428
Abstract Views
302
PDF Download
Cover and Table of Contents Issue

PENGARUH PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DENGAN STRATEGI PROBING PROMTING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS DAN REGULASI DIRI SISWA

Ayu Ardiana Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia Correspondence [email protected]
,
Eka Setyaningsih Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia Correspondence [email protected]
Pages 63-82
Browse this journal

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find: 1). Student's achievement in mathematics communication ability who followed the learning process using Probing Prompting strategy; 2).  Student's achievement in self-regulation who followed the learning process using Probing Prompting strategy; 3). Whether a student's achievement in mathematics communication ability who followed the learning process using Probing Prompting strategy is better than a student who followed a direct learning process; 4). Whether a student self-regulation who followed the learning process using Probing Prompting strategy is better than a student who followed a direct learning process.The population of this research is a whole of the 8thgrade students from one of the Junior High School in Purwokerto. The data-gathering process is determined by post-test and questionnaire. The result that can be inferred from the post-test are the class average which using Probing Prompting strategy for their learning process are 72,29 and the class average which using direct learning process are 65,62 and the result that can be inferred from the questionnaire are the class average which using Probing Prompting strategy for their learning process are 76,62 and the class average which using direct learning process are 67,85. The result of this research shows that that student's achievement in mathematics communication ability who followed the learning process using the Probing Prompting strategy is better than a student who followed a direct learning process. Student self-regulation who followed the learning process using the Probing Prompting strategy is better than a student who followed a direct learning process.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

  • Arends.2008. Learning to Teach. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

    Arikunto, S. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

    Effendy.2009. Ilmu Komunikasi: Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

    Fachrurozi. (2011). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Komunikasi Sekolah Dasar. Halaman 78. Tersedia di http://jurnal.upi.edu/file/8-Fachrurozi.pdf.

    Hamruni. 2012. Strategi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani.

    Huda, Miftahul.2014. Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran: Isu-isu Metodis dan Paradigmatis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

    Kuswana.2013. Taksonomi Berpikir. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

    Mayasari,dkk.2014. Penerapan Teknik Probing Promting dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII MTSN Lubuk Padang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol.3 No. 1.

    Mulyana.2008. Komunikasi Efektif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

    NCTM. 2000. Principles and Stabdars for School Mathematic Reston VA : The National Teachers of Council of Mathematics Inc.

    Ontario Ministry Of Education. 2010. Communication in the Mathematics Classroom. On: Ontario. Tersedia:

    http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/research/CBS_Communication_Mathematics.pdf.

    Ormord, J.E. 2008. Psikologi Pendidikan. Edisi keenam. Jakarta: Erlangga.

    Permendikbud Nomor 58 Tahun 2014. Tentang Kurikulum SMP : Lampiran III. Jakarta. Dikti.

    Priyatno, Duwi. 2010. Paham Analisa Statistik Data dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: MediaKom.

    91

    Rusman.2014. Model-model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Edisi kedua. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

    Sanjaya, W.2006. Strategi Pembelajaran berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta:Kencana.

    Santrock.2007. Remaja.Edisi kesebelas. Jakarta: Erlangga.

    Shadiq.2009. Kemahiran Matematika. Diklat Instruktur Pengembangan Matematika SMA.

    Shoimin, Aris.2014. 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2103. Yogyakarta: AR-Ruzz Media.

    Sudjana, Nana. 2011. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

    Sugiyono.2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

    Susanto.2015. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

    Suyadi.2013. Strategi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Karakter. Basndung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

    Suyatno.2009. Menjelajah Pembelajaran Inovatif. Sidoarjo: Masmedia Buana Pustaka.

    Trianto .2009. Mendesain Model Pembelajarn Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

    Umar, W. (2012). Membangun Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. [on line]. Tersedia : http://publikasi.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/files/2000/08/jurnal-Infinity.pdf.

    Uyanto, S.2006. Pedoman Analisis Data dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

    Warsono,dkk.2013. Pembelajaran Aktif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

    Widoyoko, Eko Putro. 2014. Penelitian Hasil Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

    Zimmerman, BJ dan Cleary, TJ. 2006. Adolescent’s Development Of Personal Agency
There is no Supplemental content for this article.

How to Cite This

Ardiana, A., & Setyaningsih, E. (2018). PENGARUH PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DENGAN STRATEGI PROBING PROMTING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS DAN REGULASI DIRI SISWA. AlphaMath : Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.30595/alphamath.v4i1.7365

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Verify authenticity via CrossMark

Copyright and Permissions

Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:

  • The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s) without restrictions
  • The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
  • The author grants the journal the first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgement of their initial publication in this journal
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (For example in the Institutional Repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger citations of published work
  • Articles and all related material published are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

 

License

Creative Commons License

AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

You are free to :

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially

Data Availability

All data generated during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].
 

Indexed by





Statcounter

AlphaMath 

Template

Tools & Support