana UM, 1

  Rahman, A., Meliyana, M., & Rifqiawati, I. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (Pogil) Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Siswa Pada Subkonsep Urinaria Kelas Xi Di Ma. Bioedukasi (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 9(2), 132-143.

  Sen, S., dkk. (2016). “High School Students Views about Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL)”. The Turkish Online Journal of Educations Technology

  Siregar, N. R. (2017). Persepsi siswa pada pelajaran matematika: studi pendahuluan pada siswa yang menyenangi game. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah Nasional X Ikatan Psikologi Perkembangan Indonesia, 1.

  Yildirim, B., & Ozkahraman, S. (2011). Critical thinking in nursing process and education. International journal of humanities and social science, 1(13), 257-262.

  Zawadzki, R. (2010). Is process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) suitable as a teaching method in thailand’s higher education. Asian journal on education and learning, 1(2), 66-74.

There is no Supplemental content for this article.

How to Cite This

Article Metrics

Copyright and Permissions

Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:

• The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s) without restrictions
• The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
• The author grants the journal the first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
• Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgement of their initial publication in this journal
• Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (For example in the Institutional Repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger citations of published work
• Articles and all related material published are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

 

License

AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

You are free to :

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially

Data Availability