THE INFLUENCE OF THE MNEMONIC LEARNING MODEL ON THE LEARNING OUTCOMES OF ARTS, CULTURE, AND CRAFTS (SBDP) IN CLASS IV SDN PANNARA, MAKASSAR CITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30595/dinamika.v16i1.19248Keywords:
Keywords, SBdP, Mnemonic Model, Learning outcomesAbstract
ABSTRACT
This study aims to determine whether the mnemonic learning model influences the learning outcomes of arts and crafts (SBdP) for fourth grade students at SDN Pannara, Makassar City. The research method employed was quantitative experimental research with a one-group pretest-posttest design, and the subjects were fourth-grade elementary school students with collage-related two-dimensional expression work material. This study employs research test instruments, observation sheets, and documentation. In this study, descriptive statistical analysis and inferential statistical analysis were used to analyze the data. Fourth-grade students of SDN Pannara Makassar City whose learning outcomes were enhanced by the application of the mnemonic learning model, as demonstrated by the study's findings. This is demonstrated by testing the hypothesis with the t-test and the test results, namely a significance of 0.000 0,000 < α 0,05 which means that H1 is accepted and H0 is rejected. Where H1 asserts that SBdP learning outcomes for fourth-grade students at SDN Pannara have improved because of the use of the mnemonic learning model. While H0 claimed there was no improvement in SBdP learning outcomes for fourth-grade students at SDN Pannara because of the use of the mnemonic learning model, this study found otherwise. The average student score, which ranges from 30.67 on the pre-test to 90.95 on the post-test, further demonstrates this point. The use of the mnemonic learning model improved the learning outcomes of fourth grade students of SDN Pannara in Makassar City. Therefore, it is recommended that teachers, especially of SBdP subjects, consider using the mnemonic learning model in SBdP learning to make the teaching and learning process more effective, enjoyable, and engaging.
References
REFERENCES
[1] S. Arikunto, Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara, 2012.
[2] Aunurrahman, Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2010.
[3] R. W. Dahar, Teori-teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1996.
[4] L. Mareza, “Cultural Art And Craft Education As A General Intervention Strategy For Special Needs Children,” Scholaria, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 35–38, 2017.
[5] D. Prastyo, A. Anturi, and A. M. Fanny, “Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa PGSD UNIPA Surabaya dengan Model Mnemonik pada Materi Peta, Atlas dan Globe Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Audio, Visual dan Kinestetik,” TRIHAYU J. Pendidik. Ke-SD-an, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 199–207, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.30738/trihayu.v4i1.2117.
[6] A. Stine, J.M., Meningkatkan Daya Ingat Anda dengan Menggunakan Seluruh Otak Anda. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2002.
[7] R. L. dkk Atkinson, Pengantar Psikologi Edisi Kesebelas, Jilid satu. Batam: Interaksasa, 1997.
[8] Y. A. Lestari, “Metode Mnemonik untuk Mengingat Dua Belas Nervus Cranialis pada Mahasiswa Tingkat II Akper Kosgoro Mojokerto,” Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, 2010.
[9] L. Rekhamandia, “Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Mnemonik Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa,” Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, 2014.
[10] L. M. Prasetyo, B., & Jannah, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif (Kelima). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.
[11] M. R. S. Jalal, Hasanudin Kasim, Akhiruddin and H. Sriwahyuni, “The Impact of Socio-Economic Status on Teachers ’ Performance in SMP Negeri 2 Parigi Gowa Regency,” IJOLEH Int. J. Educ. Humanit., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.56314/ijoleh.v2i1.
[12] Y. Darusman and W. Herwina, Pembelajaran Mnemonik. Bandung: CV Buku Langka Indonesia, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://repositori.unsil.ac.id/2221/1/PEMBELAJARAN MNEMONIK.pdf
[13] M. H. Tsai, L. Y. Chang, H. C. Chen, and C. L. Lin, “Effects of key-image mnemonics on Chinese instruction for first-grade students’ achievement and interest toward Chinese learning,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 109, no. October 2020, p. 101856, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101856.
[14] T. Tarmilia, F. Fadjaritha, I. W. Istiqomah, E. Purwandari, and F. D. Hutagalung, “Learning and Memory of Early Childhood Tahfiz Quran: A Systematic Review,” J. Obs. J. Pendidik. Anak Usia Dini, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 5913–5922, 2022, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v6i6.1707.
[15] M. Samsudin, “Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Belajar,” Eduprof Islam. Educ. J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 162–186, 2020, doi: 10.47453/eduprof.v2i2.38.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Dinamika Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
