TEACHERS AND STUDENTS PERCEPTION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CURRICULUM 2013
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30595/aplinesia.v3i1.12071Keywords:
Curriculum 2013 Perception Teacher and studentsAbstract
This study aims know the students and teachers perception the English curriculum 2013 of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Purwokerto. 25 students and 3 teachers was used as the subject of the reseach. the data was collected by two forms of a single questionnaire consisting of the same items for students and teachers. In order to find out answers to the questions of the research, the questionnaire was developed by the researcher in the frame of Stufflebeam’s CIPP evaluation model principles. According to the responses to the scales representing English curriculum components such as context, input, process and product, we conclude that, mostly, teachers and students tend to support all four of these curriculum components. However, we noted significant and substantial differences in the support given to the four components of the curriculum. Some significant differences concerning some items of the context, input, process and product components of the curriculum were observed.References
Candoli, I. C., Cullen, K., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1997). Superintendent performance evaluation: Current practice and directions for improvement. Boston: Kluwer.
Erden, M. (1995). Eğitimde program değerlendirme. Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
Gally, J. (1984, April). The evaluation component. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Guba, E. G., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1968). Evaluation: The process of stimulating, aiding, and abetting insightful action. In R. Ingle & W. Gephart (Eds.), Problems in the training of educational researchers. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
Granger, A., Grierson, J., Quirino, T. R., & Romano (1965). Training in planning, monitoring, and evaluation for agricultural research management: Manual 4–Evaluation. The Hague: International Service for National Agricultural Research.
Hovardaoğlu, S. (2000). Davranış bilimleri için araştırma teknikleri. Ankara: VE-GA Yayınları.
Karasar, N. (1999). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Kelly, A. V. (1999). The curriculum. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Limited.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1969). Evaluation as enlightenment for decision-making. In A. Walcott (Ed.), Improving educational assessment and an inventory of measures of affective Behavior. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Nevo, D. (1976, Winter). The availability and importance of evaluation information within the school. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2, 203-9.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Webster, W. J. (1988). Evaluation as an administrative function. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 569-601). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1995). Evaluation of superintendent performance: Toward a general model. In A. McConney (Eds), Toward a unified model of educational personnel evaluation. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University Evaluation Center.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Millman, J. (1995, December). A proposed model for superintendent Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 9(4), 383-410.
Stufflebeam, D. L., Candoli, C., & Nicholls, C. (1995). A portfolio for evaluation of school superintendents. Kalamazoo: Center for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation, The Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1997-a). Strategies for institutionalizing evaluation: revisited. Occasional Paper Series #18. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University Evaluation Center.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003-b). Institutionalizing evaluation in schools. In T. Kellaghan & D. L.
Stufflebeam (Eds.), The international handbook of educational evaluation (Chapter 34). Boston: Kluwer.
Stufflebeam, D. L., Gullickson, A. R., & Wingate, L. A. (2002). The spirit of Consuelo: An evaluation of Ke Aka Ho‘ona. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University Evaluation Center.
Wiles, J. and Bondi J. (2002). Curriculum development-A guide to practice-. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Worthern, B. R., Sanders J. R. and Fitzpatrick J. L. (1997). Program evaluation – Alternative approaches and practical guidelines-. New York: Longman, Inc.
