Abstract

Mathematical thinking is absolutely essential for school learning at all levels, including the HOT and LOT. The purpose of this study is to characterize the mathematical critical thinking ability pattern using Ennis and Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. The research conducted in this study is qualitative. Purposive sampling was used in this study, which was conducted at SMPN 29 Bandar Lampung. Five people were involved in this study. To collect data, the researcher used a mathematical critical thinking essay test, a multiple intelligence questionnaire administered by a psychology expert, and in-depth interviews. Techniques for data analysis include data reduction, data visualization, inference, and verification (conclusion drawing and verification). The triangulation technique is used to find the truth of the data. The findings indicated that students were able to articulate the steps involved in developing mathematical critical thinking abilities. Additionally, students are more critical when it comes to problem-solving and approach the problem appropriately. Students provide direct responses rather than generalizations. Mathematics-related critical thinking patterns are frequently inductive.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

• Abdi, A., Laei, S., & Ahmadyan, H. (2013). The Effect of Teaching Strategy Based on Multiple Intelligences on Students’ Academic Achievement in Science Course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(4), 281–284.

  Abrahamson, D., & Trninic, D. (2015). Bringing forth mathematical concepts: Signifying sensorimotor enactment in fields of promoted action. ZDM, 47(2), 295–306.

  Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005

  Baroody, A. J. (2003). The development of adaptive expertise and flexibility: The integration of conceptual and procedural knowledge. The Development of Arithmetic Concepts and Skills: Constructive Adaptive Expertise, 1–33.

  Cramer, K. A., & Post, T. R. (2002). Initial fraction learning by fourth-and fifth-grade students: A comparison of the effects of using commercial curricula with the effects of using the rational number project curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(2), 111–144. https://doi.org/10.2307/749646

  Fatimah, A. T. (2021). Mathematical Reasoning of Vocational High School Students on Mathematical Tasks in the Law of Demand Context. AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.30595/alphamath.v7i2.10585

  Gardner, H. (1991). Intelligence in seven steps. Creating the Future. Perspective on Educational Change, 395–406.

  Gardner, H. (1995). ‘ Multiple Intelligences’ as a Catalyst. The English Journal, 84(8), 16–18.

  Hamidah, K., & Suherman, S. (2016). Proses Berpikir Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika di tinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Keirsey. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 231–248.

  Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington, DC: Mathematics Learning Study Committee. Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council, National Academy Press.

  Lestari, W., Selvia, F., & Layliyyah, R. (2019). Pendekatan Open-ended Terhadap Kemampuan Metakognitif Siswa. At-Ta’lim: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(2), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.36835/attalim.v5i2.263

  Maitrianti, C. (2021). Hubungan antara kecerdasan intrapersonal dengan kecerdasan emosional. Jurnal MUDARRISUNA: Media Kajian Pendidikan Agama Islam, 11(2), 291–305.

  Matondang, K., Hasratuddin, H., & Armanto, D. (2020). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran RME Berbantuan ICT untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 22I8-241.

  Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage publications.

  Muhali, M. (2019). Pembelajaran inovatif abad ke-21. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 3(2), 25–50.

  Mujib, M. (2019). Penjenjangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Berdasarkan Teori Bloom Ditinjau Dari Kecerdasan Multiple Intelligences. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 2(1), 87–103.

  Mujib, M., & Mardiyah, M. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Berdasarkan Kecerdasan Multiple Intelligences. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 187–196.

  Mutjah, M. (2011). Kolaborasi Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika Problem Solving, Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik dan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika Open-Ended. INSANIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 16(2), 187–204.

  Nahdi, D. S., & Jatisunda, M. G. (2020). Analisis literasi digital calon guru SD dalam pembelajaran berbasis virtual classroom di masa pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 6(2).

  Prihatami, E. (2020). POGIL Berpengaruh terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis? AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(2), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.30595/alphamath.v5i2.7342

  Rejeki, S., & Isharyanti, L. (2020). Hubungan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dengan Kecerdasan Intrapersonal Siswa di SDN 2 Jontlak Kabupaten Lombok Tengah. CIVICUS: Pendidikan-Penelitian-Pengabdian Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 8(1), 70–75.

  Setiawan, R., & Mardapi, D. (2020). Multiple Intelligences-Based Creative Curriculum: The Best Practice. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 611–627.

  Suherman, S., Prananda, M. R., Proboningrum, D. I., Pratama, E. R., Laksono, P., & Amiruddin, A. (2020). Improving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) with Project Based Learning (PjBL) Model Assisted by Geogebra. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012027

  Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of Mathematical Creative Thinking: A Systematic Review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019

  Sulistiani, E., & Masrukan, M. (2017). Pentingnya berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran matematika untuk menghadapi tantangan MEA. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 605–612.

  Verschaffel, L., Torbeyns, J., De Smedt, B., Luwel, K., & Van Dooren, W. (2007). Strategy flexibility in children with low achievement in mathematics. Educational and Child Psychology, 24(2), 16–27.

  Wulandari, N. P., Tiro, M. A., & Sanusi, W. (2018). Pengaruh kecerdasan interpersonal, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan efikasi diri terhadap hasil belajar matematika dan sikap terhadap matematika siswa kelas VIII di sekolah menengah pertama di kota Makassar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Venue Artikulasi-Riset, Inovasi, Resonansi-Teori, Dan Aplikasi Statistika (VARIANSI), 1(1), 56–73.

  Yasin, M., Huda, S., Septiana, R., & Palupi, E. K. (2020). Mathematical critical thinking ability: The effect of scramble learning model assisted by prezi in islamic school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1), 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012007

  Yunita, N. W., Hobri, H., Oktavianingtyas, E., Sunardi, S., & Yudianto, E. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Aritmetika Sosial dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Lesson Study For Learning Community Ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Logis Matematis. Kadikma, 9(3), 1–10.

How to Cite This

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Copyright and Permissions

Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:

• The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s) without restrictions
• The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
• The author grants the journal the first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
• Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgement of their initial publication in this journal
• Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (For example in the Institutional Repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger citations of published work
• Articles and all related material published are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

License

AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

You are free to :

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially

Data Availability