Mathematical Literacy Analysis of Class XI Students of the PISA Model in View of Adversity Quotient (AQ)

Elisabet Putri Wardani, Herry Agus Susanto, Erika Laras Astutiningtyas

Abstract


This study aims to describe the mathematical literacy of grade XI students of SMA Negeri 2 Karanganyar in solving the PISA problem model in terms of the Adversity Quotient. For some students, mathematical concepts can be difficult to grasp, causing frustration and disinterest with the subject. For others, external factors such as lack of resources, inadequate teaching methods, and inadequate support can contribute to poor math performance. This research is included in qualitative research. The data used were obtained from test results and interviews. The subjects of the study were carried out by grade XI students of SMA Negeri 2 Karanganyar. Data analysis procedures in this study are data collection, power reduction, data presentation, and conclusion pulling. Checking the validity of power in this study using triangulation techniques/methods. The results showed that (1) Students with climber type AQ were able to explain answers fluently and clearly, able to mention after facts, solve problems with simple strategies in solving problems. (2) Students with campers-type AQ are capable and some are unable to explain answers fluently and clearly, solving problems with simple strategies in solving problems. The types "climber" and "camper" are often used to describe patterns of behavior that can be observed in the context of AQ, there may not be a "quitter" type listed because the main focus of AQ is on the positive and adaptive aspects of facing challenges and difficulties.

Keywords


Adversity Quotient; Mathematical Literacy; Programme for International Student Assessment

References


Annisa Indrawati, F. (2019). Pengaruh Self Efficacy Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Matematika dan Pembentukan Kemampuan 4C. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika 2. PRISMA, 2, 247–267. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/

Chanifah, N. (2015). Profil Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Geometri Siswa SMP Berdasarkan Adversity Quotient (AQ). APOTEMA : Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 1, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.31597/ja.v1i2.153

Dhanita, L., & Hidayat, A. (2015). Gambaran Adversity Quotient Pada Wirausahawan Melayu Di Bidang Kuliner. An–Nafs, 09(03).

Hertiandito, Tito. L. (2016). Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa SMP Pada Pembelajaran Knisley dengan Tinjauan Gaya Belajar. Prisma : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 89–96. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/21433

Junaedi, I., & Asikin, M. (2012). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika Humanistik Untuk Meningkatkan Kemahiran Matematis. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/647

Khanifah, S., & Purwosetiyono, F. X. D. (2019). Literasi Matematika Tahap Merumuskan Masalah Secara Matematis Siswa Kemampuan Tinggi dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Kelas VIII. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 5(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v5i1.4544

Khoirudin, A., Setyawati, R. D., & Nursyahida, F. (2017). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Berkemampuan Matematis Rendah dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Berbentuk PISA. Aksioma, 8(2), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v8i2.1839

Mena, A. B. (2016). Literasi Matematis Siswa SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Kontekstual Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ). Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v7i2.6756

Nur’aini, F., Ulumuddin, I., Lisna, S. S., & Sisca Fujianita. (2021). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Dasar Siswa Indonesia Berdasarkan Analisis Data PISA 2018. In Risalah Kebijakan. http://jurnalpuslitjakdikbud.kemdikbud.go.id

Nurhikmah. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Tipe Climbers Pada Kelas X MIA SMA Negeri 1 Takalar Berdasarkan Gender. https://digilibadmin.unismuh.ac.id/upload/8820-Full_Text.pdf

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Results in Focus What 15-Year-Olds Know and What They Can Do with What They Know. OECD Publishing.

Phoolka, E. S. (2012). Adversity Quotient: A New Paradigm In Management To Explore. 7. www.theinternationaljournal.org

Stoltz, P. G. (2007). The Most Important Factor In Achieving Success, Adversity Quotient , Turning Obstacles Into Opportunities (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Adversity_Quotient.html?id=xH5Jn9JYPF8C&redir_esc=y

Sugiyono, S. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (19th ed.). CV. ALFABETA.

Wahyuningsih, T. (2019). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari Adversity Qoutientpada Model Guided Discovery Learning Pendekatan Metakognitif Berbantuan Schoology [Universitas Negeri Semarang]. http://lib.unnes.ac.id/40336/

Wicaksono, D. B. (2020). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dalam Pembelajaran Arias dengan Strategi Scaffolding Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient Berdasar Gender [Universitas Negeri Semarang]. http://lib.unnes.ac.id/35136/

Widyastuti, R. (2015). Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika berdasarkan Teori Polya ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient Tipe Climber. In Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (Vol. 6, Issue 2).

Yustianingsih, R., Syarifuddin, H., & Yerizon, Y. (2017). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Problem Based Learning (PBL) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Peserta Didik Kelas VIII. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 1(2), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v1i2.563


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.30595/alphamath.v9i2.17529

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 2549-9084