Abstract

Mathematics anxiety is a persistent psychological barrier that negatively affects students’ learning processes and academic performance in mathematics. While previous studies have examined psychological and cognitive predictors of mathematics anxiety, limited research has explored their interaction using an integrative moderated mediation framework. Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 145 Grade VIII students at an Indonesian public junior high school. The relationships among variables were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that self-efficacy significantly reduces mathematics anxiety and positively predicts mathematical reasoning. Mathematical reasoning also negatively predicts mathematics anxiety and partially mediates the relationship between self-efficacy and anxiety. In addition, self-efficacy moderates the relationship between reasoning and anxiety (β = 0.149), indicating that reasoning skills are more effective at reducing anxiety when students have greater confidence in their mathematical abilities. Mediation analysis further reveals that mathematical reasoning partially mediates the relationship between self-efficacy and mathematics anxiety. These findings highlight the critical interplay between psychological and cognitive factors in mitigating mathematics anxiety, suggesting that reducing anxiety requires a dual-track approach that strengthens students’ mathematical reasoning while simultaneously fostering self-efficacy through confidence-supportive instructional practices such as problem-based and case-based learning.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

• Abayeva, N., Mustafina, L., Zhurov, V., Yerakhtina, I., & Mustafina, B. (2024). Leveraging mathematics to enhance critical thinking in technical universities. Asian Journal of University Education, 20(3), 566–581. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v20i3.27861
• Aguilar, J. (2021). High school students’ reasons for disliking mathematics: the intersection between teacher’s role and student’s emotions, belief and self-efficacy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11294
• Alemany-Arrebola, I., Del Mar Ortiz-Gómez, M., Lizarte-Simón, E. J., & Mingorance-Estrada, Á. (2025). The attitudes towards mathematics: analysis in a multicultural context. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 254 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04548-x
• Andres, H. (2020). The role of active teaching, academic self-efficacy, and learning behaviors in student performance. Journal of International Education in Business, 13(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-02-2020-0017
• Ashcraft, M., & Moore, A. (2009). Mathematics anxiety and the affective drop in performance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282908330580
• Atoyebi, O. M., & Atoyebi, S. (2022). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between mathematics anxiety and the mathematical thinking of africa students. Archives of Current Research International, 22(7), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2022/v22i7536
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, 84(2), 191–215. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
• Bergqvist, E. (2024). Relations between mathematics self-efficacy and anxiety beliefs: When multicollinearity matters. The Journal of Experimental Education, 93 (3), 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2024.2338545
• Caviola, S., Toffalini, E., Giofrè, D., Ruiz, J. M., Szűcs, D., & Mammarella, I. (2021). Math performance and academic anxiety forms, from sociodemographic to cognitive aspects: A meta-analysis on 906,311 participants. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 363–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09618-5
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Georg Lang, A. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
• Habibi, M., Wahyuni, N., Rusliah, N., Ilham, M., & Fitri, I. (2021). Effect of mathematics anxiety and intelligence on students’ logical thinking ability. Edumatika : Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v4i2.1102
• Hair, J., Anderson, R., Babin, B., & Black, W. (2013). Multivariate data analysis. (7th ed.). United States of America: Pearson International. Retrieved from https://elibrary.pearson.de/book/99.150005/9781292035116
• Hair, Joe F, Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109(March), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
• Hair, Joe F, Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Eds.), New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Jameson, M., Dierenfeld, C., & Ybarra, J. (2022). The mediating effects of specific types of self-efficacy on the relationship between math anxiety and performance. Education Sciences, 12(11), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110789
• Khasawneh, E., Gosling, C., & Williams, B. (2021). What impact does maths anxiety have on university students? BMC Psychology, 9, 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00537-2
• Kwong-Kay, K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1–32. http://phdtrident.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/108111218/PLS_important_effect_size.pdf
• Lai, Y., Zhu, X., Chen, Y., & Li, Y. (2015). Effects of mathematics anxiety and mathematical metacognition on word problem solving in children with and without mathematical learning difficulties. PLoS ONE, 10(6). e0130570. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130570
• Lovianova, I., Kaluhin, Y., Kovalenko, D., Rovenska, O., & Krasnoshchok, A. (2022). Development of logical thinking of high school students through a problem-based approach to teaching mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2288 012021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2288/1/012021
• Luttenberger, S., Wimmer, S., & Paechter, M. (2018). Spotlight on math anxiety. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2018(11), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s141421
• Mata-Pereira, J., & Ponte, J. (2017). Enhancing students’ mathematical reasoning in the classroom: teacher actions facilitating generalization and justification. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96 (July), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9773-4
• Medová, J., Bulková, K., & Čeretková, S. (2020). Relations between generalization, reasoning and combinatorial thinking in solving mathematical open-ended problems within mathematical contest. Mathematics, 2(18), 2257–2276. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122257
• Meng, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2023). The influence of academic self-efficacy on university students’ academic performance: The Mediating Effect of Academic Engagement. Sustainability, 15(7), 5767–5780. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075767
• Miao, H., Guo, R., & Li, M. (2025). The influence of research self-efficacy and learning engagement on Ed.D students’ academic achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 16 (June). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1562354
• Mofidi, S., Amiripour, P., & Bijan-Zadeh, M. H. (2012). Instruction of mathematical concepts through analogical reasoning skills. Journal of Science and Technology, 5(6), 2916–2922. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2012/v5i6.12
• Mozahem, N., Boulad, F., & Ghanem, C. (2020). Secondary school students and self-efficacy in mathematics: Gender and age differences. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 9(sup1), S142–S152. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2020.1763877
• Novrianto, R., Marettih, A. K. E., & Wahyudi, H. (2019). Construct validity of the indonesian version of the general self-efficacy scale instrument. Jurnal Psikologi, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.24014/jp.v15i1.6943
• Nurkarim, A. W., Qonita, W., & Isroil, A. (2024). Students’ mathematics anxiety scale: a measure of physiological, psychological, behavioral, and cognitive symptoms of mathematics. Sains Data Jurnal Studi Matematika dan Teknologi, 1(2), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.52620/sainsdata.v1i2.18
• Özcan, Z., & Gümüş, A. E. (2019). A modeling study to explain mathematical problem-solving performance through metacognition, self-efficacy, motivation, and anxiety. Australian Journal of Education, 63(1), 116–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944119840073
• Pajares, F., & Kranzler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20 (4), 426–443. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1995.1029
• Palestro, J., & Jameson, M. (2020). Math self-efficacy, not emotional self-efficacy, mediates the math anxiety-performance relationship in undergraduate students. Cognition, Brain, Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, XXIV(4), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.24193/cbb.2020.24.20
• Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(6), 551–554. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0033456
• Rodríguez, S., Regueiro, B., Piñeiro, I., Estévez, I., & Valle, A. (2020). Gender differences in mathematics motivation: Differential effects on performance in primary education. Frontiers in Psychology, 10 (January). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03050
• Rozgonjuk, D., Kraav, T., Mikkor, K., Orav-Puurand, K., & Täht, K. (2020). Mathematics anxiety among stem and social sciences students: The roles of self-efficacy, and deep and surface approach to learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 46 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00246-z
• Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J. F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
• Shimizu, Y. (2022). Relation Between mathematical proof problem solving, math anxiety, self-efficacy, learning engagement, and backward reasoning. Journal of Education and Learning, 11(6), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v11n6p62
• Supriadi, N., Z J., & Suherman, S. (2024). The role of learning anxiety and mathematical reasoning as predictor of promoting learning motivation: The mediating role of mathematical problem solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52(June), 101497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101497
• Utami, R. W., Alawiyah, A., & Waritsman, A. (2025). Mathematical reasoning: An analysis of madrasah ibtidaiyah teacher education (PGMI) novice teachers’ abilities. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v12i1.82701
• Vebrian, R., Putra, Y. Y., Saraswati, S., & Wijaya, T. T. (2021). Kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal literasi matematika kontekstual. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2602–2614. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4369
• Wen, R., & Dubé, A. (2022). A systematic review of secondary students’ attitudes towards mathematics and its relations with mathematics achievement. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 8 (2), 295–325. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.7937
• Whyte, J., & Anthony, G. (2012). Maths anxiety: The fear factor in the mathematics classroom. Teachers’ Work, 9(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.24135/teacherswork.v9i1.559
• Xu, X., & Dieckmann, J. (2025). Differentiating mathematical mindset, growth mindset, and self-efficacy through intervention research: a neuroplasticity approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 16 (June). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1598817
• Zeidner, M. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts. Concepts, findings, and future directions. Emotion in Education, 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372545-5/50011-3
• Zhu, Y., Liu, X., Xiao, Y., & Sindakis, S. (2024). Mathematics anxiety and problem-solving proficiency among high school students: Unraveling the complex interplay in the knowledge economy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15 (April), 20516–20546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01688-w
• Zimmerman, B. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
• Živković, M., Pellizzoni, S., Doz, E., Cuder, A., Mammarella, I., & Passolunghi, M. (2023). Math self-efficacy or anxiety? The role of emotional and motivational contribution in math performance. Social Psychology of Education, 26(January), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09760-8
• Živković, M., Pellizzoni, S., Mammarella, I. C., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2023). The relationship betweens math anxiety and arithmetic reasoning as a mediating role. Current Psychology, 42(17), 14506–14516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02765-0
• Zou, Y. (2025). Mathematical self-efficacy mediating the relationship between motivation, anxiety, and achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 18(3), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.18328a

How to Cite This

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Copyright and Permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:

• The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s) without restrictions
• The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
• The author grants the journal the first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
• Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgement of their initial publication in this journal
• Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (For example in the Institutional Repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger citations of published work
• Articles and all related material published are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

License

AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

You are free to :

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially

Data Availability