Learning Analysis with ARIAS Model on Students' Critical Thinking Skills Reviewed from Learning Styles
Abstract
A person who can think critically in mathematics means having a high level of ability and is a fundamental ability that students must have to learn mathematics. The research aims to determine the influence of understanding the ARIAS model on students' critical thinking skills in terms of learning style. This type of research is quasi-experimental with a post-test nonequivalent control group design. The research population is a student majoring in mathematics education at Bina Bangsa University, then selected two classes as research subjects. The acquisition of data from mathematical critical thinking skills tests and learning style questionnaires was then processed with the ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) test. The results showed a significant difference in mathematical necessary thinking skills between students and ARIAS learning and ordinary learning and judging from students' learning styles. There was a substantial difference in mathematical critical thinking skills. Furthermore, it is known that there is an interaction between the type of learning and its learning style towards students' mathematical necessary thinking skills.There is no Figure or data content available for this article
References
Arti, N., Utami, C., & Prihatiningtyas, N. C. (2020). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar Matematika Dengan Kemampuan Numerik Siswa Pada Materi Aljabar. JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 5(2), 92–99.
Bayuningsih, A. S., Usodo, B., & Subanti, S. (2018). Critical thinking level in geometry based on self-regulated learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1), 12143.
Bozkurt, A. (2018). Examining the accuracy and justification of geometric constructions made by pre-service teachers with dynamic geometry software and the awareness they gained throughout the process. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.383197
D’Alessio, F. A., Avolio, B. E., & Charles, V. (2019). Studying the impact of critical thinking on the academic performance of executive MBA students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 275–283.
Dewi, D. P., Mediyani, D., Hidayat, W., Rohaeti, E. E., & Wijaya, T. T. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Smp Pada Materi Lingkaran Dan Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 2(6), 371–378.
Firman, F., & Rahayu, S. (2020). Pembelajaran online di tengah pandemi covid-19. Indonesian Journal of Educational Science (IJES), 2(2), 81–89.
Jamani, N. A., Abdaziz, K. H., Karim, H. S. C. A., Nizar, F. A., Dzulkarnain, H. N., & Azimi, M. I. (2020). Learning Style Preferences among Pre-clinical Medical Students in a Public University in Pahang. IMJM, 17(2), 11–16.
Jamulia, J. (2018). Identifying students learning style preferences at IAIN Ternate. International Journal of Education, 10(2), 121–129.
Jelatu, S., Sariyasa, & Made Ardana, I. (2018). Effect of GeoGebra-aided REACT strategy on understanding of geometry concepts. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11421a
Khalil, M., Khalil, U., & ul Haq, Z. (2019). Geogebra as a Scaffolding Tool for Exploring Analytic Geometry Structure and Developing Mathematical Thinking of Diverse Achievers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 427–434. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5746
Kusuma, J. W., & Hamidah, H. (2019). Kolaborasi Model Assurance-Relevance-Interest-Assessment-Satisfaction dengan Think-Talk-Write untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Berprestasi dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. GAUSS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.30656/gauss.v2i2.1777
Lengkana, D., Surbakti, A., & Amala, D. (2020). The Effect of Mind Mapping and Learning Style on Concepts Mastery and Students’ Representation Skills. International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2019), 422(Icope 2019), 110–117.
Maharani, A., Sulaiman, H., Saifurrohman, Aminah, N., & Rosita, C. D. (2019). Analyzing the student’s cognitive abilities through the thinking levels of geometry van hiele reviewed from gender perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012066
Mareta, W., & Sembiring, B. (2020). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Kelas X Ips Di SMA Negeri 9 Kabupaten Batanghari. SJEE: Scientific Journals of Economic Education, 4(1), 79–86.
Mokodompit, D. F., Pulukadang, R. J., & Manurung, O. (2020). Profil Kreativitas Siswa Kelas VIII SMP N 1 Kalawat Dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Geometri Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Matematika. JSME (JURNAL SAINS, MATEMATIKA, DAN EDUKASI) MATEMATIKA FMIPA UNIMA, 8(1), 23–28.
Ningrat, S. P., Tegeh, I. M., & Sumantri, M. (2018). Kontribusi gaya belajar dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 2(3), 257–265.
Noviarti, Utami, C., & Prihatiningtyas, N. C. (2020). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar Matematika Dengan Kemampuan Numerik Siswa Pada Materi Aljabar. JurnalPendidikanMatematika Indonesia, 5(2), 92–99. https://journal.stkipsingkawang.ac.id/index.php/JPMI/article/view/937
Novtiar, C., & Aripin, U. (2017). Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis dan kepercayaan diri siswa SMP melalui pendekatan open ended. Prisma, 6(2), 119–131.
Ozdemir, A., Alaybeyoglu, A., Mulayim, N., & Uysal, M. (2018). An Intelligent System for Determining Learning Style. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 208–214.
Pramesti, N. M. I., & Ratnadi, N. M. D. (2020). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Emosional, Gaya Belajar Visual, Gaya Belajar Auditorial Dan Kinestetik Pada Tingkat Pemahaman Akuntansi. E-JA e-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(1), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015
Prihatami, E. (2020). POGIL Berpengaruh terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis? AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(2), 15–26.
Primasatya, N., & Jatmiko, J. (2018). Implementation of Geometry Multimedia Based on Van Hiele’s Thinking Theory for Enhancing Critical Thinking Ability for Grade V Students. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(2), 56–59.
Primasatya, N., & Jatmiko, J. (2019). Implementation of Geometry Multimedia Based on Van Hiele’s Thinking Theory for Enhancing Critical Thinking Ability for Grade V Students. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 1(2), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v1i2.40
Şener, S., & Çokçalışkan, A. (2018). An Investigation between Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i2.2643
Siregar, Y. E. Y., Rachmadtullah, R., Pohan, N., Rasmitadila, & Zulela, M. S. (2019). The impacts of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) on critical thinking in elementary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012156
Swastika, G. T., & Narendra, R. (2019). ARIAS learning model based on a contextual approach to increase the mathematical connection capacity. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 7(2), 104. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v7i2.2984
Syafii, M. (2021). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Pada Materi Kalkulus dan Aljabar di Kelas XI IPA SMA. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i1.275
Wassie, Y. A., & Zergaw, G. A. (2019). Some of the potential affordances, challenges and limitations of using GeoGebra in mathematics education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(8), em1734.
Wawan, W. (2018). Analisis pemahaman konseptual dan prosedural siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal Matematika berdasarkan gaya belajar. UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MAKASSAR.
Willia, A., Annurwanda, P., & Friantini, R. N. (2020). Proses Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(2), 116–128.
Yorganci, S. (2018). A study on the views of graduate students on the use of Geogebra in mathematics teaching. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(8).
How to Cite This
Copyright and Permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s) without restrictions
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- The author grants the journal the first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgement of their initial publication in this journal
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (For example in the Institutional Repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger citations of published work
- Articles and all related material published are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).
License
AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).
You are free to :
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially











