Abstract

The present research study focused on the students’ and the teachers’ opinion about the curriculum implemented in SMPN 1 Rembang, Purbalingga. A total of 4 teachers and 50 students attending 8th grader and 9th grader classes at SMPN 1 Rembang, Purbalingga was used as the sample of the study. Analyzing the findings of context factors, it can be seen that students are satisfy with the schools facilities such as the library, the supplementary books, the additional English course organized by the school. Students are motivated in joining the English classroom. Nevertheless, the students do not agree that the curriculum‘s activities enable students to use their English language skills. Taking the product factor, both side the students and the teachers are agreed that the curriculum do not enable the students to implement the English competence in their daily life.

There is no Figure or data content available for this article

References

• Arik,(1998). Psikolojide Billmsei Yontem. Cantay Kitabevi: Istanbul.
• Gardner C.R. (2010). Motivation and second Language Acquisition. Peter Lang Publishing: New York.
• Karasar, N (2003). Billmsei Arastima Yontemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim.
• Karatas, H. & Fer, S. (2009). Evaluation of English Curriculum at Yildiz Technical University Using CIPP Model. Educ. Sci. 34(153):47-60.
• Karatas, H. & Fer, S. (2011). CIPP Evaluation Model Scale: Development, Reliability and Validity. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 15:592-599.
• Kocaman, O. balciogu, L.(2013) Students Perception on the Developing of Speaking Skills: A course Evaluation in the Preparatory Class. Proc. Behav. Sci. 106:2470-2483.
• Lauder, A (2008). The status and function of English in Indonesia: a review of key factors. Makara, Social Humaniora. 12(1), 9-20.
• Ornstein, A., & Hunskin, F. (2009). Curriculum Design. In Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues : Boston Allyn and Bacon.
• Ruhe, V. & Boudreau, D.J. (2012) The 2011 Program Evaluation Standards: A framework for Quality in Medical Education Programme Evaluations. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 19:925-932.
• Stufflebeam, D. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Dordrect: Kluwer Academic Publishers pp. 31-62.
• Stufflebeam, D. (2005)_. The CIPP Model. Encyclopedia of Evaluation. California: Sage Publications pp. 60-65.
• Trochim, W. (2002) What is the Research Methods Knowledge Base? Retrieved from http://www.anatomyfacts.com/research/researchmethodsknowledgebase.pdf.

There is no Supplemental content for this article.

How to Cite This

Article Metrics

Copyright and permissions information is unavailable

Data Availability