Abstract

The development of 21st-century skills, particularly collaboration and critical thinking, has become a central objective in contemporary mathematics education. The Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach is considered a promising intellectual strategy for supporting these competencies through contextual problem-solving activities and structured social interactions. However, emperiecal evidence on the simultaneous contribution on both critical thinking and collaborative skills remains limited. This study aims to assess the effect of the RME approach on students’ critical thinking and collaborative skill in mathematics learning. A quantitative approach using a quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design involving sixty students, divided into an experimental group receiving RME instruction (n = 30) and a control group receiving conventional instruction (n = 30). The research instruments included a critical thinking skills test and an observation-based collaboration skills assessment. Data were analyzed using Multivariate analysis of Covariance to assess the combined effects of RME while controlling for initial abilities .The results revealed that the experimental group ashowed significantly higher posttest scores in critical thinking skills (M = 82.15) compored to the control group (M = 70.46), with N-Gain scores of 0.61 and 0.35, respectively. Similarly, students’ collaborative skills in the experimental group (M = 84.27) were higher than those in the control group (M = 71.15). Multivariate analysis confirmed a statistically significant effect of RME on both critical thinking and collaboration. These findings suggest that RME effectively enhances students' cognitive and social competencies and can serve as an alternative strategy for mathematics instruction.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

• Adhikari, N. P., Budhathoki, J. K., & Adhikari, S. (2025). Use of Critical Thinking in Decision-Making Process. Perspectives on Higher Education, 15(01), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.3126/phe.v15i01.81008
• Alkhatib, O. J. (2019). A framework for Implementing Higher-Order Thinking Skills (Problem-Solving, Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, and Decision-Making) in Engineering & Humanities. In 2019 Advances in science and engineering technology international conferences (ASET) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASET.2019.8714232
• Anggraini, R. S., & Fauzan, A. (2020). The Effect of Realistic Mathematics Education Approach on Mathematical Problem Solving Ability. Edumatika: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v3i2.595
• Care, E., Kim, H., Vista, A., & Anderson, K. (2018). Education System Alignment for 21st Century Skills: A Focus on Assessment.
• Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. routledge.
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage publications.
• Erdogan, F. (2019). Effect of Cooperative Learning Supported by Reflective Thinking Activities on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(80), 89–112. https://doi.org/izlik.org/JA69NK85DJ
• Field, A. (2024). Discovering Statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage publications limited.
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1990). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. ERIC.
• Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative Learning: Review of Research and Practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.977489802155242
• Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional methods: A six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
• Khairunnisak, C., Johar, R., Maulina, S., Zubainur, C. M., & Maidiyah, E. (2024). Teachers’ Understanding of Realistic Mathematics Education Through a Blended Professional Development Workshop on Designing Learning Trajectory. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 55(4), 805–828.
• Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The Development of Learning Innovation to Enhance Higher Order Thinking Skills for Students in Thailand Junior High Schools. Heliyon, 7(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309
• Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Face-to-Face Cooperative Learning. Do Recent Studies Falsify or Verify Earlier Findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002
• Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2019). Dialogue, Thinking Together and Digital Technology in the Classroom: Some Educational Implications of a Continuing Line of Inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007
• Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2016). Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation. Sage publications.
• Nugraheni, L. P., & Marsigit, M. (2021). Realistic Mathematics Education: An Approach to Improve Problem Solving Ability in Primary School. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(4), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i4.19354
• OECD. (2019). Results (Volume I): What students know and can do. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): Paris, France.
• OECD. (2021). 21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World. OECD Publishing.
• Palinussa, A. L., Molle, J. S., & Gaspersz, M. (2021). Realistic Mathematics Education: Mathematical Reasoning and Communication Skills in Rural Contexts. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20640
• Sa’dijah, C., Murtafiah, W., Anwar, L., Nurhakiki, R., & Cahyowati, E. T. D. (2021). Teaching Higher Order Thinking Skills in Mathematics Classrooms: Gender Differences. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(1), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.1.13087.159-180
• Sachdeva, S., & Eggen, P.-O. (2021). Learners’ Critical Thinking About Learning Mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(3), em0644. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11003
• Sahara, S., Juandi, D., Turmudi, T., Hendriyanto, A., Muhaimin, L. H., & Bulus, M. D. (2024). Geometric Reasoning to Reinventing Quadratic Formula: The Learning Trajectory on Realistic Mathematics Education Principles. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 16(3), 164–196. https://doi.org/eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1442295
• Saleh, M., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Isa, M. (2018). Improving the Reasoning Ability of Elementary School Student Through the Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.5049.41-54
• Setioningsih, D. K., Wardani, I. S., & Prayogo, P. (2025). Exploration of the Role of Real Context in Developing Mathematical Understanding Through the Realistic Mathematics Education Approach. Journal La Edusci, 6(6), 1123–1137. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallaedusci.v6i6.2759
• Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using Realistic Mathematics Education and the DAPIC Problem-Solving Process to Enhance Secondary School Students’ Mathematical Literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001
• Surya, E., & Putri, F. A. (2017). Improving Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability and Self-Confidence of High School Students Through Contextual Learning Model. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.1.3324.85-94
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2017). Using Multivariate Statistics.
• Thamrin, L., Gustian, U., Suhardi, S., Zhongfulin, W., & Suryadi, D. (2024). The Implementation of Contextual Learning Strategies to Stimulate Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Retos: Nuevas Tendencias En Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, (53), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v53.102501
• Tohani, E., & Aulia, I. (2022). Effects of 21st Century Learning on the Development of Critical Thinking, Creativity, Communication, and Collaboration Skills. Journal of Nonformal Education, 8(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.15294/jne.v8i1.33334
• Toheri, Winarso, W., & Haqq, A. A. (2020). Where Exactly for Enhance Critical and Creative Thinking: The Use of Problem Posing or Contextual Learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 877–887. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.877
• Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2019). Didactics of Mathematics in the Netherlands. In European traditions in didactics of mathematics (pp. 57–94). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05514-1_3
• Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2020). Realistic Mathematics Education. In Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 713–717). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_170
• Ventistas, G., Ventista, O. M., & Tsani, P. (2025). The Impact of Realistic Mathematics Education on Secondary School Students’ Problem-Solving Skills: a Comparative Evaluation Study. Research in Mathematics Education, 27(3), 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2024.2306633
• Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2017). A comparative Analysis of International Frameworks for 21st Century Competences: Implications for National Curriculum Policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938
• Xu, E., Wang, W., & Wang, Q. (2023). The Effectveness of Collaborative Problem Solving in Promoting Students’ Critical Thinking: A Meta-Analysis Based on Empirical Literature. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1

How to Cite This

Article Metrics

Download Statistics

Other Statistics

Copyright and Permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:

• The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s) without restrictions
• The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
• The author grants the journal the first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgement of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
• Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgement of their initial publication in this journal
• Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (For example in the Institutional Repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and larger citations of published work
• Articles and all related material published are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

License

AlphaMath: Journal of Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International Public License (CC - BY 4.0).

You are free to :

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially

Data Availability